Sergio Alonso |
|
PhD
|
|
IMPPC Institute of Predictive and Personalized Cancer Medicine
·
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics
|
Skills (28)
-
965 Questions51676 Followers
-
22 Questions114 Followers
-
230 Questions4778 Followers
-
36 Questions92 Followers
-
28 Questions83 Followers
-
884 Questions47909 Followers
-
108 Questions17720 Followers
-
207 Questions4890 Followers
-
531 Questions26101 Followers
-
66 Questions2310 Followers
-
9 Questions46 Followers
-
262 Questions18344 Followers
-
244 Questions11684 Followers
-
164 Questions11490 Followers
-
280 Questions8076 Followers
-
135 Questions9564 Followers
-
120 Questions6424 Followers
-
0 Questions16 Followers
-
58 Questions1335 Followers
-
191 Questions10389 Followers
-
18 Questions2687 Followers
Research experience
-
Aug 2003–
Jul 2009Research: Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute
Sanford-Burnham Medical Research InstituteUSA · La Jolla -
Sep 1996–
Jul 2003Research: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular IISpain · Madrid
Education
-
Sep 1997–
Jul 2002Universidad Complutense
PhDSpain · Madrid
Awards & achievements
-
Apr 2006Award: Fishman Fund Award. (http://www.fishmanfund.org/)
Other
-
LanguagesSpanish
English -
Other InterestsGood weather?: mountaineering&rockclimbing, running, surfing, tennis.
Is it raining?: reading (tons), writing (very poorly), chess (~1500 ELO if I'm inspired).
Questions and Answers (3) View all
-
Answer added in Genetic Analysis11 Restriction digestion site preference?By David Wright · The University of EdinburghSergio Alonso · IMPPC Institute of Predictive and Personalized Cancer MedicineIf you are amplifying DNA from a diploid genome, and the SNP is in heterozygosis, it is very likely that you end up with an important proportion of he... [more]If you are amplifying DNA from a diploid genome, and the SNP is in heterozygosis, it is very likely that you end up with an important proportion of heteroduplex molecules after PCR amplification, especially if the PCR program includes many cycles after reaching plateau. In every cycle after plateau, there is not actual amplification but mostly denaturing-renaturing of the DNA molecules. Many of them will renature as heteroduplex (theoretically around %50 of them), which will not be digested by the restriction enzyme. So, if the variant is in heterozygosis, you will have around 25% of molecules digested (since WT-WT homoduplex and WT-Variant heteroduplex will not be digested). If this is the case, either try to reduce the number of cycles in your PCR program to the bare minimum to obtain an observable product after digestion, or just cope with the fact that the SNP in heterozygosis will not render a 50-50 digestion. Hope this helps.Following
-
Answer added in Epigenetics12 How to estimate DNA methylation using real time PCRBy Rahul Bhagat · Kidwai Memorial Institute of OncologySergio Alonso · IMPPC Institute of Predictive and Personalized Cancer MedicineMethyLight is probably the gold-standard to quantitate methylation using QPCR. This method employs fluorescent probes (TaqMan or similar), but dependi... [more]MethyLight is probably the gold-standard to quantitate methylation using QPCR. This method employs fluorescent probes (TaqMan or similar), but depending on the region that you want to study, SYBR-Green detection might be also a good option. In many promoters, methylation generally occurs in an all-or-nothing fashion, so the methylated-target primers are enough to discriminate and quantitate the methylation levels (basically a regular MSP but using QPCR). As a reference amplification reaction, ALU reaction works very well in our hands. MethyLight http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC102836/ MethyLIght on repetitive elements (conditions for the ALU reference reaction) http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/21/6823 Best, SergioFollowing
-
Answer added in Next Generation Sequencing4 How to verify the germline mutations using NGS?By Kejin Zhang · Northwest UniversitySergio Alonso · IMPPC Institute of Predictive and Personalized Cancer MedicineGermline mutations will be present also in the non-tumoral sample. Thus, the comparison of the non-tumoral sample BAM file with the reference genome (... [more]Germline mutations will be present also in the non-tumoral sample. Thus, the comparison of the non-tumoral sample BAM file with the reference genome (NCBI) will pick them up, together with the SNPs of that particular individual. In order to ascertain what is a "mutation" and what is a regular SNP, I think the most straightforward way would be to check their population frequencies in the hapmap/1000 genomes project. Subsequent functional significance prediction ( (PolypPhen) may be very useful to further classify the mutations.Following
Publications (15) View all
-
Article: Draft Genome Sequence of the Steroid Degrader Rhodococcus ruber Strain Chol-4
Laura Fernández de las Heras, Sergio Alonso, Antonio de la Vega de León, Daniela Xavier, Julián Perera, Juana María Navarro Llorens[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The whole-genome shotgun sequence of Rhodococcus ruber strain Chol-4 is presented here. This organism was shown to be able to grow using many steroids as the sole carbon and energy sources. These sequence data will help us to further explore the metabolic abilities of this versatile degrader.Genome Announcements. 05/2013; 1(3):e00215-13. -
SourceAvailable from: Sergio Alonso
Article: Array-based identification of common DNA methylation alterations in ulcerative colitis.
Kei Koizumi, Sergio Alonso, Yuichiro Miyaki, Shinichiro Okada, Hiroyuki Ogura, Norihiko Shiiya, Fumio Konishi, Toshiki Taya, Manuel Perucho, Koichi Suzuki[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) have higher risk of developing colorectal cancer. Albeit the causes remain to be understood, epigenetic alterations have been suggested to play a role in the long-term cancer risk of these patients. In this work, we developed a novel microarray platform based on methylation-sensitive amplified fragment length polymorphism (MS-AFLP) DNA fingerprinting. The over 10,000 NotI sites of the human genome were used to generate synthetic primers covering these loci that are equally distributed into CpG rich regions (promoters and CpG islands) and outside the CpG islands, providing a panoramic view of the methylation alterations in the genome. The arrays were first tested using the colon cancer cell line CW-2 showing the reproducibility and sensitivity of the approach. We next investigated DNA methylation alterations in the colonic mucosa of 14 UC patients. We identified epigenetic alterations affecting genes putatively involved in UC disease, and in susceptibility to develop colorectal cancer. There was a strong concordance of methylation alterations (both hypermethylation and hypomethylation) shared by the cancer cells of the CW-2 cell line and the non-cancer UC samples. To the best of our knowledge, this work defines the first high-throughput aberrant DNA methylation profiles of the colonic mucosa of UC patients. These epigenetic profiles provide novel and relevant knowledge on the molecular alterations associated to the UC pathology. Some of the detected alterations could be exploited as cancer risk predictors underlying a field defect for cancerization in UC-associated carcinogenesis.International Journal of Oncology 12/2011; 40(4):983-94. · 2.40 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Sergio Alonso
Article: Frequent somatic demethylation of RAPGEF1/C3G intronic sequences in gastrointestinal and gynecological cancer.
Johanna Samuelsson, Sergio Alonso, Tatiana Ruiz-Larroya, Tak Hong Cheung, Yick Fu Wong, Manuel Perucho[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: RAPGEF1 (also known as C3G and GRF2) is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that releases GDP from the inactive Rap1 protein, facilitating its subsequent activation by the binding of GTP. Rap1 plays regulatory roles in proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Amplification and overexpression of RAPGEF1 have been found in small cell lung cancers, suggesting an oncogenic role. In contrast, hypermethylation of a promoter CpG island (CGI-A) of RAPGEF1 has been reported in squamous cervical tumors, suggesting an anti-oncogenic role in these gynecological cancers. In our studies of DNA methylation alterations in gastrointestinal cancer we found somatic demethylation of a relaxed-criterion CpG island (CGI-B) located in the first intron of RAPGEF1 in 40% of colon cancers and 8% of gastric cancers relative to their matching normal tissues that were always methylated. We also found somatic demethylation in 47% of squamous cervical carcinomas as well as 33% of ovarian cancers. This somatic change in methylation, however, did not extend to the strict-criterion CpG island located in the promoter region (CGI-A) that was unmethylated in all normal and tumor tissues analyzed. Thus, promoter hypermethylation of RAPGEF1 seems insignificant in colorectal, cervical and ovarian cancers. In contrast, tumor-specific hypomethylation of the gene appears to be frequent in gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers.International Journal of Oncology 03/2011; 38(6):1575-7. · 2.40 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Sergio Alonso
Article: DNA fingerprinting techniques for the analysis of genetic and epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Genetic somatic alterations are fundamental hallmarks of cancer. In addition to point and other small mutations targeting cancer genes, solid tumors often exhibit aneuploidy as well as multiple chromosomal rearrangements of large fragments of the genome. Whether somatic chromosomal alterations and aneuploidy are a driving force or a mere consequence of tumorigenesis remains controversial. Recently it became apparent that not only genetic but also epigenetic alterations play a major role in carcinogenesis. Epigenetic regulation mechanisms underlie the maintenance of cell identity crucial for development and differentiation. These epigenetic regulatory mechanisms have been found substantially altered during cancer development and progression. In this review, we discuss approaches designed to analyze genetic and epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer, especially DNA fingerprinting approaches to detect changes in DNA copy number and methylation. DNA fingerprinting techniques, despite their modest throughput, played a pivotal role in significant discoveries in the molecular basis of colorectal cancer. The aim of this review is to revisit the fingerprinting technologies employed and the oncogenic processes that they unveiled.Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 11/2010; 693(1-2):61-76. · 2.85 Impact Factor -
Article: Down-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor by selective expansion of a 5'-end regulatory dinucleotide repeat in colon cancer with microsatellite instability.
Svetlana Baranovskaya, Yolanda Martin, Sergio Alonso, Ksenia L Pisarchuk, Mario Falchetti, Yuichi Dai, Sophia Khaldoyanidi, Stan Krajewski, Inna Novikova, Yuri S Sidorenko, Manuel Perucho, Sergei R Malkhosyan[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in several tumor types, and its expression is influenced by the length of a 5'-end microsatellite repeat (CA)n: the longer the repeat, the lower the expression. Dinucleotide repeats accumulate insertion/deletion types of mutations in tumors with microsatellite instability. We designed this study to estimate the occurrence of these mutations in EGFR(CA)n and their relevance in carcinogenesis of microsatellite instability-positive colon and gastric tumors. We analyzed the frequency of EGFR(CA)n mutations in vivo in 55 colorectal and 14 gastric microsatellite instability-positive cancers, and in vitro in single-cell clone cultures of microsatellite instability-positive colon tumor cell line LS174. Single-cell clone cultures with different repeat lengths were analyzed by fluorescent-activated cell sorter for EGFR cell-surface expression. A correlation analysis was done between EGFR(CA)n mutations and mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and p53. Unlike single-cell clone cultures, which exhibited higher rate of deletions compared with insertions, most of EGFR(CA)n mutations in colon and gastric tumors were insertions. Longer EGFR(CA)n correlated with lower EGFR cell-surface expression in single-cell clone cultures. In colon cancers, the elongation of the repeat was associated negatively with mutations in KRAS and BRAF, but not in p53. The EGFR(CA)n elongation observed in tumors cannot be explained by an intrinsic property of this repeat favoring insertions versus deletions. Instead, a selection for repeat elongation occurs in microsatellite instability-positive tumors, leading to EGFR down-regulation. These findings suggest that in microsatellite instability-positive tumors current therapies targeting EGFR overexpression may have either no effect or an opposite to the expected effect.Clinical Cancer Research 08/2009; 15(14):4531-7. · 7.74 Impact Factor