Publications (27) View all
-
Article: The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012.
Samuel Kerrien, Bruno Aranda, Lionel Breuza, Alan Bridge, Fiona Broackes-Carter, Carol Chen, Margaret Duesbury, Marine Dumousseau, Marc Feuermann, Ursula Hinz, [......], Jyoti Khadake, Usha Mahadevan, Patrick Masson, Ivo Pedruzzi, Eric Pfeiffenberger, Pablo Porras, Arathi Raghunath, Bernd Roechert, Sandra Orchard, Henning Hermjakob[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IntAct is an open-source, open data molecular interaction database populated by data either curated from the literature or from direct data depositions. Two levels of curation are now available within the database, with both IMEx-level annotation and less detailed MIMIx-compatible entries currently supported. As from September 2011, IntAct contains approximately 275,000 curated binary interaction evidences from over 5000 publications. The IntAct website has been improved to enhance the search process and in particular the graphical display of the results. New data download formats are also available, which will facilitate the inclusion of IntAct's data in the Semantic Web. IntAct is an active contributor to the IMEx consortium (http://www.imexconsortium.org). IntAct source code and data are freely available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact.Nucleic Acids Research 11/2011; 40(Database issue):D841-6. · 8.03 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Allyson Lurena Lister
Article: Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology
M|[eacute]|lanie Courtot, Nick Juty, Christian Kn|[uuml]|pfer, Dagmar Waltemath, Anna Zhukova, Andreas Dr|[auml]|ger, Michel Dumontier, Andrew Finney, Martin Golebiewski, Janna Hastings, [......], Rainer Machne, Pedro Mendes, Matthew Pocock, Nicolas Rodriguez, Alice Villeger, Darren J Wilkinson, Sarala Wimalaratne, Camille Laibe, Michael Hucka, Nicolas Le Nov|[egrave]|re[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The use of computational modeling to describe and analyze biological systems is at the heart of systems biology. Model structures, simulation descriptions and numerical results can be encoded in structured formats, but there is an increasing need to provide an additional semantic layer. Semantic information adds meaning to components of structured descriptions to help identify and interpret them unambiguously. Ontologies are one of the tools frequently used for this purpose. We describe here three ontologies created specifically to address the needs of the systems biology community. The Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) provides semantic information about the model components. The Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology (KiSAO) supplies information about existing algorithms available for the simulation of systems biology models, their characterization and interrelationships. The Terminology for the Description of Dynamics (TEDDY) categorizes dynamical features of the simulation results and general systems behavior. The provision of semantic information extends a model's longevity and facilitates its reuse. It provides useful insight into the biology of modeled processes, and may be used to make informed decisions on subsequent simulation experiments.Molecular Systems Biology. 10/2011; 7(1). -
Article: PSICQUIC and PSISCORE: accessing and scoring molecular interactions
Bruno Aranda, Hagen Blankenburg, Samuel Kerrien, Fiona S L Brinkman, Arnaud Ceol, Emilie Chautard, Jose M Dana, Javier De Las Rivas, Marine Dumousseau, Eugenia Galeota, [......], Gary D Bader, Gianni Cesareni, Ian M Donaldson, David Eisenberg, Gerard J Kleywegt, John Overington, Sylvie Ricard-Blum, Mike Tyers, Mario Albrecht, Henning HermjakobNature Methods 06/2011; 8(7):528-529. · 19.28 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Andreas Dräger
Article: Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology.
Mélanie Courtot, Nick Juty, Christian Knüpfer, Dagmar Waltemath, Anna Zhukova, Andreas Dräger, Michel Dumontier, Andrew Finney, Martin Golebiewski, Janna Hastings, [......], Rainer Machne, Pedro Mendes, Matthew Pocock, Nicolas Rodriguez, Alice Villeger, Darren J Wilkinson, Sarala Wimalaratne, Camille Laibe, Michael Hucka, Nicolas Le Novère[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The use of computational modeling to describe and analyze biological systems is at the heart of systems biology. Model structures, simulation descriptions and numerical results can be encoded in structured formats, but there is an increasing need to provide an additional semantic layer. Semantic information adds meaning to components of structured descriptions to help identify and interpret them unambiguously. Ontologies are one of the tools frequently used for this purpose. We describe here three ontologies created specifically to address the needs of the systems biology community. The Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) provides semantic information about the model components. The Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology (KiSAO) supplies information about existing algorithms available for the simulation of systems biology models, their characterization and interrelationships. The Terminology for the Description of Dynamics (TEDDY) categorizes dynamical features of the simulation results and general systems behavior. The provision of semantic information extends a model's longevity and facilitates its reuse. It provides useful insight into the biology of modeled processes, and may be used to make informed decisions on subsequent simulation experiments.Molecular Systems Biology 01/2011; 7:543. · 8.63 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Zoltán Konthur
Article: A Community Standard Format for the Representation of Protein Affinity Reagents*
David E. Gloriam, Sandra Orchard, Daniela Bertinetti, Erik Björling, Erik Bongcam-Rudloff, Carl A K Borrebaeck, Julie Bourbeillon, Andrew R. M. Bradbury, Antoine de Daruvar, Stefan Dübel, [......], Volker Sievert, Oda Stoevesandt, Michael J Taussig, Marius Ueffing, Mathias Uhlén, Silvère van der Maarel, Christer Wingren, Peter Woollard, David J. Sherman, Henning Hermjakob[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Protein affinity reagents (PARs), most commonly antibodies, are essential reagents for protein characterization in basic research, biotechnology, and diagnostics as well as the fastest growing class of therapeutics. Large numbers of PARs are available commercially; however, their quality is often uncertain. In addition, currently available PARs cover only a fraction of the human proteome, and their cost is prohibitive for proteome scale applications. This situation has triggered several initiatives involving large scale generation and validation of antibodies, for example the Swedish Human Protein Atlas and the German Antibody Factory. Antibodies targeting specific subproteomes are being pursued by members of Human Proteome Organisation (plasma and liver proteome projects) and the United States National Cancer Institute (cancer-associated antigens). ProteomeBinders, a European consortium, aims to set up a resource of consistently quality-controlled protein-binding reagents for the whole human proteome. An ultimate PAR database resource would allow consumers to visit one on-line warehouse and find all available affinity reagents from different providers together with documentation that facilitates easy comparison of their cost and quality. However, in contrast to, for example, nucleotide databases among which data are synchronized between the major data providers, current PAR producers, quality control centers, and commercial companies all use incompatible formats, hindering data exchange. Here we propose Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI)-PAR as a global community standard format for the representation and exchange of protein affinity reagent data. The PSI-PAR format is maintained by the Human Proteome Organisation PSI and was developed within the context of ProteomeBinders by building on a mature proteomics standard format, PSI-molecular interaction, which is a widely accepted and established community standard for molecular interaction data. Further information and documentation are available on the PSI-PAR web site.Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 01/2010; 9(1):1-10. · 7.40 Impact Factor