Topics (12) View all

Publications (10) View all

  • Source
    Article: Cardiac Hemodynamics in Men Versus Women During Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several biologic and clinical factors contribute to the increased 30-day mortality and re-infarction rate in women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Sex differences in cardiac hemodynamic parameters such as pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) have not been examined and might play an important role. The objectives of the present study were to examine whether female sex is an independent determinant of PCWP during acute STEMI and whether an elevated PCWP contributes to all-cause 30-day mortality and re-infarction in women. The clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic features of 470 consecutive patients with STEMI (n = 135 women) undergoing emergency coronary angiography with right-side heart catheterization were evaluated with respect to sex. Women had an elevated PCWP (20 ± 8 vs 16 ± 7 mm Hg, p <0.001) and reduced mixed venous oxygen saturation (67 ± 11% vs 71 ± 9%, p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, female sex (β = 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04 to 6.04, p <0.001), hypertension (β = 2.07, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.83, p = 0.021), and creatine kinase-estimated infarct size (β = 0.001, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.002, p ≤0.001) were independent predictors of an elevated PCWP. Female sex exerted a minor independent effect on 30-day mortality and re-infarction (odds ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.46, p = 0.008). However, once PCWP was entered into the mediation model, sex was no longer significant, suggesting that the effect of sex on the post-STEMI outcomes is potentially mediated through PCWP (odds ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12, p = 0.011). In conclusion, during acute STEMI, women have greater left ventricular filling pressures compared with men, independent of age, hypertension, and infarct size. The biologic explanation for this difference requires additional investigation, although it does not appear to contribute to the increased 30-day mortality and re-infarction rate observed in women.
    The American journal of cardiology 04/2013; · 3.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Evaluation of Gender Differences in Door-to-Balloon Time in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A delayed Door-to-Balloon (DTB) time in women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been associated with an increased mortality. The objectives of this study were to (a) quantify the components of the delayed DTB time in women and (b) assess the independent effect of gender on DTB time in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. METHODS: Clinical parameters were prospectively collected for 735 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI from 2006 to 2010, with particular attention to the components of DTB time, including the onset of chest pain and the 'code' notification of the STEMI team by the Emergency Department. RESULTS: Women were significantly older with more co-morbidity. Upon hospital arrival they also experienced delays in Door-to-Code (23 vs. 17min, P=.012), Code-to-Balloon (63 vs. 57min, P=.001) and thus DTB time (88 vs. 72min, P=.001). After multivariate adjustment, independent determinants of DTB time included female gender (ratio of geometric means [RGM]=1.13; 95% CI 1.02-1.26; P=.022), hypertension (RGM=1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23, P=.014), maximum ST-elevation (RGM=0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.98, P<.001), office hours (RGM=0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.92, P<.001) and triage category (RGM=1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.40, P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women experience delays in identification of the STEMI diagnosis and also in the PCI process. Thus a multifaceted approach addressing both the diagnosis and management of STEMI in women is required.
    Heart Lung &amp Circulation 04/2013; · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • Article: Cardiac rehabilitation may not provided a quality of life benefit in coronary artery disease patients.
    Rosanna Tavella, John F Beltrame
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Improvements in patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important goals of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In patients undergoing coronary angiography for angina and with documented coronary artery disease (CAD), the present study compared HRQoL over 6 months in CR participants and non-participants. Clinical predictors of CR participants were also assessed. METHODS: A total of 221 consecutive patients undergoing angiography for angina with documented CAD and who were eligible for a CR program were recruited. CR participants were enrolled in a six-week Phase II outpatient CR course (31%, n = 68) within 2 months following angiography and the non-participants were included as a control. At baseline (angiography), one and six months post angiography, clinical and HRQoL data were obtained including the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The response rate for the HRQoL assessment was 68% (n = 150). Cross sectional comparisons were age-adjusted and performed using logistic or linear regression as appropriate. Longitudinal changes in HRQoL were assessed using least squares regression. Finally, a multiple logistic regression was fitted with CR participant as the final outcome. RESULTS: At angiography, the CR non-participants were older, and age-adjusted analyses revealed poorer physical (angina limitation: 54+/-25 versus 64+/-22, p <0.05) and mental HRQoL (significant psycho-social distress: 62%, n = 95 versus 47%, n = 32, p <0.05) compared to the CR participants. In addition, the CR participants were more likely to have undergone angiography for myocardial infarction (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, p = 0.001). By six months, all patients showed an improvement in HRQoL indices, however the rate of improvement did not differ between the controls and CR participants. CONCLUSION: Following angiography, CAD patients reported improvements in both generic and diseasespecific HRQoL, however CR participation did not influence this outcome. This may be explained by biases in CR enrollment, whereby acute patients, who may be less limited in HRQoL compared to stable, chronic patients, are targeted for CR participation. Further investigation is required so CR programs maximize the quality of life benefits to all potential CR patients.
    BMC Health Services Research 11/2012; 12(1):406. · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Article: In patients with Chronic Stable Angina, Secondary Prevention Appears Better in the Very Old Compared to Younger Patients: The Coronary Artery Disease in gENeral practiCE (CADENCE) Substudy.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: With our aging communities and the increased prevalence of coronary heart disease (CAD) with age, the impact of this disease in the very old warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVE: To assess health outcomes and the attainment of guideline-based secondary prevention targets in the very old (>80 years, n=482) as compared to young (<65 years, n=582) and elderly (between 65 and 80 years, n=932) patients, all of whom had chronic stable angina. DESIGN: The coronary artery disease in general practice (CADENCE) study was a cluster-stratified cross-sectional survey. This study reports on health outcomes quantitated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and guideline targets achieved for blood pressure, smoking, lipids, diabetic control and body habitus. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: 2031 stable angina patients were recruited from 207 primary care practices. RESULTS: Despite similar angina frequency scores, the very old were more physically impaired by their angina than both the young and elderly [76±25 (Young) vs. 70±26 (Elderly) vs. 63±28 (Very old), p<0.05 for both comparisons]. However, the very old had better quality of life scores than young stable angina patients [72±24 vs. 65±25, p<0.05] and were similar to the elderly [72±24 vs. 72±23, p>0.05]. Also blood pressure, lipid, diabetic and body habitus targets were more often achieved in the very old and elderly patients compared to young stable angina patients. CONCLUSION: Despite similar symptomatic status and greater physical limitations, the very old reported a better quality of life and more often achieved treatment targets than young stable angina patients. Failure to improve secondary prevention measures in younger age groups may potentially contribute to increased morbidity in older age, and failure to achieve 'Healthy Ageing'.
    Heart Lung &amp Circulation 11/2012; · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Chapter: Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Disease
    John F. Beltrame, Rachel Dreyer, Rosanna Tavella
    03/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-51-0262-5

Following (1) See all

Followers (3) See all