Ronald Stewart

Publications (15) View all

• Article: Earth's Oceans; A Theoretical Analysis How Earth's Glaciers Formed Them

  Ronald Stewart
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Currently known science teaches that the oceans formed on Earth 3.8 billion years ago. At this time the Solar System was about 1 billion years old. To explain the formation of the oceans, it is necessary to briefly discuss the formation of earth's Solar System. The Solar System started as a swirling cloud of dust and gases. Eventually the dust and particles hardened and the dust and particles aggregated into bodies of earth hardened rock. The oxygen based gases were also composed of H2O gassed water vapor. Thinking continues that icy comets also collided with the earth and added to the H2O based oxygenated ice particles and resulted in a chain reaction process. That developed into an ongoing cycle and over eons of time the oceans formed more or less from these processes. The author of this article proposes a new theory. That all of the aforementioned is true. Except, that secondary causes of a comet hitting the earth and adding to the development process of the earth's oceans most likely did not happen. Rather, over eons of time what created the bulk of the earth's oceans was : " An ongoing cycle of the glaciers melting from accumulative Co2 gases from ongoing increasing Greenhouse effects. Eventually developing into the oceans upon the earth over eons of time instead ".
  Int'l Journal of Geology and Paleontology. 07/2012; R. Stewart et al. (2012). "Earth's Oceans; A Theoretical Approach How Interconnected Continents and High Altitude Mountain Glaciers Formed Them". Published through:"The Family Journals of Science". Through:"IJGP" -(Int'l Journal of Geology and Paleontology)-October 2012. Under category:"Geology", subtitled:"Articles". At this following URL- http://www.journals-of-science.com/feature-research-papers.html ..
• Source

  Available from: Ronald Stewart

  Article: Sub - Molecular - Paleontology

  Ronald Stewart
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Ever since M.H. Schweitzer wrote her 2003 paper entitled : "The Future of Molecular Paleontology " , apparently was not understood by some paleontologists to mean that the science of paleontology itself, with molecular Paleontology as a sub-discipline science mean that the science of microscopy was at a point where a dinosaur cell for instance can be examined at the atomic level. However, is this so, or has the term : "Molecular Paleontology" rather been maybe misunderstood by some scientists ? If so, what would be a correct definition of this ? Secondly, where is today's paleontology at as a science, in terms of the study of dinosaurs for example as now an extinct biological specimen ? This research paper addresses these questions and issues, in brief comparison to light, florescent, optical, compound, electron, AFM,-(Atomic Force Microscopes),(any other microscopy) and the newest microscopy technology invented in March , 2011 entitled : "Virtual Optical Imaging At (50) -(nm) " microscopy system, since this is the latest technology in microscopy, it will be compared to a second new microscopy and microscopy imaging system invented by the author of this paper which is entitled : "IMMI". Which is the acronym for-(Infinite Microscopic to Macroscopic Imaging). Which IMMI has the capability of not just being used on (objects) just like the : "Virtual Optical Imaging At (50) -(nm) " microscopy system which can only view and image object to some degree at a maximum size of (50) - nm), but IMMI will view and image objects and biological specimen -(like in paleontology) well below the (50)-nm) level. Or makes IMMI immediately applicable to medicine or biology. For example, viewing /imaging the sub-cellular - molecular components of a cell, it's structure or a virus - etc. Keywords ; Lizard, Reptilian, Dinosaur, Paleontology, Dinosaur Biology, Molecular Paleontology, Sub-cellular
  Int'l journal of Geology and Paleontology. 12/2011; R. Stewart, (2011). Sub-Molecular-Paleontology. Published by-(IJGP)-(Int'l Journal of Geology and Paleontology). At- http://www.journals-of-science.com/sub-molec-paleo.html ..
• Article: The Female T-Rex Had Larger Olfactory Organs; Then The Male T-Rex

  Gregorio Matuz M.S, Ronald Stewart
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: It is theorized in a recent paper that T-REX may have been much more than just a carnivor. That T-REX may had also be a scavenger in Theory. However, this previous paper did not anticipate that the female species of T-REX had a nasal distribution nasal cavity and olfactory organs that were larger than her male counterpart. That the primary reason for this was the evident need in the survival mechanism to continue the species through the progeny of T-REX.
  Int'l Journal of Geology and Paleontology. 12/2010; G. Matuz and R. Stewart,(2010). The female T-REX had larger olfactory ogans than the male T-REX. Published through the Int'l Journal of Geology and Paleontology in December, 2010. At- http://www.journals-of-science.com/f-t-rx-lg-olfact.html ..
• Article: The Theory of Unusual Olfactory Organs In T-Rex ; Carnivor and Scavenger ?

  Gregorio Matuz, M.S, T.J. Giddings M.A, P. Snider Ph.D, Ronald Stewart Th.D, Ph.D
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: T-REX is most often thought of being strictly a carnivor. However, this article is to propose the theory that T-REX was not only a carnivor but also a scavenger as well through the study of its over sized skeletal nasal cavity and the theoretical methodology of over sized olfactory organs provided additional capabilities for the survival of T-REX
  Int'l Journal of Geology and Paleotology. 06/2010; Gregorio Matuz et al,(2010). The theory of T-Rex having large olfactory organs; Carnivor and Scavenger. International Journal of Geology and Paleontology. Published as the following URL- http://www.journals-of-science.com/th-t-rx-scavenger.html ..
• Source

  Available from: Ronald Stewart

  Article: Earth's Oceans; A Theoretical Approach How Interconnected Continents and High Mountain Glaciers Formed Them

  R. Stewart, O.Aguiar, G.Artuso, C.I.O. Aristizabal, J.R. Ackerman, W.Trentadue, R. Robinett
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Context - The current scientific theory is that between 2.8 to 4.0 billion years ago, a comet struck the Earth's rocky surface and brought with it dehydrated water based elements, and from this occurrence is what later developed into Earth's oceans. Aims - Are to direct, present and demonstrate that the current theory and model as to how Earth's oceans developed is flawed, and that a new theory and model is needed, presenting new data and evidence as to how Earth's oceans first developed 2.8 to 4.0 billion years ago, and what later additionally contributed to the total water volume we see in Earth's oceans up to the present period of time. Method / Result - Will first be presented in a manner or mode of procedure, that will follow a orderly, logical, systematic empirical method of investigation. Presenting and demonstrating new data, evidence, cited references, and images, showing that 2.8 to 4.0 billion years ago, over a period of hundreds of millions to several billion years Carbonaceous Chondrite meteors / meteorites rich in dehydrated water based elements sped through the Earth's thin atmosphere, striking the Earth's rocky surface. This resulted in Carbonaceous Chondrite meteor /meteorite explosions, transforming them into gaseous water vapor, and depositing condensation on high mountain ranges, eventually developing into glaciers, and after melting, formed Earth's first oceans. Keywords : Oceans, Oceanography, Geology, Geo-physics, Glaciology, Snowball Earth, Volcanoes
  ISPR International Society of Peer Reviewers. 01/2013; Citation: R. Stewart et al. (2012). "Earth's Oceans; A Theoretical Approach How Interconnected Continents and High Altitude Mountain Glaciers Formed Them". Published through-(ISPR).-(Journal of International Society of Peer Reviewers). Under subject category (O). For-(Oceanography). Second research paper at the bottom at- http://www.stewart-research-consulting.com/ispr-oceanography.html ..