Publications (37) View all
-
Article: Do Stimulants Reduce the Risk for Cigarette Smoking in Youth with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? A Prospective, Long-Term, Open-Label Study of Extended-Release Methylphenidate.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Although attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a well-known risk factor for cigarette smoking, prospective studies aimed at reducing smoking risk in this population are critically needed. STUDY DESIGN: This was a 2-year, prospective, open-label clinical trial of extended-release methylphenidate for smoking prevention in adolescents with ADHD (n = 154). Smoking outcomes were assessed with the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Comparisons were made using data from a historical, naturalistic sample of ADHD (n = 103) and non-ADHD comparators (n = 188) of similar age and sex assessed with the same assessment battery as that used in subjects participating in the clinical trial. RESULTS: The smoking rate at endpoint (mean, 10 months of methylphenidate treatment) was low in the clinical trial subjects and not significantly different from that in the non-ADHD comparators or the ADHD comparators receiving stimulants naturalistically (7.1% vs 8.0% vs 10.9%; P > .20). In contrast, the smoking rate was significantly lower in the clinical trial subjects than in the naturalistic sample of ADHD comparators who were not receiving stimulant treatment (7.1% vs 19.6%; P = .009 [not significant], adjusting for comorbid conduct disorder and alcohol and drug abuse). CONCLUSION: Although considered preliminary until replicated in future randomized clinical trials, the findings from this single-site, open-label study suggest that stimulant treatment may contribute to a decreased risk for smoking in adolescents with ADHD. If confirmed, this finding would have significant clinical and public health impacts.The Journal of pediatrics 08/2012; · 4.02 Impact Factor -
Article: A pilot open label prospective study of memantine monotherapy in adults with ADHD.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objectives. Available pharmacotherapies treat some adults with ADHD inadequately. A small literature suggests that glutamate modulation could have effects on ADHD. Methods. Memantine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, was titrated to a maximum dose of 10 mg BID in 34 adult subjects aged 18-55 who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD or ADHD NOS on structured interview. Twenty-eight subjects completed 12 weeks exposure. The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report (AISRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), a neuropsychological battery sensitive to domains of executive function, and the CANTAB cognitive battery were administered. Paired t-tests compared treated and baseline scores. Results. At week 12, AISRS data showed reduction in total symptoms (-17.5, P < 0.001), inattentive symptoms (-10.6, P < 0.001), and hyperactive symptoms (-6.9, P < 0.01). A total of 44% of subjects had CGI ratings of much or very much improved. Cognitive performance improved in measures of attention, working memory, and other selected executive domains by weeks 6 and 12 (each P < 0.05); simple reaction time declined by week 12 (P < 0.05). There were no severe adverse events, but mild adverse events were common and six subjects discontinued due to adverse effects. Conclusions. Memantine was largely well-tolerated and associated with improvement in ADHD symptoms and neuropsychological performance. Randomized studies are indicated to confirm whether memantine is a novel therapy for ADHD across the lifespan.The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 03/2012; · 2.38 Impact Factor -
Article: A prospective open-label trial of quetiapine monotherapy in preschool and school age children with bipolar spectrum disorder.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although bipolar disorder frequently onsets in the preschool years, treatment studies to guide management of these highly dysfunctional children are limited. This study evaluates the response to quetiapine monotherapy in preschool and school age children with bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD). Two eight-week, prospective, open-label trials utilizing identical methodology to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of quetiapine monotherapy in the treatment of BSD in preschool (age 4-6 years) and school age children (age 6-15 years). Forty-nine children (30 preschool and 19 school age) with BSD (Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] at entry: 34.5±5.5 and 30±6.5 respectively) were enrolled and 34 (20 preschool and 14 school age) completed the trial. Quetiapine was titrated to a mean endpoint dose of 175.8±63.8 mg/day in preschool and 248.7±153.1 mg/day in school age children. At endpoint, treatment with quetiapine was associated with similar and statistically significant improvement in mean YMRS scores in preschool (-14.5±11.5, p<0.001) and school age (-13±9.8, p<0.001) children. Quetiapine was generally well tolerated with treatment limiting adverse-events observed in 3/30 preschool and 1/19 school age children. Quetiapine monotherapy in preschool and school age children was associated with significant weight gain (+3.1±1.8 and +7.4±7.7 lb respectively, p<0.001) and with clinically insignificant changes in vital signs. As an uncontrolled study, the assessments were not blind to treatment and the effects of treatment cannot be separated from time. Open-label quetiapine treatment was beneficial for the treatment of BSD in preschool and school age children. Further controlled trials are warranted.Journal of affective disorders 02/2012; 136(3):1143-53. · 3.76 Impact Factor -
Article: Discriminant and concurrent validity of a simplified DSM-based structured diagnostic instrument for the assessment of autism spectrum disorders in youth and young adults.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the concurrent and discriminant validity of a brief DSM-based structured diagnostic interview for referred individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). To test concurrent validity, we assessed the structured interview's agreement in 123 youth with the expert clinician assessment and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Discriminant validity was examined using 1563 clinic-referred youth. The structured diagnostic interview and SRS were highly sensitive indicators of the expert clinician assessment. Equally strong was the agreement between the structured interview and SRS. We found evidence for high specificity for the structured interview. A simplified DSM-based ASD structured diagnostic interview could serve as a useful diagnostic aid in the assessment of subjects with ASDs in clinical and research settings.BMC Psychiatry 12/2011; 11:204. · 2.55 Impact Factor -
Article: A randomized, single-blind, substitution study of OROS methylphenidate (Concerta) in ADHD adults receiving immediate release methylphenidate.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The main aim of this study was to examine the efficacy, tolerability, and compliance of an extended-release formulation of methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) in adults with ADHD receiving immediate-release methylphenidate (IR-MPH). Participants were outpatient adults with ADHD who were stable on IR-MPH-administered TID. Participants were randomized (4:1) to equipotent doses of OROS-MPH or to continue IR-MPH and were assessed weekly for 6 weeks with the Adult ADHD Investigator System Symptom Report Scale (AISRS). Randomization of 53 IR-MPH responders to IR- or OROS-MPH had no effect on AISRS score at endpoint (11.2 ± 6.9 vs. 10.7 ± 5.1, p = .8). Participants stabilized on IR-MPH and switched to OROS-MPH remained satisfied over 71% of the time. However, the IR-MPH group missed more doses (7.3 ± 6.8 vs. 3.3 ± 4.2, p = .02) than the OROS-MPH group. Findings showed that adults with ADHD can be successfully switched from an effective regimen of IR-MPH TID to once-daily OROS-MPH. Results also demonstrated better compliance with OROS-MPH than with IR-MPH treatment.Journal of Attention Disorders 05/2011; 15(4):286-94. · 2.45 Impact Factor
