René Schenkendorf
Research interests
-
InterestsStructural Analysis, Modeling, Simulation, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Analysis, Flatness based control, Kalman Filtering, Global Parameter Sensitivities
Research experience
-
Teaching: Exercise in "Signals and Systems"
-
Sep 2009–
Sep 2012Research: MODEXA
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems · PSPD · Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical SystemsOptimal Design · MagdeburgModel-based Methods for the Optimal Design of Stimulus Experiments and Dynamic Analysis of Signal Transdutction Processes -
Mar 2007–
Aug 2009Research: Forschungszentrum fuer Dynamische Systeme in Biomedizin und Prozesstechnik, Sachsen-Anhalt
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems · PSPD · Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical SystemsMagdeburg -
Dec 2005–
Apr 2006Research: Internship
Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · Netzwerkanalyse · Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK)Netzwerkanalyse · GaterslebenNetwork Analysis, Network Centralities, Programming
Education
-
Oct 2001–
Feb 2007Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Technical Cybernetics · Dipl.-Ing.Magdeburg
Other
-
Journal RefereeBioSystems - Elsevier;
Chemical Engineering Science - Elsevier;
Publications
-
Parameter identification of time-delay systems: A flatness based approach
Mathmod 2012 - 7th Vienna International Conference on Mathematical Modelling; 02/2012
-
Qualitative and Quantitative Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Identification of a MAP Kinase Model
18th IFAC World Congress; 09/2011
-
0.59Impact points
Influence of non-linearity to the optimal experimental design demonstrated by a biological system
Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems. 01/2011;
-
Challenges of Parameter Identification for Nonlinear Biological and Chemical Systems
SIAM Conference on Optimization; 01/2011
-
2.38Impact points
Optimal experimental design with the sigma point method.
IET systems biology. 02/2009; 3(1):10.
Using mathematical models for a quantitative description of dynamical systems requires the identification of uncertain parameters by minimising the difference between simulation and measurement. Owing to the measurement noise also, the estimated parameters possess an uncertainty expressed by their v... [more] Using mathematical models for a quantitative description of dynamical systems requires the identification of uncertain parameters by minimising the difference between simulation and measurement. Owing to the measurement noise also, the estimated parameters possess an uncertainty expressed by their variances. To obtain highly predictive models, very precise parameters are needed. The optimal experimental design (OED) as a numerical optimisation method is used to reduce the parameter uncertainty by minimising the parameter variances iteratively. A frequently applied method to define a cost function for OED is based on the inverse of the Fisher information matrix. The application of this traditional method has at least two shortcomings for models that are nonlinear in their parameters: (i) it gives only a lower bound of the parameter variances and (ii) the bias of the estimator is neglected. Here, the authors show that by applying the sigma point (SP) method a better approximation of characteristic values of the parameter statistics can be obtained, which has a direct benefit on OED. An additional advantage of the SP method is that it can also be used to investigate the influence of the parameter uncertainties on the simulation results. The SP method is demonstrated for the example of a widely used biological model.
-
Optimal Experimental Design and Model Selection by a Sigma Point Approach
Mathmod 2009 - 6th Vienna International Conference on Mathematical Modelling, VIenna, Austria; 01/2009
The identification of a model structure, i.e., the relationship of model components, and the usually unknown model parameters are essential to get meaningful deterministic models. Due to imperfect and limited measurement data to fulfil both requirements can be a challenging task. Therefore, the Opti... [more] The identification of a model structure, i.e., the relationship of model components, and the usually unknown model parameters are essential to get meaningful deterministic models. Due to imperfect and limited measurement data to fulfil both requirements can be a challenging task. Therefore, the Optimal Experimental Design (OED) was introduced to detect some optimal stimuli of the regarded system, that increase the information content of measurements. For models which are linear with respect to their parameters, the OED is well known to reduce the influence of measurement noise to the parameter estimation process and to find conditions that make the difference of competing model hypothesis more obvious. Unfortunately, in practise the most used models are non-linear with respect to their parameters. The established methods for the linear case, e.g. the Fisher Information matrix (FIM), can lead to a crude approximation of the non-linearity that results at best in a sub-optimal choice of the system stimuli. The usage of sample based approaches, e.g. Monte Carlo methods, seems to be more suitable to consider non-linear effects, but their inherent computational effort prohibits the application in the framework of Optimal Experimental Design. In this work, the Sigma Point method is used instead, because its advantages are at least threefold for OED: 1) a more reliable approximation of parameter uncertainties can be achieved, 2) a definition of a novel design criterion for OED becomes possible, and 3) it provides an efficient and elegant way to take the imperfection of parameter estimation in the field of model selection into account. All three aspects are demonstrated for the example of a biological substrate uptake model.
-
2.14Impact points
Two State Estimation for the Barium Sulfat Precipitation in a Semi-Batch Reactor
Chemical Engineering Science. 01/2009; 64:646-660.
-
A Sigma Point Method for Optimal Experimental Design
The 20th International Symposium on Chemical Reactor Engineering (ISCRE 20); 01/2008
Following (18)
-
André Franz
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems -
Raheem Gul
Freie Universität Berlin -
Johannes W. Dietrich
Ruhr-Universität Bochum -
Pavel Hering
University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic -
Markus Groetsch
Proton Motor Fuel Cell GmbH