Topics (14) View all

Skills (7)

Publications (50) View all

  • Article: 3.0T Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Performed With 32-Channel Cardiac Coils: A Single-Center Experience.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background- Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a promising method for noninvasive, radiation-free detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease; however, the required imaging time and robustness of the technique are not yet satisfactory. We evaluated the value of whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T using a 32-channel cardiac coil, which reduces image-acquisition times and hence allows to increase the clinical throughput. Methods and Results- A total of 110 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for clinically indicated conventional coronary angiography were included in this prospective study. Acquisition of 3.0T coronary MRA data was done by using 32-channel receiver coils. An ECG-triggered, navigator-gated, inversion-recovery prepared, segmented gradient-echo sequence was used for image acquisition with an acceleration factor of 3 in the phase-encoding direction using generalized auto calibrating partially parallel acquisitions reconstruction. Acquisition of coronary MRA was successfully completed in 101 of 110 (92%) patients with average imaging time of 7.0±1.8 minutes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of coronary MRA on a patient-based analysis were 95.9% (47/49, 95% CI, 86.0%-99.4%), 86.5% (45/52, 95% CI, 74.2%-94.4%), 87.0% (47/54, 95% CI, 75.1%-94.6%) and 95.7% (45/47, 95% CI, 85.4%-99.4%), respectively. Conclusions- Whole-heart coronary MRA at 3.0T using a 32-channel cardiac coil allows high overall accuracy for detecting significant coronary artery disease with reduced imaging time. It has potential to be a robust and alternative technique for ruling out significant coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-DDT-07000121.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging 08/2012; 5(5):573-9. · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Accuracy of MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the ability of black-blood coronary arterial wall MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the golden standard. Nineteen consecutive patients underwent IVUS and coronary artery wall MRI. Cross-sectional images were acquired on the lesion of coronary artery from the ostium to the middle segment continuously. The vessel cross-sectional area (CSA), luminal CSA, plaque burden, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in each slice which was then compared with the IVUS images. Sixteen of 19 patients completed coronary artery MRA and wall imaging. 41 of 67 slices were found plaques on both IVUS and MRI; The maximal wall thickness, plaque burden, SNR, CNR in the coronary wall containing plaque were greater compared with the normal coronary wall (1.70 ± 0.51 versus 1.24 ± 0.24; 0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.12; 1.86 ± 0.41 versus 1.47 ± 0.23; 5.10 ± 2.21 versus 2.99 ± 1.17; respectively, P < 0.05). The matched MRI and IVUS showed good correlation for vessel CSA (16.77 ± 10.67 versus 16.97 ± 8.36; r = 0.79; P < 0.01), luminal CSA (5.18 ± 5.01 versus 7.13 ± 5.14; r = 0.88; P < 0.01), plaque burden (0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.15; r = 0.67; P < 0.01). in segments containing plaques, especially the luminal CSA were strongly correlated. MRI coronary artery wall imaging can identify coronary plaque in the proximal segments. It also has the potential to assess coronary artery size.
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 01/2012; 35(1):72-8. · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • Article: Accuracy of MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque: A comparative study with intravascular ultrasound
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose:To evaluate the ability of black-blood coronary arterial wall MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the golden standard.Materials and Methods:Nineteen consecutive patients underwent IVUS and coronary artery wall MRI. Cross-sectional images were acquired on the lesion of coronary artery from the ostium to the middle segment continuously. The vessel cross-sectional area (CSA), luminal CSA, plaque burden, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in each slice which was then compared with the IVUS images.Results:Sixteen of 19 patients completed coronary artery MRA and wall imaging. 41 of 67 slices were found plaques on both IVUS and MRI; The maximal wall thickness, plaque burden, SNR, CNR in the coronary wall containing plaque were greater compared with the normal coronary wall (1.70 ± 0.51 versus 1.24 ± 0.24; 0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.12; 1.86 ± 0.41 versus 1.47 ± 0.23; 5.10 ± 2.21 versus 2.99 ± 1.17; respectively, P < 0.05). The matched MRI and IVUS showed good correlation for vessel CSA (16.77 ± 10.67 versus 16.97 ± 8.36; r = 0.79; P < 0.01), luminal CSA (5.18 ± 5.01 versus 7.13 ± 5.14; r = 0.88; P < 0.01), plaque burden (0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.15; r = 0.67; P < 0.01). in segments containing plaques, especially the luminal CSA were strongly correlated.Conclusion:MRI coronary artery wall imaging can identify coronary plaque in the proximal segments. It also has the potential to assess coronary artery size. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:72-78. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 12/2011; 35(1):72 - 78. · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: The relative atrial volume ratio and late gadolinium enhancement provide additive information to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The differentiation of constrictive pericarditis (CP) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is often difficult. This study sought to determine the clinical utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for differentiating both these disorders. Twenty-three patients with surgically documented CP, 22 patients with RCM and 25 normal subjects were included in the study. CMR yielded information about cardiac morphology, function and tissue characteristics. The left (LA) and right atrial (RA) volume was calculated using the area-length method. The relative atrial volume ratio (RAR) was defined as the LA volume divided by RA volume. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to test the ability of different variables in differentiating CP from RCM. The maximal pericardial thickness in CP patients was significantly larger than in normal subjects and RCM patients. The RA volume index in RCM patients (90.5 ± 35.3 mL/m2) was significantly larger than in CP patients (71.4 ± 15.7 mL/m2, p = 0.006) and normal subjects (38.1 ± 9.0 mL/m2, p < 0.001). The LA volume index in RCM (96.0 ± 37.0 mL/m2) and CP patients (105.6 ± 25.1 mL/m2) was significantly larger than in normal subjects (39.5 ± 9.5 mL/m2, p < 0.001 for all). The RAR in CP patients (1.50 ± 0.29) was significantly larger than in RCM patients (1.12 ± 0.33, p < 0.001) and normal subjects (1.06 ± 0.20, p < 0.001). There were no differences between RCM patients and normal subjects in the RAR (p = 0.452). At a cut-off value of 1.32 for the RAR, the sensitivity was 82.6%, and the specificity was 86.4% in the detection of CP. Septal bounce was identified in 95.7% CP patients, in none of RCM patients and normal subjects. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was present in 31.8% RCM patients and absence in all CP patients and normal subjects. CMR with LGE and RAR can facilitate differentiation of CP from RCM.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 02/2011; 13:15. · 3.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion MRI using SW-CG-HYPR with whole left ventricular coverage: comparison of results with X-ray angiography in patients with suspected CAD
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 01/2011;

Following (1) See all

Followers (8) See all