Publications (17) View all
-
Article: Biallelic inactivation of NF1 in a sporadic plexiform neurofibroma.
Eline Beert, Hilde Brems, Marleen Renard, Julio Finalet Ferreiro, Cindy Melotte, Reinhilde Thoelen, Ivo De Wever, Raf Sciot, Eric Legius, Maria Debiec-Rychter[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Plexiform neurofibromas are a major cause of morbidity in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Sporadically, these tumors appear as an isolated feature without other signs of NF1. A role for the NF1 gene in solitary plexiform neurofibromas has never been described. In this study, we report a 13-year-old boy who was diagnosed with a plexiform neurofibroma, without other NF1 diagnostic criteria. The tumor was partially resected and analyzed using different techniques: karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Tumor Schwann cell culture and subsequent karyotyping showed a rearrangement involving chromosomes 1 and 17, namely an insertion of chromosomal bands 1p36-35 at 17q11.2. FISH demonstrated that the insertion interrupted the NF1 gene. In addition, a deletion was detected affecting the other NF1 allele. Whole-genome aCGH analysis of the resected tumor confirmed the presence of an 8.28 Mb deletion including the NF1 gene locus in ∼15-20% of tumor cells. We conclude that biallelic NF1 inactivation was at the origin of the isolated plexiform neurofibroma in this patient. The insertion is most likely the "first hit" and the large deletion the "second hit."Genes Chromosomes and Cancer 05/2012; 51(9):852-7. · 3.31 Impact Factor -
Article: Parental insertional balanced translocations are an important cause of apparently de novo CNVs in patients with developmental anomalies.
Beata A Nowakowska, Nicole de Leeuw, Claudia Al Ruivenkamp, Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz, John A Crolla, Reinhilde Thoelen, Marije Koopmans, Nicolette den Hollander, Arie van Haeringen, Anne-Marie van der Kevie-Kersemaekers, Rolph Pfundt, Hanneke Mieloo, Ton van Essen, Bert B A de Vries, Andrew Green, Willie Reardon, Jean-Pierre Fryns, Joris R Vermeesch[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In several laboratories, genome-wide array analysis has been implemented as the first tier diagnostic test for the identification of copy number changes in patients with mental retardation and/or congenital anomalies. The identification of a pathogenic copy number variant (CNV) is not only important to make a proper diagnosis but also to enable the accurate estimation of the recurrence risk to family members. Upon the identification of a de novo interstitial loss or gain, the risk recurrence is considered very low. However, this risk is 50% if one of the parents is carrier of a balanced insertional translocation (IT). The apparently de novo imbalance in a patient is then the consequence of the unbalanced transmission of a derivative chromosome involved in an IT. To determine the frequency with which insertional balanced translocations would be the origin of submicroscopic imbalances, we investigated the potential presence of an IT in a consecutive series of 477 interstitial CNVs, in which the parental origin has been tested by FISH, among 14,293 patients with developmental abnormalities referred for array. We demonstrate that ITs underlie ~2.1% of the apparently de novo, interstitial CNVs, indicating that submicroscopic ITs are at least sixfold more frequent than cytogenetically visible ITs. This risk estimate should be taken into account during counseling, and warrant parental and proband FISH testing wherever possible in patients with an apparently de novo, interstitial aberration.European journal of human genetics: EJHG 09/2011; 20(2):166-70. · 3.56 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central
Article: Direct fluorescent labelling of clones by DOP PCR.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (array CGH) is a powerful technique for the analysis of constitutional chromosomal anomalies. Chromosomal duplications or deletions detected by array CGH need subsequently to be validated by other methods. One method of validation is Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH). Traditionally, fluorophores or hapten labelling is performed by nick translation or random prime labelling of purified Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) products. However, since the array targets have been generated from Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed (DOP) amplified BAC clones, we aimed to use these DOP amplified BAC clones as the basis of an automated FISH labelling protocol. Unfortunately, labelling of DOP amplified BAC clones by traditional labelling methods resulted in high levels of background. We designed an improved labelling method, by means of degenerate oligonucleotides that resulted in optimal FISH probes with low background. We generated an improved labelling method for FISH which enables the rapid generation of FISH probes without the need for isolating BAC DNA. We labelled about 900 clones with this method with a success rate of 97%.Molecular Cytogenetics 02/2008; 1:3. -
Article: Direct fluorescent labelling of clones by DOP PCR
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract Background Array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (array CGH) is a powerful technique for the analysis of constitutional chromosomal anomalies. Chromosomal duplications or deletions detected by array CGH need subsequently to be validated by other methods. One method of validation is Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation (FISH). Traditionally, fluorophores or hapten labelling is performed by nick translation or random prime labelling of purified Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) products. However, since the array targets have been generated from Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed (DOP) amplified BAC clones, we aimed to use these DOP amplified BAC clones as the basis of an automated FISH labelling protocol. Unfortunately, labelling of DOP amplified BAC clones by traditional labelling methods resulted in high levels of background. Results We designed an improved labelling method, by means of degenerate oligonucleotides that resulted in optimal FISH probes with low background. Conclusion We generated an improved labelling method for FISH which enables the rapid generation of FISH probes without the need for isolating BAC DNA. We labelled about 900 clones with this method with a success rate of 97%.Molecular Cytogenetics. 01/2008; -
SourceAvailable from: Joris Vermeesch
Article: Large deletions of the APC gene in 15% of mutation-negative patients with classical polyposis (FAP): a Belgian study.
Geneviève Michils, Sabine Tejpar, Reinhilde Thoelen, Eric van Cutsem, Joris Robert Vermeesch, Jean-Pierre Fryns, Eric Legius, Gert Matthijs[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germline mutations of the APC gene are responsible for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Most of the mutations are protein truncating mutations and are spread over the coding region. Rare whole-gene deletions or exonic deletions have been described. From a series of 85 patients clinically diagnosed with FAP or attenuated FAP (AAPC) in our center, 30 (35%) were found to have truncating or missense mutations. We have now screened the remaining 55 patients for exonic deletions or duplications, first by semi-quantitative PCR and later by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Three whole-gene deletions and one exon 14 deletion were found (5% of patients). The whole-gene deletions were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, and the breakpoints of the exon 14 deletion could be determined using long range PCR. Further characterization of the whole gene deletions was performed using extragenic polymorphic markers and/or semi-quantitative PCR. We could demonstrate that the deletions do not encompass the MCC gene. Interestingly, the phenotype of the deletion patients was not different from that of patients with truncating mutations. The polyp numbers ranged from attenuated to profuse polyposis and the interfamilial variability of disease phenotype was as in other FAP families. In none of the 28 AAPC patients included in this study, was a large deletion found, while 15% of the patients with classical polyposis had a genomic deletion. It corroborates recently published data, suggesting that large deletions may occur with a frequency higher than 10% in mutation-negative patients with a classical polyposis. In this article, we have included an overview of genomic rearrangements in the 5q21 region.Human Mutation 03/2005; 25(2):125-34. · 5.69 Impact Factor