| a |
| a |
| a |
| a |
39.05
Skills (4)
-
11 Questions668 Followers
-
20 Questions1227 Followers
-
38 Questions3204 Followers
-
62 Questions3053 Followers
Research experience
-
Oct 2005–
Sep 2007Research: Michigan Technological University
Michigan Technological University · Department of PhysicsUSA · Houghton -
Oct 2004–
presentResearch: Uppsala University
Uppsala University · Department of Physics and AstronomySweden · Uppsala -
Jan 2000–
May 2004Research: University at Albany, The State University of New York
University at Albany, The State University of New York · Department of PhysicsUSA · Albany, NY
Awards & achievements
-
Aug 2011Award: Benzelius Prize of the Royal Society of Sciences in Uppsala
Other
-
LanguagesGerman, English, Swedish
-
Scientific MembershipsAmerican Physical Society (APS), Materials Research Society (MRS), High Pressure Science Society of America (HiPSSA)
-
Journal RefereesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Advanced Engineering Materials, Nano Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, ACS Nano, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Langmuir, Trends in Biotechnology (Elsevier), Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, ChemPhysChem (Wiley-VCH), Nanotechnology (IOP), Chemical Physics Letters, Chinese journal of chemical physics, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Physica B (Elsevier), Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids (Elsevier), MRS bulletin / Materials Research Society
Questions and Answers (34) View all
-
Answer added in Experimental Particle Physics31 Would anti-matter fly upwards in Earth's gravitational field?By Ralph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityRalph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityThanks for all the answers and comments. I want to remark that, as indeed Rolfe pointed out already above, the equivalence principle would require tha... [more]Thanks for all the answers and comments. I want to remark that, as indeed Rolfe pointed out already above, the equivalence principle would require that even negative mass falls "down" (towards Earth). - Simply speaking, one could see that from F (the gravitational force) being the opposite direction for negative masses (pointing "away" from Earth), but then due to a=F/m, the acceleration would be again pointing "towards" Earth, thus causing negative masses to fall down as well. ... But in terms of Coulomb interactions, positron and electron clearly attract each other, so here the negative mass concept does not fit in, so the picture of a hole in a sea of negatively charged electrons seems to give the wrong idea.Following
-
Answer added in Experimental Particle Physics31 Would anti-matter fly upwards in Earth's gravitational field?By Ralph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityRalph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityJames: Oppenheimer rightly pointed out that positrons (what Dirac predicted) are not protons. - Regarding the ion trail: one could think of a positron... [more]James: Oppenheimer rightly pointed out that positrons (what Dirac predicted) are not protons. - Regarding the ion trail: one could think of a positron as being an electron moving backwards in time. In that case, the curvature of the trajectory due to the magnetic field would be the opposite direction as that for a negatively charged particle (electron) traveling forward in time.Following
-
Answer added in Experimental Particle Physics31 Would anti-matter fly upwards in Earth's gravitational field?By Ralph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityRalph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityThanks for the answers so far. But if you read e.g. the Wikipedia article about positrons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron then one could certain... [more]Thanks for the answers so far. But if you read e.g. the Wikipedia article about positrons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron then one could certainly get away from it with the idea that positrons possess negative energy and would thus gravitationally repel ordinary matter, no? (On the other hand, they might still fall in Earth's gravitational field, if one considers F=m*a where in the mass is negative, but since the direction of force is inverted, the acceleration would still be "downwards".)Following
-
Question asked in Experimental Particle Physics31 Would anti-matter fly upwards in Earth's gravitational field?Last Monday, I listened to a very exciting talk here by Jeffrey Hangst from Århus University in Denmark, talking about their ALPHA antihydrogen exper... [more]Last Monday, I listened to a very exciting talk here by Jeffrey Hangst from Århus University in Denmark, talking about their ALPHA antihydrogen experiment at CERN. Unfortunately, I had to leave early, so what I did not fully understand is why one would expect that anti-hydrogen (or generally any anti-matter) would be differently affected by gravitational fields than regular hydrogen (or regular matter). If a positron has positive energy (positive rest mass), then it should react just like an ordinary electron in a gravitational field (fall "down"). Positron-electron annihilation seems to suggest that to me (i.e., that a positron possesses positive rest mass / positive energy). But then there is the picture of Dirac in my mind, with a positron being like a "hole" in a sea of electrons, effectively a "missing" electron, and the energy generated in the annihilation process comes from an electron falling essentially twice the energy "distance" to the zero energy line and into the negative energy regime. In that case, yes, I could see how a positron (and by analogy, anti-matter in general) could have negative mass and fly "up" in a gravitational field. Also, in Feynman diagrams, one interpretation of positrons could be that they are effectively electrons traveling backwards in time. Hence, naively speaking, a movie running backwards showing an electron falling down in a gravitational field would show the opposite movement (flying upward) for the thus depicted positron. - So, for the experts out here: what are your expectations for the outcome of the anti-hydrogen experiment? What are the more thorough theoretical predictions and arguments for it being one way or the other?By Ralph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityFollowing
-
Question asked in Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction64 How precise can one really determine crystal lattice constants with X-ray diffraction?In published articles, we typically see lattice constants from X-ray diffraction and subsequent refinement given in precision up to 0.00001 Å (or, in... [more]In published articles, we typically see lattice constants from X-ray diffraction and subsequent refinement given in precision up to 0.00001 Å (or, in other words, 1 femtometer). Is such a high precision possible due to the measurement process (Bragg scattering) effectively being based on interference? What is slightly bugging me is that we achieve a resolution of the atomic positions (in a perfectly periodic lattice) which is typically five orders of magnitude smaller than the wavelength of the used photons (around 1 Å for X-rays). So, is the refinement to 0.00001 Å precision really meaningful? I am curious to hear what experts on X-ray crystallography have to say on this.By Ralph Scheicher · Uppsala UniversityFollowing
Publications (69) View all
-
Article: First principles electronic structure investigation of order of singlet and triplet states of oxyhemoglobin and analysis of possible influence of muon trapping
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Interest in the possibility of magnetic character for oxyhemoglobin (OxyHb) has been recently stimulated by the observations of muon spin-lattice relaxation effects studied (Nagamine et al., Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 83:120–126, 2007) with the muon-spin rotation (μSR) technique. In view of this, we have carried out first-principles electronic structure investigations involving Hartree–Fock theory combined with many body perturbation effects for the singlet and triplet states of OxyHb. Our results indicate that using two recent x-ray structural data (Paoli et al., J Mol Biol 256:775, 1996; Park et al., J Mol Biol 360:690, 2006) for OxyHb, for only Hartree–Fock theory without many-body effects included, the singlet state lies above the triplet state by energies of about 0.08 and 0.13 a.u. for the two structures in Paoli et al. (J Mol Biol 256:775, 1996) and Park et al. (J Mol Biol 360:690, 2006). Incorporation of many-body effects by the perturbation method reverses the order, with the triplet state located 0.18 and 0.14 a.u. above the singlet state for the structures in Paoli et al. (J Mol Biol 256:775, 1996) and Park et al. (J Mol Biol 360:690, 2006). Physical reasons for these relative orderings of the singlet and triplet states will be discussed. It is clear that OxyHb by itself would be in a singlet state at room temperature or below, since from our calculation, the triplet state lies about KT above the singlet state with T having the value of 44,098 K and 56,449 K for the two structural data in Paoli et al. (J Mol Biol 256:775, 1996) and Park et al. (J Mol Biol 360:690, 2006). As regards the muon spin-lattice relaxation effects obtained by recent μSR measurements (by Nagamine et al., Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 83:120–126, 2007) at room temperature, the sensitive dependence of the singlet-triplet separation on many-body effects in our investigation suggests that it is possible that the singlet-triplet separation could be reversed or reduced significantly when a muon is trapped near an oxygen atom of the oxygen molecule, allowing the triplet to be occupied at room temperature and lead to significant muon spin-lattice relaxation. KeywordsOxyhemoglobin–Magnetic susceptability–Singlet–Triplet–Muon–Muon spin relaxation–Hartree–Fock–Many bodyHyperfine Interactions 04/2012; 197(1):331-340. · 0.21 Impact Factor -
Article: First-principles cluster study of electronic structures, locations and hyperfine interactions of isolated atoms and ions in silicon
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The electronic structures of the dilute transition metal (TM) impurities, V2 + , Cr + , Mn2 + , and Mn0 in silicon have been studied using the Hartree–Fock (HF) procedure combined with many-body perturbation theory (MBPT). The systems studied involved the TM impurities at the hexagonal interstitial (H i ), tetrahedral interstitial (T i ) and substitutional (S) locations. Investigations of the binding energy and local potential energy surface of the TM impurity-Si systems indicate that the TM impurities are binding at the T i location. Hyperfine interaction constants (A) of the TM impurities at the T i and S sites are presented and compared with available experimental results (Woodbury and Ludwig, J Phys Rev 117:102, 1960a, Phys Rev Lett 5:98, b) from Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) measurements. KeywordsMagnetic semiconductors–Transition metal impurities–Binding energies–Trapping sites–Hyperfine interactionsHyperfine Interactions 04/2012; 197(1):37-41. · 0.21 Impact Factor -
Article: Ab initio Study of Lithium Doped Graphane for Hydrogen Storage
Europhysics Letter. 01/2011; EPL:27013. -
SourceAvailable from: Muhammad Ramzan
Article: Structural and energetic analysis of the hydrogen storage materials LiNH_ {2} BH_ {3} and NaNH_ {2} BH_ {3} from ab initio calculations
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ammonia borane (NH3BH3) possesses many appealing properties as a hydrogen storage material; however, the release of trace amounts of borazine during the desorption process is troublesome. Recently, it was found that substitution of one of the H atoms in the NH3 group by Li or Na could significantly improve the hydrogen desorption properties. The resulting lithium amidoborane (LiNH2BH3) and sodium amidoborane (NaNH2BH3) compounds have been studied by us using density-functional theory. Specifically, we have succeeded in determining the detailed crystal structures of LiNH2BH3 and NaNH2BH3, including the atomic positions in their respective unit cells. Calculated hydrogen removal energies of the hydrogen release reactions are found to be in good agreement with the experimental trend.Physical Review B 04/2009; 79(13). · 3.69 Impact Factor -
Article: Stability of ferromagnetic phase in Fe-doped AlH3
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We have carried out a systematic theoretical investigation of Fe-doped AlH3 to study its magnetic properties and to assess the stability of the ferromagnetic phase in this material. All calculations were performed using the projector augmented-wave method and generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) as well as GGA+U. The magnetic moment is found to be constant at 1.1 μB per Fe-atom in the ferromagnetic configuration for distances between adjacent Fe atoms varying from 3.25°A to 7.41°A. We conclude that the ferromagnetic phase in Fe-doped AlH3 is stable both for near and far configurations of Fe. The stability of the ferromagnetic phase is due to the holes created by Fe-doping and the larger level splitting of the interacting gap states within the ferromagnetic phase.EPL (Europhysics Letters) 01/2009; 85:67006. · 2.17 Impact Factor
About
Ab initio studies of nano-bio hybrid systems, with focus either on the nanomaterial (such as in DNA-wrapped nanotubes) or on the biomolecule (such as in nanopore-based DNA sequencing). Furthermore, investigating metal hydrides, both for fundamental physics interests (pressure-induced metallization and superconductivity) as well as for potentially useful applications (hydrogen storage under ambient conditions).