Publications (148) View all
-
Article: Incidence of Pneumothorax During Tissue Expander-Implant Reconstruction and Algorithm for Intraoperative Management.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pneumothorax is a serious intraoperative complication of immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. However, there is paucity of literature regarding incidence or management of intraoperative pneumothorax in the breast reconstruction patient population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review on prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders from 1992 to 2012 to determine institutional incidence. We also searched the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1998 to 2008 to determine national incidence. RESULTS: A total of 9653 tissue expanders were placed in 6955 patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1992 and 2012. There were 3 cases of pneumothorax during immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. The incidence of pneumothorax is 0.03% per expander and 0.04% per patient. From the national database, there were 153 cases of pneumothorax during immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders in 27,612 patients. The overall national incidence of pneumothorax is 0.55% per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm for management includes a thoracic surgery consultation intraoperatively. A chest tube should be placed at a site distal to the pleurotomy. The site of injury should be repaired primarily or patched as necessary. If the patient remains stable, it is safe to proceed with placement of the tissue expander.Annals of plastic surgery 05/2013; · 1.29 Impact Factor -
Article: Measuring Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A qualitative study was undertaken to understand the impact of omitted health concepts in existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) evaluation following head and neck (H&N) cancer reconstruction. Twenty-six patients were interviewed. Patients described a broad range of symptoms. Oral competence, rhinorrhea, facial sensation, smile, vision and eye discharge are missing from existing PRO instruments. Altered appearance was a major stressor; both function and appearance changes had a negative psychosocial impact leading to social isolation and embarrassment. This framework is the foundation for development of a more complete PRO instrument, the FACE-Q Oncology.Clinics in plastic surgery 04/2013; 40(2):341-349. · 0.95 Impact Factor -
Article: A paradigm shift in u.s. Breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: : The aims of the current study were to (1) measure trends in the type of mastectomy performed, (2) evaluate sociodemographic/hospital characteristics of patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus unilateral mastectomies, and (3) analyze reconstruction rates and method used following different mastectomy types. : Mastectomies from 1998 to 2008 were analyzed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Mastectomies (n = 178,603) were classified as either unilateral, contralateral prophylactic, or bilateral prophylactic. Reconstructive procedures were categorized into either implant or autologous. Longitudinal trends were analyzed with Poisson regression and sociodemographic/hospital variables were analyzed with logistic regression. : Unilateral mastectomies decreased 2 percent per year, whereas contralateral and bilateral prophylactic mastectomies increased significantly by 15 and 12 percent per year, respectively (p < 0.01). Independent predictors for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (compared with unilateral mastectomy) were patients younger than 39 years, Caucasian and Hispanic race, private insurance carriers, treated in teaching hospitals, and from South and Midwest regions. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is the only group with increased reconstruction rates throughout the study period (p < 0.01). Although implant use increased for all mastectomy types, it remains greater in bilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. : There is increasing use of bilateral mastectomies in the United States, particularly in patients with unilateral cancer. Although implant use has increased for all mastectomy types, they are used most commonly following bilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Changing mastectomy patterns are one factor underlying the paradigm shift away from autologous tissue to implant-based reconstruction. : Risk, III.Plastic and reconstructive surgery 03/2013; 131(3):320e-6e. · 2.74 Impact Factor -
Article: Reply: The Rasch Model: "Litmus Test" de rigueur for Rating Scales?
Plastic and reconstructive surgery 02/2013; 131(2):286e-8e. · 2.74 Impact Factor -
Article: A paradigm shift in u.s. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: : Despite its benefits in body image, self-esteem, sexuality, and quality of life, historically fewer than 25 percent of patients undergo immediate breast reconstruction. After passage of the Women Health and Cancer Rights Act, studies failed to demonstrate changes in reconstructive rates. A recent single-year report suggests significant shifts in U.S. breast reconstruction patterns. The authors' goal was to assess long-term trends in rates and types of immediate reconstruction. : A serial cross-sectional study of immediate breast reconstruction trends was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1998 to 2008. Data on mastectomies, reconstructive method (autologous/implant), and sociodemographic/hospital predictors were obtained. : Immediate breast reconstruction rates increased on average 5 percent per year, from 20.8 percent to 37.8 percent (p < 0.01). Autologous reconstruction rates were unchanged. Implant use increased by an average of 11 percent per year (p < 0.01), surpassing autologous methods as the leading reconstructive modality after 2002. The strongest predictors of implant use were procedures performed after 2002, bilateral mastectomies, patients operated on in Midwest/West regions, and Medicare recipients. In contrast to bilateral mastectomies, which increased by 17 percent per year (p < 0.01), unilateral mastectomies decreased by 2 percent per year (p < 0.01). Bilateral mastectomy defects had significantly higher reconstruction rates than unilateral counterparts (p < 0.01). : The significant rise in immediate reconstruction rates in the United States correlates closely to a 203 percent expansion in implant use. Although the reason for the increase in implant use is multifactorial, changes in mastectomy patterns, such as increased use of bilateral mastectomies, are one important contributor.Plastic and reconstructive surgery 01/2013; 131(1):15-23. · 2.74 Impact Factor
