Publications (76) View all
-
Article: Endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplantation: schedule or event?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard to identify rejection after heart transplantation. Due to its invasiveness, discomfort, and difficult vascular access, some patients are not willing to accept routine scheduled biopsies years after heart transplantation. The purpose of this study was to identify whether there was a difference in outcomes among the scheduled versus event biopsy groups. We studied 411 patients who underwent heart transplantation from 1987 to 2011, reviewing biopsy results and pathology reports. There were 363 patients who followed the scheduled biopsy protocol, and 48 patients who were assigned to the event biopsy group. We extracted data on biopsy results, rejection episodes, rejection types, and survival time. The 2481 reviewed biopsies over 24 years, showed most rejection episodes (86.4%) to occur within 2 years after heart transplantation. The rejection incidence was low (2.1%) at 3 years after transplantation. The major reason for an event biopsy was poor vascular access, such as tiny central vein or congenital disease without a suitable central vein. Event biopsy group patients were younger than schedule biopsy patients (19.7 years old vs 47.6 years old; P < .05). The 10-year survival rates were 64% among the event versus 53% among the scheduled biopsy group (P = .029). The 10-year rates of freedom from rejection were similar. The rejection rate was low after 3 years; episodes occurred within 2 years. Although the long-term survival in the event group was better, they had a younger man age. The rejection and freedom from rejection rates were similar. As the rejection rate was low at 3 years after transplantation, we suggest that the event principle could be applied for biopsy at 3 years after heart transplantation.Transplantation Proceedings 05/2012; 44(4):894-6. · 1.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Steroid pulse therapy combined with plasmapheresis for clinically compromised patients after heart transplantation.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The most serious complication after heart transplantation is allograft dysfunction. Patients presenting with compromised hemodynamics show a high incidence of mortality. The most common reason for allograft dysfunction is rejection. We have employed steroid pulse therapy combined with plasmapheresis for hemodynamically compromised patients after heart transplantation. Steroid pulse therapy and plasmapheresis were performed on 35 patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation for graft dysfunction. Thus treatment rescued ventricular function and improved the ejection fraction in 77% of patients, among who ever 71.4% showed improved New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Steroid pulse therapy combined with plasmapheresis improved the cardiac contractility and NYHA functional class of most heart transplant recipients with graft dysfunction.Transplantation Proceedings 05/2012; 44(4):900-2. · 1.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis in heart transplantation.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Heart transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage heart failure. Cardiac sarcoidosis has rarely been reported in heart transplantation worldwide. Their long-term prognosis after heart transplantation is unknown. Herein we have presented clinical and pathological observations among heart transplantation patients with isolated cardiac sarcoidosis. From 1987 to 2011, we performed 411 heart transplantations including five patients retrospectively reviewed due to the presence of sarcoidosis and giant-cell cardiomyopathy in the recipient heart. Among the heart transplantations from 2003 to 2011, the four male and one female patients were ages 31 to 40 years. None of them had extra-cardiac sarcoidosis. All five subjects presented with dilated cardiomyopathy with patent coronary arteries. The commonest clinical presentations were atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmia, electrocardiographic findings of ST elevations, and poor left ventricular ejection fractions (17%-23%). All patients survived without allograft heart failure to date with the longest survivor at 8 years postoperatively. No recurrence of sarcoidosis has been observed clinically or among the post-heart transplantation endomyocardial biopsies. Heart transplantation is a useful treatment for isolated cardiac sarcoidosis patients suffering end-stage heart failure. Often the diagnosis is difficult to establish before heart transplantation despite endomyocardial biopsy. No recurrence of sarcoidosis was observed among the allografted hearts.Transplantation Proceedings 05/2012; 44(4):903-6. · 1.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Thoratec pneumatic ventricular assist devices as double bridge to heart transplantation.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ventricular assist devices have benefited patients with end-stage heart failure as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx). We present our experiment of HTx using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with Thoratec pneumatic ventricular assist device (TpVAD). From May 1996 to June 2011, among 410 patients who underwent HTx 23 required mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with implantation of the TpVAD and 15 (65%) of them received grafts. The 23 patients included 4 female and 19 male patients of age range 10 to 80 years. Eighteen (78%) of them needed ECMO before TpVAD implantation. Twelve (67%) were implanted with a TpVAD double bridge to HTx. The demand for MCS among patients with acute hemodynamic collapse has led to major improvements in the existing systems such as ECMO with double bridge to TpVAD. We used ECMO as a rescue procedure for acute hemodynamic deterioration. However, during ECMO support, left ventricular afterload increased. If prolonged support is required, TpVAD might be required: 15 (65%) of patients supported by ECMO with TpVAD needed to a wait a suitable donor. We recommend the application of ECMO for short-term support (within 1 week), and TpVAD as a bridge for medium- or long-term support.Transplantation Proceedings 05/2012; 44(4):878-80. · 1.00 Impact Factor -
Article: The influence of the organ allocation policy on a patient's chances of undergoing heart transplantation and the posttransplantation survival rate.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Taiwan Organ Registry and Sharing Center (TORSC) was established by the Department of Health on June 6, 2002. According to the organ allocation policy, the computer-based organ-matching program began on April 1, 2005. In order to encourage organ donations, "donor hospitals" were given the highest priority. On October 1, 2010, the TORSC implemented a new allocation policy allowing highest priority to the most critically ill patients listed as 1A status. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the allocation policy on the likelihood of undergoing a heart transplantation (HTx) as well as the survival after the procedure. Based on the timeline of changes in the organ allocation policy, the patients were divided into three groups: "individual decision," "donor hospital first," and "urgency status first." We observed the waiting time of status 1A patients to decrease and their chance to receive a donor heart increase but their survival rate after HTx to decrease. Further research is needed to define the optimal organ allocation policy.Transplantation Proceedings 05/2012; 44(4):881-2. · 1.00 Impact Factor
