Publications (53) View all
-
Article: A phase I dose-escalation study of intravenous panobinostat in patients with lymphoma and solid tumors.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Purpose Panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, is a promising anti-cancer agent that increases acetylation of proteins associated with growth and survival pathways of malignant cells. The primary objective of this phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous (i.v.) panobinostat administered on different dosing schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Secondary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetic profiles, and activities of the i.v. formulation. Methods i.v. panobinostat was administered at escalating doses on a daily (days 1-3 and 8-10 of a 21-day cycle; days 1-3 and 15-17 of a 28-day cycle) or weekly (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle; days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) schedule, and safety and tolerability were monitored. Serial blood samples were collected following dosing for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. Results The MTD for the daily administration schedule was 7.2 g/m(2), whereas the MTD for the weekly schedule was 20.0 mg/m(2). In addition to fatigue and cardiac arrhythmias, including prolonged QTcF, DLTs associated with the study drug were principally due to myelosuppressive effects. Maximum concentrations and bioavailability of i.v. panobinostat increased dose-proportionally across all doses evaluated. Conclusions Based on the results of this study and others, the i.v. formulation of panobinostat was well tolerated in many patients, but concerns remain regarding its potential suitability outside the study setting due to potential electrocardiogram abnormalities. Therefore, further development will focus on the panobinostat oral formulation.Investigational New Drugs 02/2013; · 3.36 Impact Factor -
Article: Phase I/IIa trial of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) administered orally in patients with refractory or advanced malignancies and sarcoma.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background Ridaforolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR with evidence of antitumor activity in an I.V. formulation. This multicenter, open-label, 3 + 3 design nonrandomized, dose-escalation, phase I/IIa trial was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic parameters, maximum tolerated dose, and antitumor activity of oral ridaforolimus.Patients and methodsPatients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors refractory to therapy were eligible. Seven different continuous and intermittent dosing regimens were examined.ResultsOne hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study among which 85 were patients with sarcoma. Stomatitis was the most common DLT observed. The dosing regimen, 40 mg QD 5 days/week, provided the best combination of cumulative dose, dose density, and cumulative exposure, and was the recommended dosing regimen for subsequent clinical development. PK was nonlinear, with less than proportional increases in day-1 blood AUC(0-∞) and C(max), particularly with doses >40 mg. The terminal half-life estimate of ridaforolimus (QD 5 40 mg) was 42.0 h, and the mean half-life ∼30-60 h. The clinical benefit rate, (complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥4 months was 24.5% for all patients and 27.1% for patients with sarcoma.Conclusion Oral ridaforolimus had an acceptable safety profile and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with sarcoma and other malignancies.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT00112372.Annals of Oncology 12/2012; · 6.43 Impact Factor -
Article: Erlotinib 'dosing-to-rash': a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the anticancer activity of erlotinib in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose dose is increased to that associated with a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity (i.e., target rash (TR)); to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of higher doses of erlotinib. Patients initially received erlotinib 150 mg per day. The dose was successively increased in each patient to that associated with a TR. Anticancer activity was evaluated. Plasma, skin, and hair were sampled for PK and PD studies. Erlotinib dose escalation to 200-475 mg per day was feasible in 38 (90%) of 42 patients. Twenty-four (57%) patients developed a TR, but 19 (79%) did so at 150 mg per day. Five (12%) patients, all of whom developed a TR, had a partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.61, 4.14); median PFS was 3.5 months and 1.9 months, respectively, for patients who did and did not experience a TR (hazard ratio, 0.51; P=0.051). Neither rash severity nor response correlated with erlotinib exposure. Intrapatient dose escalation of erlotinib does not appreciably increase the propensity to experience a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity, or appear to increase the anticancer activity of erlotinib in NSCLC.British Journal of Cancer 08/2011; 105(7):938-44. · 5.04 Impact Factor -
Article: Vascular disrupting agents (VDA) in oncology: advancing towards new therapeutic paradigms in the clinic.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Vascular Disrupting Agents (VDA) are a potential new class of oncology drugs that have garnered attention recently as a number of these agents have entered into Phase 2-3 studies. Currently available data suggest how the subsequent evolution of these agents into clinical practice may proceed, with new therapeutic paradigms based on similarities, differences and interactions with current standard of care agents. In particular, the broadly successful group of agents targeting angiogenesis through the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) pathway, can be contrasted to the VDAs that principally disrupt established tumor vasculature through a different set of molecular targets. Although the angiogenesis inhibitors may benchmark where other vascularly targeted agents such as VDAs may be successful, the differences in terms of efficacy and safety profiles lead to important differentiation in how VDAs are likely to be used. Although the majority of VDAs bind tubulin, significant differences also exist between VDAs and cytotoxic agents, including tubulin targeted agents such as taxanes and vinca alkyloids. Clinical trial data is now available for several VDAs allowing such assessment. Data of yet has been the strongest in NSCLC, with indications of how these drugs may be developed beneficially in subsets of patients such as those with squamous cell histology or at risk of bleeding events. Other indications being aggressively pursued include prostate carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, sarcomas and astrocytomas. The field also continues to advance with investigation into how to optimally schedule administration of VDAs and what effects might be class effects and/or markers of efficacy.Current drug targets 07/2011; 12(14):2009-15. · 3.93 Impact Factor -
Article: Are we ready to move away from nature?: the rapamycin story.
Targeted Oncology 06/2011; 6(2):63-4. · 3.61 Impact Factor
