Michael Fitzharris

Publications (42) View all

• Article: Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: Data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study.

  Vanessa Beanland, Michael Fitzharris, Kristie L Young, Michael G Lenné
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Driver inattention and driver distraction represent a major problem in road safety. Although both are believed to contribute to increased crash risk, there is currently limited reliable information on their role in crashes. The current study used in-depth data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study to investigate the role of driver distraction and inattention in serious casualty crashes. The sample included 856 crashes from 2000 to 2011, in which at least one party was admitted to hospital due to crash-related injuries. Crashes were coded using a taxonomy of driver inattention that delineates five inattention subtypes: restricted attention, misprioritised attention, neglected attention, cursory attention, and diverted attention (distraction). Approximately 45% of crashes could not be coded due to insufficient information while in an additional 15% the participant indicated the "other driver was at fault" without specifying whether inattention was involved. Of the 340 remaining cases, most showed evidence of driver inattention (57.6%) or possible inattention (5.9%). The most common subtypes of inattention were restricted attention, primarily due to intoxication and/or fatigue, and diverted attention or distraction. The most common types of distraction involved voluntary, non-driving related distractions originating within the vehicle, such as passenger interactions. The current study indicates that a majority of serious injury crashes involve driver inattention. Most forms of inattention and distraction observed are preventable. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using in-depth crash data to investigate driver inattention in casualty crashes.
  Accident; analysis and prevention 02/2013; 54C:99-107. · 1.65 Impact Factor
• Article: Evaluation of a compensation claims management intervention for improving recovery from traumatic injury.

  Alex Collie, Michael Fitzharris, Belinda Gabbe
  Injury 07/2012; 43(9):1335-6. · 1.98 Impact Factor
• Article: The association of social functioning, social relationships and the receipt of compensation with time to return to work following unintentional injuries to Victorian workers.

  Fiona J Clay, Michael Fitzharris, Emily Kerr, Roderick J McClure, Wendy L Watson
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Understanding individual factors associated with return to work (RTW) post-injury is an important goal of compensation systems research. The aim of the present study was to determine factors associated with time to return to work following acute unintentional injuries. A prospective cohort study was conducted in Victoria, Australia. The cohort comprised 133 persons who were employed at the time they were admitted to one of three study hospitals. Baseline health status data was obtained retrospectively at one-week post-injury and participants were further surveyed at 1, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks post-injury to measure recovery. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to examine the association between potential prognostic factors and time to RTW during the 12 month study. At the end of 12 months follow-up, 81.2% of the study cohort had returned to work. Older age, increased injury severity, self reported symptomatic pain and poor mental health at 1 week post-injury were associated with extended time to RTW. A significant statistical interaction between the receipt of compensation and high social functioning as measured by the SF-36 or strong social relationships as measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life was associated with earlier RTW. Participants reporting strong social relationships and high social functioning at 1 week post-injury and entitled to injury compensation returned to work 2.05 and 3.66 times earlier respectively, than similar participants with no entitlement to compensation. Both injury-related and psychosocial factors were associated with the duration of time to RTW following acute unintentional injuries. This study replicated previously reported findings on social functioning and compensation from an independent acute trauma sample. Programs or policies to improve social functioning early post-injury may provide opportunities to improve the duration of time to RTW following injury.
  Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 01/2012; 22(3):363-75. · 2.80 Impact Factor
• Article: The status of trauma registry systems in Chinese hospitals.

  Michael Fitzharris, Wang Zhong, John Myburgh, Yu Xuezhong, James Yu, Naomi Hammond, Simon R Finfer, Colman Taylor, Yangfeng Wu
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Injuries are a major source of mortality and morbidity in China with approximately 66 million citizens requiring emergency medical care. Trauma registries provide the basis for quality assurance processes and inform the treatment of the injured patient. Against the backdrop of the recently established Chinese National Injury Surveillance System, the feasibility of establishing a multicentre trauma registry in a limited number of hospitals was examined. Seven hospital directors reported on a range of hospital characteristics including patient volume information and the types of patient information routinely collected. The findings indicate significant numbers of patients presenting due to injury, though little comparability in the type of information collected both between hospitals and with international trauma registry systems. The development of multicentre trauma registry is suggested as a way to monitor trauma system performance. The integration of clinical indicators into the National Injury Surveillance System in the long term is also recommended.
  Injury Prevention 12/2011; 17(6):419-21. · 1.39 Impact Factor
• Source

  Available from: Paul MacConachie Middleton

  Article: Adherence with the pre-hospital triage protocol in the transport of injured patients in an urban setting.

  Michael Fitzharris, Mark Stevenson, Paul Middleton, Garry Sinclair
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Pre-hospital triage protocols are an important component in the treatment of injured patients. The aim was to determine the level of, and factors associated with, adherence to the pre-hospital trauma triage criteria for urban patients transported in New South Wales, Australia. This retrospective study included patients injured in urban areas who were transported by road for the treatment of traumatic injuries in the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007. Of the 57,775 transported to hospital due to traumatic injury, 9344 (16%) met one or more of the pre-hospital triage criteria. Of these, 74% were transported to a protocol adherent major or regional trauma centre. Adherence rates differed by triage criteria met and was lowest for patients meeting physiologic-only criteria (63.5%) and highest for patients meeting all three triage criteria of physiology, mechanism and injury (85.4%). Female gender, increasing patient age, patients classified as having had a fall, the qualification level of treating officer and patients transported between midday to 18:00 (relative to those transported between midnight to 06:00) were factors associated with significantly lower levels of protocol adherence with respect to hospital destination. Minimal time differences were evident between patients transported to protocol adherent and non-adherent destinations. Based on the post hoc evaluation of triage status, adherence to the triage protocol was 74%. Analysis of patient destinations for protocol non-adherence appears to indicate that paramedic interpretation and discretion played a role in determining hospital choice. There was a marginal time difference between those transported to protocol adherent and non-adherent destinations. Future research needs to determine whether deviations from protocol are associated with differential mortality.
  Injury 11/2011; 43(9):1368-76. · 1.98 Impact Factor