Massimo Brescia |
|
Astronomer Researcher
|
|
National Institute of Astrophysics
·
Astronomical Observatory of Capodimonte
|
| a |
| a |
| a |
| a |
15.53
Research experience
-
-
Jan 2010–
Dec 2012Research: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II · Department of Computer and Systems EngineeringPortici · Italy -
Jan 2007
Research: Università degli Studi di Salerno
Università degli Studi di SalernoFisciano · Italy -
Jan 1997–
Dec 1998Research: Astronomical Observatory of Trieste
Astronomical Observatory of TriesteTrieste · Italy
-
-
Teaching: 2002 - 2007): Contract Professor of Computer Architecture
-
Teaching: Italy
-
Teaching: University Federico II of Naples
-
Teaching: M. Sc. in Astrophysics and Space Sciences
-
Teaching: M. Sc. in Informatics
-
Teaching: Italy
-
Teaching: University Federico II of Naples
-
Teaching: Department of Computer Science
-
Feb 2013–
presentTeaching: since 2008: Adjunct Professor of Technologies in Astronomy
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II · Department of Physical Sciences · AstroInformaticsItaly · Napoli -
Nov 2011
Research: EUCLID ESA Space Mission
European Space Agency · INAF OACN · European Space Agencyresponsible of Data Quality Science Team; member of Transient Science Working Group; -
Jan 2007
Research: DAME - Data Mining & Exploration
INAF, University Federico II, Caltech · Physics · INAF, University Federico II, CaltechDAME · Naplesdata mining, machine learning, distributed computing, web application, parallel programming -
Jan 2006–
Feb 2008Research: NEMO - NEutrino Mediterranean Observatory
INFN, University Federico II · Particle Physics · INFN, University Federico IIINFN Naples · Naplesneutrino detection, KM3net, off shore telescope, real-time trigger software -
Apr 2000–
Dec 2008Research: VLT Survey Telescope
ESO, INAF · ESO, INAFINAF-OACVST, Telescope Control System, Control Software, Telescope integration -
Jan 1997–
Dec 1999Research: VIMOS - Visible Infrared Multi Object Spectrograph
ESO, INAF · OACN · ESO, INAFESO - INAF · Naplesastronomical instrumentation, spectrograph, VLT, device control software -
Nov 1994–
Dec 1998Research: TNG - Galileo National Telescope
INAF · OACN · INAFINAF · Canary IslandsControl System, DIMM, Seeing detection, wind forecasting, neural networks
Education
-
Oct 1988–
Jul 1994University of Salerno
Master of Science (Laurea Magistrale)Italy · Salerno
Other
-
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish (chilean)
-
Scientific MembershipsIAU (International Astronomical Union) member;
Italian Association of Artificial Intelligence (AIIA) member;
Italian Society of Neural Networks (SIREN) member; -
Journal RefereesThe Standard International Journals
-
Other InterestsProject Manager of DAME (Data Mining & Exploration) Program
http://dame.dsf.unina.it
Leader of the Data Quality Science Team for the Euclid space mission Science Ground Segment
Questions and Answers (8) View all
-
Answer added in MPI12 Machine learning on massive datasets. How and when to choose between MPI and GPGPU technology?By Massimo Brescia · National Institute of AstrophysicsMassimo Brescia · National Institute of AstrophysicsFrom my experience (not so deep) MPI seems better than GPU when the flow host-device has to be massively employed. For example a hybrid model like MLP... [more]From my experience (not so deep) MPI seems better than GPU when the flow host-device has to be massively employed. For example a hybrid model like MLP+GA on massive datasets requires an intensive use of host-device exchange and it affects dramatically the speedup. Moreover, the dynamic memory allocation functions provided by CUDA reveal worst performances than the same C functions (such as malloc against cudaMalloc), when the allocated size grows up to 1 MB per call. Probably in such cases MPI is the solution...Following
-
Answer added in MPI12 Machine learning on massive datasets. How and when to choose between MPI and GPGPU technology?By Massimo Brescia · National Institute of AstrophysicsMassimo Brescia · National Institute of AstrophysicsThanks a lot friends! I've seen a lot of very interesting comments. In the specific case, we have implemented two machine learning algs. One is a pur... [more]Thanks a lot friends! I've seen a lot of very interesting comments. In the specific case, we have implemented two machine learning algs. One is a pure GA with an trigonometric expansion as fitness and the threshold MSE as fitness evaluation (if you're interested please have a look to Cavuoti et al. 2012 "Genetic Algorithm Modeling with GPU Parallel Computing Technology", which I've loaded in my researchgate pub list (because it is in press)). The second was a MLP trained by a GA, replacing back propagation rule. In the first case the GPU version was built wrapping the serial version (originally written in C++), through Thrust library and extern call mechanism to bypass C++ limitations of CUDA. The speedup was incredible (200X). In the second case, we developed the GPU version from scratch, duplicating CUDA routines to be able to run on multi-thread CPU for comparison. One year before I've also written the C++ serial version of MLPGA. Initially the performances were surprising: Both new CPU multi-thread and GPU versions were faster than the older C++. But, incredibly, the CPU one was faster of GPU version!! That's the reason why I launched the discussion here...Following
-
Question asked in MPI12 Machine learning on massive datasets. How and when to choose between MPI and GPGPU technology?At the implementation stage of a machine learning model, is there rule of thumb to prefer MPI against GPGPU architecture as the architecture?At the implementation stage of a machine learning model, is there rule of thumb to prefer MPI against GPGPU architecture as the architecture?By Massimo Brescia · National Institute of AstrophysicsFollowing
Publications (49) View all
-
Article: Inside catalogs: a comparison of source extraction software
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The scope of this paper is to compare the catalog extraction performances obtained using the new combination of SExtractor with PSFEx, against the more traditional and diffuse application of DAOPHOT with ALLSTAR; therefore, the paper may provide a guide for the selection of the most suitable catalog extraction software. Both software packages were tested on two kinds of simulated images having, respectively, a uniform spatial distribution of sources and an overdensity in the center. In both cases, SExtractor is able to generate a deeper catalog than DAOPHOT. Moreover, the use of neural networks for object classification plus the novel SPREAD\_MODEL parameter push down to the limiting magnitude the possibility of star/galaxy separation. DAOPHOT and ALLSTAR provide an optimal solution for point-source photometry in stellar fields and very accurate and reliable PSF photometry, with robust star-galaxy separation. However, they are not useful for galaxy characterization, and do not generate catalogs that are very complete for faint sources. On the other hand, SExtractor, along with the new capability to derive PSF photometry, turns to be competitive and returns accurate photometry also for galaxies. We can assess that the new version of SExtractor, used in conjunction with PSFEx, represents a very powerful software package for source extraction with performances comparable to those of DAOPHOT. Finally, by comparing the results obtained in the case of a uniform and of an overdense spatial distribution of stars, we notice, for both software packages, a decline for the latter case in the quality of the results produced in terms of magnitudes and centroids.12/2012; -
Chapter: New Trends in E-Science: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases
M. Brescia[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Data mining, or Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD), while being the main methodology to extract the scientific information contained in Massive Data Sets (MDS), needs to tackle crucial problems since it has to orchestrate complex challenges posed by transparent access to different computing environments, scalability of algorithms, reusability of resources. To achieve a leap forward for the progress of e-science in the data avalanche era, the community needs to implement an infrastructure capable of performing data access, processing and mining in a distributed but integrated context. The increasing complexity of modern technologies carried out a huge production of data, whose related warehouse management and the need to optimize analysis and mining procedures lead to a change in concept on modern science. Classical data exploration, based on local user own data storage and limited computing infrastructures, is no more efficient in the case of MDS, worldwide spread over inhomogeneous data centres and requiring teraflop processing power. In this context modern experimental and observational science requires a good understanding of computer science, network infrastructures, Data Mining, etc. i.e. of all those techniques which fall into the domain of the so called e-science (recently assessed also by the Fourth Paradigm of Science). Such understanding is almost completely absent in the older generations of scientists and this reflects in the inadequacy of most academic and research programs. A paradigm shift is needed: statistical pattern recognition, object oriented programming, distributed computing, parallel programming need to become an essential part of scientific background. A possible practical solution is to provide the research community with easy-to understand, easy-to-use tools, based on the Web 2.0 technologies and Machine Learning methodology. Tools where almost all the complexity is hidden to the final user, but which are still flexible and able to produce efficient and reliable scientific results. All these considerations will be described in the detail in the chapter. Moreover, examples of modern applications offering to a wide variety of e-science communities a large spectrum of computational facilities to exploit the wealth of available massive data sets and powerful machine learning and statistical algorithms will be also introduced07/2012: pages 74; , ISBN: 978-1-61942-774-7 -
SourceAvailable from: Massimo Brescia
Article: The DAME/VO-Neural Infrastructure: an Integrated Data Mining System Support for the Science Community
M. Brescia, A. Corazza, S. Cavuoti, G. d'Angelo, R. D'Abrusco, C. Donalek, S. G. Djorgovski, N. Deniskina, M. Fiore, M. Garofalo, O. Laurino, G. Longo A. Mahabal, F. Manna, A. Nocella, B. Skordovski[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Astronomical data are gathered through a very large number of heterogeneous techniques and stored in very diversified and often incompatible data repositories. Moreover in the e-science environment, it is needed to integrate services across distributed, heterogeneous, dynamic "virtual organizations" formed by different resources within a single enterprise and/or external resource sharing and service provider relationships. The DAME/VONeural project, run jointly by the University Federico II, INAF (National Institute of Astrophysics) Astronomical Observatories of Napoli and the California Institute of Technology, aims at creating a single, sustainable, distributed e-infrastructure for data mining and exploration in massive data sets, to be offered to the astronomical (but not only) community as a web application. The framework makes use of distributed computing environments (e.g. S.Co.P.E.) and matches the international IVOA standards and requirements. The integration process is technically challenging due to the need of achieving a specific quality of service when running on top of different native platforms. In these terms, the result of the DAME/VO-Neural project effort will be a service-oriented architecture, obtained by using appropriate standards and incorporating Grid paradigms and restful Web services frameworks where needed, that will have as main target the integration of interdisciplinary distributed systems within and across organizational domains.12/2011; -
SourceAvailable from: Massimo Brescia
Article: The detection of globular clusters in galaxies as a data mining problem
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We present an application of self-adaptive supervised learning classifiers derived from the Machine Learning paradigm, to the identification of candidate Globular Clusters in deep, wide-field, single band HST images. Several methods provided by the DAME (Data Mining & Exploration) web application, were tested and compared on the NGC1399 HST data described in Paolillo 2011. The best results were obtained using a Multi Layer Perceptron with Quasi Newton learning rule which achieved a classification accuracy of 98.3%, with a completeness of 97.8% and 1.6% of contamination. An extensive set of experiments revealed that the use of accurate structural parameters (effective radius, central surface brightness) does improve the final result, but only by 5%. It is also shown that the method is capable to retrieve also extreme sources (for instance, very extended objects) which are missed by more traditional approaches.10/2011; -
Article: Recent achievements of the NEMO project
E. Migneco, S. Aiello, A. Aloisio, F. Ameli, I. Amore, M. Anghinolfi, A. Anzalone, G. Barbarino, E. Barbarito, M. Battaglieri, [......], F. Speziale, M. Spurio, M. Taiuti, G. Terreni, L. Trasatti, S. Urso, V. Valente, M. Vecchi, P. Vicini, R. Wischnewski[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The status of the activities towards the realization of a km3 Cherenkov neutrino detector carried out by the NEMO Collaboration is described. The realization of a Phase-1 project, which is under way, will validate the proposed technologies for the realization of the km3 detector on a Test Site at 2000 m depth. The realization of a new infrastructure on the candidate site (Phase-2 project) will provide the possibility to test detector components at 3500 m depth.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment 01/2008; · 1.21 Impact Factor
About
DAME (Data Mining & Exploration) Project Manager
The project is open to Collaborations.
More info at http://dame.dsf.unina.it