Skills (24)
-
25 Questions52 Followers
-
880 Questions47696 Followers
-
15 Questions64 Followers
-
16 Questions64 Followers
-
530 Questions26039 Followers
-
0 Questions0 Followers
-
0 Questions5 Followers
-
0 Questions1 Follower
-
0 Questions0 Followers
-
0 Questions0 Followers
-
383 Questions27259 Followers
Research experience
-
Oct 2011
Research: Research assistant
The University of Manchester · Faculty of Medical and Human SciencesUnited Kingdom · ManchesterGenetics -
Aug 2005–
Aug 2011Research: Research associate
The University of Manchester · Faculty of Life Sciences · Molecular biologyManchesterDNA-protein interactions, plasmid segregation, synthetich biology -
Jan 2002–
Dec 2006Research: Università Politecnica delle Marche
Università Politecnica delle MarcheItaly · Ancona -
Nov 2001–
Oct 2004Research: PhD
Universita' Politecnica delle Marche · Istituto di Microbiologia · Molecular biologyAnconaVibrio cholerae, bacterial adhesion
Education
-
Nov 2001–
Oct 2004Universita' Politecnica delle Marche
Microbiology · PhDItaly · Ancona -
Mar 1994–
Jul 2000Universita' Politecnica delle Marche
Biology · MScItaly · Ancona
Other
-
LanguagesLanguages
Italian - native speaker
English - good knoledge (spoken and written)
Greek elementary
Questions and Answers (25) View all
-
Answer added in Plant Pathology12 I look for a software to draw a circular viral genome, indicating the beginning and end of ORFs.By Marcos Fernando Basso · Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Massimiliano Zampini · The University of ManchesterHi Marcos, Invitrogen VectorNTI is also a standard in the market withth plenty of functions (but APE is a freeware as said before so a good software ... [more]Hi Marcos, Invitrogen VectorNTI is also a standard in the market withth plenty of functions (but APE is a freeware as said before so a good software to start with eventually). Max.Following
-
Answer added in Plant Pathology12 I look for a software to draw a circular viral genome, indicating the beginning and end of ORFs.By Marcos Fernando Basso · Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Massimiliano Zampini · The University of ManchesterHi, You could use APE (A Plasmid Editor). It is a simple, free and superpowerful software for its simplicity (not even need to install it. It can ... [more]Hi, You could use APE (A Plasmid Editor). It is a simple, free and superpowerful software for its simplicity (not even need to install it. It can also read .gb files (GenBank files from NCBI) showing annotated features. You find it here (http://biologylabs.utah.edu/jorgensen/wayned/ape/). Max.Following
-
Answer added in Gene Regulation5 Is there any evidence showing a role for bases flanking a binding sequence in interaction of a binding factor with its "non-DNA-binding" co-factor?By Nima Mohaghegh · Boston UniversityMassimiliano Zampini · The University of ManchesterHi Nima, I made a mistake in the PMID actually (the correct one is this: PMID:19376860). Anyway there are many other papers on the subject which are... [more]Hi Nima, I made a mistake in the PMID actually (the correct one is this: PMID:19376860). Anyway there are many other papers on the subject which are very good like those cited in the paper from Zang et al. 2004. Thanks again and regards, Max.Following
-
Answer added in Gene Regulation5 Is there any evidence showing a role for bases flanking a binding sequence in interaction of a binding factor with its "non-DNA-binding" co-factor?By Nima Mohaghegh · Boston UniversityMassimiliano Zampini · The University of ManchesterHi Nima thanks for your comments (if you think you are welcome vote up the answer but it is not fundamental actually. I am happy if I can help and whe... [more]Hi Nima thanks for your comments (if you think you are welcome vote up the answer but it is not fundamental actually. I am happy if I can help and when I find the answer to my doubts). I have struggled a lot in the past to understand this process (in our case the flanking regions were dictating the affinity of binding and in a similar way to E2 the only requirement for the spacer was to be AT-rich - the paper PubMed ID is PMID: 22492712 eventually). Max.Following
-
Answer added in Gene Regulation5 Is there any evidence showing a role for bases flanking a binding sequence in interaction of a binding factor with its "non-DNA-binding" co-factor?By Nima Mohaghegh · Boston UniversityMassimiliano Zampini · The University of ManchesterIf I understood your question correctly you are describing a process defined as "indirect readout" (or less frequently shape readout. Here is a good s... [more]If I understood your question correctly you are describing a process defined as "indirect readout" (or less frequently shape readout. Here is a good starting review on the topic: Rohs et al. 2010. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA ecognition. Annu Rev Biochem.). Indirect readout is the recognition of a DNA sequence through the conformational properties of the binding site (any conformation different from the B-DNA may be recognized by its peculiar local 3D structure or by its structural properties (i.e flexibility). Sequences of the dsDNA not involved in specific interactions (i.e. bonds with the DNA bases) or non-specific interactions (i.e bonds with the phosphate ackbone of the dsDNA) may in fact play a crucial role in DNA recognition by a given protein. A very good example in literature is that of E2 protein from Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) (Zang et al. 2004. Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions) E2 is a homodimer where each monomer inserts an alpha-helix in the major groove of an "ACCG" sequence (direct readout), holding the DNA in an arc and leaving the spacer AATT uncontacted by the E2 protein. This spacer is responsable for the indirect readout effect since it is not bound by E2 but its flexibility (AT-rich) allows for the DNA to be bent "around" E2.(AT-rich) allows for the DNA to be bent "around" E2.Since E2 induces a strong bend in the binding site upon binding to it, the higher the bendability of this region the higher the affinity and the strenght of the interaction. Indirect readout is so important that some authors suggest also that the binding site for a site-specific DNA-binding protein should always be given together with the flanking regions when these are responsable for indirect readout effects (Linda Jen-Jacobson. 1997 Protein—DNA recognition complexes: Conservation of structure and binding energy in the transition state. Biopolymers)("...Our work on EcoRI endonuclease indicates that the three flanking base pairs on either side of the recognition site may alter the specific binding constant by as much as 500-fold" - see also Fig. 9 of this paper). In your case the effect of the indirect readout would be further related to the binding of the cofactor. Expecially in Eukariotes transcription factors bind in combinations (some do not even contact the DNA - these are defined protein cofactors - but partecipate in the final assembly) (Moretti and Ansari. 2008. Expanding the specificity of DNA targeting by harnessing cooperative assembly. Biochimie). Finally remember the process of the "induced fit" where the conformation of a given DNA-binding protein bound to the cognate binding site could be different from that in the unbound state. Indirect readout effects allowing the transcription factor to bind by induced fit may allow stronger binding of the cofactor through allosteric mechanism (the conformation of the transcription factor is not rigid and upon binding to the DNA it may slighly change to be bound better by the cofactor eventually)(Jeffrey et al. 1998. Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators Nature)(..."Hence DNA acts as an allosteric ligand whose binding alters the regulator's affinity for other ligands, such as coactivators or corepressors. If the regulator assumes distinct conformations on binding to different genomic sites, then the DNA sequence of the response element can specify which surfaces are available to contact target factors, and thereby determine how the protein regulates transcription at that site (Fig. 1a, b). This mechanism is versatile and adaptable; for example, transcriptional regulators could be 'tethered' through protein–protein contacts with DNA-bound factors, without themselves contacting DNA. In such cases, the bound protein would serve as the allosteric effector). I hope this may help. Massimiliano.Following
Publications (13) View all
-
Article: Structural mechanism of ATP-induced polymerization of the partition factor ParF: implications for DNA segregation.
Maria A Schumacher, Qiaozhen Ye, Madhuri T Barge, Massimiliano Zampini, Daniela Barillà, Finbarr Hayes[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Segregation of the bacterial multidrug resistance plasmid TP228 requires the centromere-binding protein ParG, the parH centromere, and the Walker box ATPase ParF. The cycling of ParF between ADP- and ATP-bound states drives TP228 partition; ATP binding stimulates ParF polymerization, which is essential for segregation, whereas ADP binding antagonizes polymerization and inhibits DNA partition. The molecular mechanism involved in this adenine nucleotide switch is unclear. Moreover, it is unknown how any Walker box protein polymerizes in an ATP-dependent manner. Here, we describe multiple ParF structures in ADP- and phosphomethylphosphonic acid adenylate ester (AMPPCP)-bound states. ParF-ADP is monomeric but dimerizes when complexed with AMPPCP. Strikingly, in ParF-AMPPCP structures, the dimers interact to create dimer-of-dimer "units" that generate a specific linear filament. Mutation of interface residues prevents both polymerization and DNA segregation in vivo. Thus, these data provide insight into a unique mechanism by which a Walker box protein forms polymers that involves the generation of ATP-induced dimer-of-dimer building blocks.Journal of Biological Chemistry 06/2012; 287(31):26146-54. · 4.77 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central
Article: Combinatorial targeting of ribbon-helix-helix artificial transcription factors to chimeric recognition sites.
Massimiliano Zampini, Finbarr Hayes[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Artificial transcription factors (ATFs) are potent synthetic biology tools for modulating endogenous gene expression and precision genome editing. The ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) superfamily of transcription factors are widespread in bacteria and archaea. The principal DNA binding determinant in this family comprises a two-stranded antiparallel β-sheet (ribbons) in which a pair of eight-residue motifs insert into the major groove. Here, we demonstrate that ribbons of divergent RHH proteins are compact and portable elements that can be grafted into a common α-helical scaffold producing active ATFs. Hybrid proteins cooperatively recognize DNA sites possessing core tetramer boxes whose functional spacing is dictated by interactions between the α-helical backbones. These interactions also promote combinatorial binding of chimeras with different transplanted ribbons, but identical backbones, to synthetic sites bearing cognate boxes for each protein either in vitro or in vivo. The composite assembly of interacting hybrid proteins offers potential advantages associated with combinatorial approaches to DNA recognition compared with ATFs that involve binding of a single protein. Moreover, the new class of RHH ATFs may be utilized to re-engineer transcriptional circuits, or may be enhanced with affinity tags, fluorescent moieties or other elements for targeted genome marking and manipulation in bacteria and archaea.Nucleic Acids Research 04/2012; 40(14):6673-82. · 8.03 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central
Article: Segrosome assembly at the pliable parH centromere.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The segrosome of multiresistance plasmid TP228 comprises ParF, which is a member of the ParA ATPase superfamily, and the ParG ribbon-helix-helix factor that assemble jointly on the parH centromere. Here we demonstrate that the distinctive parH site (∼100-bp) consists of an array of degenerate tetramer boxes interspersed by AT-rich spacers. Although numerous consecutive AT-steps are suggestive of inherent curvature, parH lacks an intrinsic bend. Sequential deletion of parH tetramers progressively reduced centromere function. Nevertheless, the variant subsites could be rearranged in different geometries that accommodated centromere activity effectively revealing that the site is highly elastic in vivo. ParG cooperatively coated parH: proper centromere binding necessitated the protein's N-terminal flexible tails which modulate the centromere binding affinity of ParG. Interaction of the ParG ribbon-helix-helix domain with major groove bases in the tetramer boxes likely provides direct readout of the centromere. In contrast, the AT-rich spacers may be implicated in indirect readout that mediates cooperativity between ParG dimers assembled on adjacent boxes. ParF alone does not bind parH but instead loads into the segrosome interactively with ParG, thereby subtly altering centromere conformation. Assembly of ParF into the complex requires the N-terminal flexible tails in ParG that are contacted by ParF.Nucleic Acids Research 03/2011; 39(12):5082-97. · 8.03 Impact Factor -
Article: Recruitment of the ParG segregation protein to different affinity DNA sites.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The segrosome is the nucleoprotein complex that mediates accurate plasmid segregation. In addition to its multifunctional role in segrosome assembly, the ParG protein of multiresistance plasmid TP228 is a transcriptional repressor of the parFG partition genes. ParG is a homodimeric DNA binding protein, with C-terminal regions that interlock into a ribbon-helix-helix fold. Antiparallel beta-strands in this fold are presumed to insert into the O(F) operator major groove to exert transcriptional control as established for other ribbon-helix-helix factors. The O(F) locus comprises eight degenerate tetramer boxes arranged in a combination of direct and inverted orientation. Each tetramer motif likely recruits one ParG dimer, implying that the fully bound operator is cooperatively coated by up to eight dimers. O(F) was subdivided experimentally into four overlapping 20-bp sites (A to D), each of which comprises two tetramer boxes separated by AT-rich spacers. Extensive interaction studies demonstrated that sites A to D individually are bound with different affinities by ParG (C > A approximately B > D). Moreover, comprehensive scanning mutagenesis revealed the contribution of each position in the site core and flanking sequences to ParG binding. Natural variations in the tetramer box motifs and in the interbox spacers, as well as in flanking sequences, each influence ParG binding. The O(F) operator apparently has evolved with sites that bind ParG dissimilarly to produce a nucleoprotein complex fine-tuned for optimal interaction with the transcription machinery. The association of other ribbon-helix-helix proteins with complex recognition sites similarly may be modulated by natural sequence variations between subsites.Journal of bacteriology 04/2009; 191(12):3832-41. · 3.94 Impact Factor -
Article: Vibrios in association with sedimentary crustaceans in three beaches of the northern Adriatic Sea (Italy).
A Covazzi Harriague, Marco Di Brino, Massimiliano Zampini, Giancarlo Albertelli, Carla Pruzzo, Cristina Misic[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In the marine environment, vibrios adhere to a number of substrates including chitin-rich organisms such as crustaceans. Their wide diffusion in coastal waters and pathogenic potential require knowledge of the lifestyle and environmental reservoirs of these bacteria. To test the presence of culturable vibrios in coastal areas and their association with benthic crustaceans, vibrios were isolated from water, sediments and crustaceans (copepods and anphipods) at three stations placed in front of heavily used tourist beaches of the Adriatic Sea. We observed significant correlations between vibrios and temperature. Benthic and planktonic copepods harboured vibrios in summer, while benthic amphipods harboured these bacteria in spring and autumn. Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains gave positive results using primers for Vibrio cholerae toxR and toxS. Sedimentary crustaceans may extend Vibrio persistence in seawater and may represent an additional aquatic reservoir of these bacteria.Marine Pollution Bulletin 04/2008; 56(3):574-9. · 2.50 Impact Factor