Maria J Silva |
|
|
|
National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge
·
Department of Human Genetics
|
| a |
| a |
| a |
| a |
12.04
Publications (7) View all
-
Article: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 deficiency does not affect ethylnitrosourea mutagenicity in liver and testis of lacZ transgenic mice.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (Parp1) has been implicated in DNA base excision repair, single- and double-strand break repair pathways, as well as in cell death by apoptosis or necrosis. We used Parp1(-/-) lacZ plasmid-based transgenic mice to investigate whether Parp1 deficiency influences the in vivo mutagenic and clastogenic response to the alkylating agent N-ethyl-N-Nitrosourea (ENU) in somatic and germ-cell tissues. The comparison of the lacZ mutant frequencies (MFs) between Parp1(+/+) and Parp1(-/-) mice showed that the ablation of Parp1 does not affect the spontaneous or ENU-induced MFs in liver and testis. In addition, the spectrum of the ENU-induced mutations was not dependent on the Parp1 status, given that similar spectra, consisting mostly of point mutations and a small fraction of deletions/insertions, wereobserved in organs of both Parp1(-/-) and Parp1(+/+) mice. Sequencing of point mutations revealed a consistent significant increase in A:T --> T:A base substitutions, typically induced by ENU. Overall, we observed that neither the frequency nor the spectrum of ENU-induced mutations demonstrated a specificity that could be attributed to the Parp1 impairment in mice organs. The analysis of micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood reticulocytes showed that ENU was clastogenic in both Parp1(-/-) and Parp1(+/+) mice and had a strong cytotoxic effect in Parp1(-/-) mice only. The present data suggest that, at a whole-organism level, Parp1-independent repair mechanisms may be operative in the removal of ENU-induced DNA lesions or that highly damaged cells may be preferentially committed to death when Parp1 is inactivated.Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 03/2010; 51(4):322-9. · 3.71 Impact Factor -
Article: Mutagenic effects of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 deficiency in transgenic mice.
Henriqueta Louro, Inês Pinheiro, Paula Costa, Carla Sousa, Anabela Dias, Maria G Boavida, Maria J Silva[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (Parp1) plays a central role in the maintenance of genomic integrity and has been unequivocally associated to DNA base excision repair (BER) but its involvement in double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways remains unclear. In this work, using transgenic Parp1-deficient mice harbouring the lacZ reporter gene, we provide in vivo evidence that Parp1 contributes to the prevention of deletions/insertions in testis following an alkylation insult. In response to N-Methyl-N-Nitrosurea (MNU) treatment no significant difference in the mutant frequency (MF) in the liver and testis could be attributed to Parp1 status, given that both Parp1(+/+) and Parp1(-/-) mice showed a similar significant increase in the overall MF. However, restriction analysis of MNU-induced mutants evidenced a shift in the distribution of mutations between deletions/insertions and point mutations in testis, but not in the liver, dependent on the Parp1 status. A significant higher frequency of deletions/insertions was observed in testis from Parp1(-/-) in comparison to Parp1(+/+) mice, whereas point mutations were not significantly affected. Overall, our findings show that Parp1 participates in the prevention of deletions/insertions induced by methylating agents and that organ-specific factors may influence its capacity to protect against genotoxic damage.Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 05/2008; 640(1-2):82-8. · 2.85 Impact Factor -
Article: Comparative analysis of the mutagenic activity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the Hprt gene of CHO cells.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Oxaliplatin is a platinum-derived antitumor drug that is active against cisplatin-resistant tumors and has lower overall toxicity than does cisplatin. DNA adduct formation is believed to mediate the cytotoxic activity of both compounds; however, the adducts may also be responsible for mutagenic and secondary tumorigenic activities. In this study, we have compared the mutagenicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the Hprt gene of CHO-K1 cells. Both drugs produced dose-related increases in mutant frequency. For 1-hr treatments, oxaliplatin was less mutagenic than cisplatin at equimolar doses, while similar mutant frequencies were induced at equitoxic doses. Sequencing of mutant Hprt genes indicated that the mutation spectra of both oxaliplatin and cisplatin were significantly different from the spontaneous mutation spectrum (P = 0.014 and P = 0.008, respectively). A significant difference was also observed between the spectra of oxaliplatin- and cisplatin-induced mutations (P = 0.033). Although G:C-->T:A transversion was the most common mutation produced by both compounds, oxaliplatin produced higher frequencies of A:T-->T:A transversion than did cisplatin, most commonly at nucleotide 307, and higher frequencies of small deletions/insertions. Also, cisplatin induced tandem base-pair substitutions, mainly at positions 135/136, and a higher frequency of G:C-->A:T transition than did oxaliplatin. These results provide the first evidence that oxaliplatin is mutagenic and that the profiles of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-induced mutations display not only similarities but also distinctive features relating to the type and sequence-context preference for mutation. Environ.Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 09/2005; 46(2):104-15. · 3.71 Impact Factor -
Article: Intra- and inter-laboratory variation in the scoring of micronuclei and nucleoplasmic bridges in binucleated human lymphocytes. Results of an international slide-scoring exercise by the HUMN project.
Michael Fenech, Stefano Bonassi, Julie Turner, Cecilia Lando, Marcello Ceppi, Wushou Peter Chang, Nina Holland, Micheline Kirsch-Volders, Errol Zeiger, Maria Paola Bigatti, [......], Thier Orsiere, Maria Rosaria Scarfì, Maria J Silva, Toshio Sofuni, Jordi Surralles, Giorgio Trenta, Irena Vorobtsova, Anne Vral, Andrea Zijno, Jordi Suralles[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: One of the objectives of the HUman MicroNucleus (HUMN) project is to identify the methodological variables that have an important impact on micronucleus (MN) or micronucleated (MNed) cell frequencies measured in human lymphocytes using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. In a previous study we had shown that the scoring criteria used were likely to be an important variable. To determine the extent of residual variation when laboratories scored cells from the same cultures using the same set of standard scoring criteria, an inter-laboratory slide-scoring exercise was performed among 34 laboratories from 21 countries with a total of 51 slide scorers involved. The results of this study show that even under these optimized conditions there is a great variation in the MN frequency or MNed cell frequency obtained by individual laboratories and scorers. All laboratories ranked correctly the MNed cell frequency in cells from cultures that were unirradiated, or exposed to 1 or 2Gy of gamma rays. The study also estimated that the intra-scorer median coefficient of variation for duplicate MNed cell frequency scores is 29% for unexposed cultures and 14 and 11% for cells exposed to 1 and 2Gy, respectively. These values can be used as a standard for quality or acceptability of data in future studies. Using a Poisson regression model it was estimated that radiation dose explained 67% of the variance, while staining method, cell sample, laboratory, and covariance explained 0.6, 0.3, 6.5, and 25.6% of the variance, respectively, leaving only 3.1% of the variance unexplained. As part of this exercise, nucleoplasmic bridges were also estimated by the laboratories; however, inexperience in the use of this biomarker of chromosome rearrangement was reflected in the much greater heterogeneity in the data and the unexplained variation estimated by the Poisson model. The results of these studies indicate clearly that even after standardizing culture and scoring conditions it will be necessary to calibrate scorers and laboratories if MN, MNed cell and nucleoplasmic bridge frequencies are to be reliably compared among laboratories and among populations.Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 02/2003; 534(1-2):45-64. · 2.85 Impact Factor -
Article: Mutagenic activity of cisplatin in the lacZ plasmid-based transgenic mouse model.
Henriqueta Louro, Maria J Silva, Maria G Boavida[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cisplatin) is a well characterized antitumor drug used for the treatment of a variety of human cancers. The cytotoxicity of cisplatin is mainly mediated through the formation of DNA adducts, which are also believed to be responsible for the secondary malignancies produced by the drug. The aim of this study was to determine the in vivo mutagenic activity of cisplatin in the lacZ plasmid-based transgenic mouse model. The mutant frequency (MF) and the spectrum of mutations induced by cisplatin in the mouse liver were analyzed and compared to controls. The mean MF in the lacZ gene was increased 2-fold in mice treated with a single 6 mg/kg body weight dose of cisplatin and sacrificed after 17 and 28 days (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001). Restriction analysis and sequencing of mutant DNA showed that cisplatin was able to induce both large deletions and point mutations. A specific profile of base substitution and frameshift mutations was identified in treated mice, consisting primarily of G:C-->A:T transitions at GpG and ApG sites, the preferential DNA binding sites of cisplatin, and single basepair deletions/insertions. The present results provide the first evidence that cisplatin has mutagenic activity in vivo and induces a characteristic pattern of mutations in the mouse liver. This mutagenicity may be responsible for its tumorigenic activity.Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 02/2002; 40(4):283-91. · 3.71 Impact Factor