Loic Campion

MD
Unicancer · Biostatistics
a
a
a
a
38.31

Topics (10) View all

Publications (90) View all

  • Article: [Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection for clinically localized prostate carcinoma: results obtained in the first 70 patients].
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in prostatic cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the relevance of the sentinel lymph node biopsy by laparoscopy in staging locoregional patients with clinically localized PC. A transrectal ultrasound-guided injection by 0.3 mL/100 MBq (99m)Tc-sulfur rhenium colloid in each prostatic lobe was performed the day before surgery. The detection was realized intraoperatively with a laparoscopic probe (Clerad(®) Gamma Sup) followed by extensive dissection. Counts of SLN were performed in vivo and confirmed ex vivo. The histological analysis was performed by hematoxyline-phloxine-safran staining and followed by immunochemistry if SLN is free. Seventy patients with carcinoma of the prostate at intermediate or high risk of lymph node metastases were included. The intraoperative detection rate was 68/70 (97%). Fourteen patients had lymph node metastases, six only in SLN. The false negative rate was 2/14 (14%). The internal iliac region was the first metastatic site (40.9%). A metastatic sentinel node in common iliac region beyond the ureteral junction was present in 18.2%. A non-negligible sentinel metastatic region was the common iliac area (18.2%). Limited or standard lymph node dissection would have ignored respectively 72.7% and 59% of lymph node metastases. The laparoscopy is adapted to a broad identification of SLN and targeted dissection of these lymph nodes significantly limited the risk of surgical extended dissection while maintaining the accuracy of the information.
    Progrès en Urologie 01/2012; 22(1):30-7. · 0.58 Impact Factor
  • Article: Prognostic factors for patients treated for a recurrent FIGO stage III ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of 108 cases.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine overall survival of patients treated for a first relapse of FIGO stage III ovarian cancer, outside of randomized trial, with a long term follow-up and to identify prognostic factors. A consecutive series of 108 patients treated for a first relapse of a FIGO stage III ovarian cancer was retrospectively included from December 1999 to November 2004. Each patient was treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in case of late (>6 months) relapse and with salvage chemotherapy without platinum in case of <6 months relapse. For statistical analysis the studied parameters were age, histological subtype, the completeness of initial surgery, disease-free period, localization of the relapse, clinical response to second-line chemotherapy, the completeness of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) when it was performed. Median follow-up from the first relapse was 40 months. From the 108 patients, 35 underwent SCS. Median overall survival from the first relapse was 13 months in case of no SCS or non-optimal SCS and 35 months for patient with an optimal SCS (p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis age, disease-free period, the clinical presentation of the relapse, completeness of SCS and response to second line chemotherapy appeared to be independent prognostic factors. Prognostic factors of ovarian cancer relapse are directly or indirectly linked with the feasibility of a complete SCS. Thus in the case of an ovarian cancer relapse, the feasibility of SCS must be considered in order to give the patient the best chance to experience its complete removal.
    European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 09/2011; 37(11):971-7. · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Article: Separation of NTO Related 1,2,4‐Triazole‐3‐One Derivatives by a high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis
    L. Le Campion, M. T. Adeline, J. Ouazzani
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report describes a direct, rapid and sensitive method for separating and quantifying 5-nitro-1,2,4-triazole-3-one 1 (NTO) and 5-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-one 2. Analyses were performed on water and on soil containing compounds 1 and/or 2, using reversed phase HPLC columns. A mixture of compounds 1, 2, Urazole 3 and 1,2,4-triazole-3-one 4 was well separated by HPLC on a Hypercarb column packed with porous graphitic carbon, or by capillary electrophoresis. Both methods could be used to detect such compounds in the environment and monitor their biological and chemical degradation.
    Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics 10/2004; 22(4):233 - 237. · 1.10 Impact Factor
  • Article: [Quality of life after lipomodelling: Retrospective study about 42 patients.]
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Study of the quality of life of 42 patients who underwent a lipofilling in our institution between 2009 and 2010. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Analysis of cosmetic outcomes, side effects, emotional life and preoperative information received by a cohort of 42 patients contacted by anonymous questionnaires. Comparisons between patients with a single prothesis, latissimus dorsi flap with prothesis, autologous latissimus dorsi flap and rectus abdominal flap. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (42 patients). The average volume of fat injected was 80mL. The aspect of the reconstructed breast and the harmony between two breasts were better after lipofilling (P=0.0001, P=0.0005). The evolution of the aesthetic result is satisfying for 64.1% of the patients. In 29% of cases, patients noticed adhesions at the injection site. Apprehension to touch the reconstructed breast and to wear a swimsuit decreases after lipofilling (P=0.0345;P=0.0284). All patients declared to be satisfied with the presurgery information. Half of the patients declare that the final result corresponds to their wishes. DISCUSSION: The side effects of lipofilling were studied from an oncological point of view. Less publications describe the patients quality of life after lipofilling. This surgery improves the breast reconstruction results and helps patients in a social, affective and aesthetic way. Overall, lipofilling improves more consistency in patients reconstructed by single prothesis and improves more appearance in patients reconstructed by single flap. CONCLUSION: Lipofilling improves significantly patients' quality of life. A clinical research protocol (GRATSEC) is currently underway to extend its indications. The lipofilling should not replace a bad indication of breast reconstruction.
    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 03/2013; · 0.33 Impact Factor
  • Article: Cytogenetic and therapeutic characterization of primary plasma cell leukemia: the IFM experience
    Leukemia 07/2011; 26(1):158-159. · 9.56 Impact Factor

Following (37) See all

Followers (44) See all