Lawrence S Young |
|
PhD DSc FRCPath FRCP FMedSci
|
Research experience
-
Jan 2009
Research: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUSA · Chapel Hill -
Jan 2007
Research: Cambridge College
Cambridge CollegeUSA · Cambridge -
Jan 2006
Research: The Chinese University of Hong Kong
The Chinese University of Hong Kong · Department of Clinical OncologyHong Kong · Hong Kong -
Jan 2003
Research: University of Oxford
University of OxfordUnited Kingdom · Oxford -
Jan 2001–
Dec 2003Research: The University of Manchester
The University of ManchesterUnited Kingdom · Manchester -
Jan 2000–
Dec 2003Research: University of Wolverhampton
University of WolverhamptonUnited Kingdom · Wolverhampton -
Jan 2000
Research: Palacký University of Olomouc
Palacký University of OlomoucCzech Republic · Olomouc -
Jan 2000–
Dec 2001Research: Keele University
Keele UniversityUnited Kingdom · Newcastle under Lyme -
Jan 1998
Research: The University Hospital of Wales
The University Hospital of Wales · Department of MedicineUnited Kingdom · Cardiff -
Jan 1996–
Dec 2003Research: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
Queen Elizabeth Hospital BirminghamUnited Kingdom · Birmingham -
Jan 1992–
Dec 2005Research: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS · Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer StudiesUnited Kingdom · Birmingham -
Jan 1991
Research: Aarhus Universitetshospital
Aarhus UniversitetshospitalDenmark · Århus -
Jan 1991–
Dec 1992Research: Freie Universität Berlin
Freie Universität Berlin · Institute of Social and Cultural AnthropologyGermany · Berlin -
Jan 1987–
Dec 2012Research: University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham · School of Cancer SciencesUnited Kingdom · Birmingham
Questions and Answers (1) View all
-
Answer added in Cancer Biology14 Can anyone tell me if there are commercially available lymphoma cell lines of which there is an Epstein-Barr Virus-positive and -negative variant?By Julie Morscio · KU LeuvenLawrence Young · The University of WarwickSome of the commercially available cell lines are not well-characterised and of dubious provenance. We can provide matched EBV-positive and negative ... [more]Some of the commercially available cell lines are not well-characterised and of dubious provenance. We can provide matched EBV-positive and negative BL cell lines if you are interested.Following
Publications (275) View all
-
Article: Inhibition of the LKB1-AMPK Pathway by the Epstein-Barr Virus-encoded LMP1 Promotes Proliferation and Transformation of Human Nasopharyngeal Epithelial Cells.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The association of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection with the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is well established. Latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), the major oncogene encoded by EBV, is believed to play a crucial role in NPC pathogenesis by virtue of its ability to constitutively activate multiple cell signalling pathways. The LKB1-AMPK pathway is a master regulator of cellular metabolism that, via modulation of energy metabolism, has tumour suppressor activity. In this study we identify a novel ability of LMP1 to inhibit the LKB1-AMPK pathway through phosphorylation of LKB1 at serine 428 with subsequent suppression of the phosphorylation of AMPK and its substrates, ACC and Raptor. We show that MEK/ERK-MAPK signalling, activated by the CTAR1 domain of LMP1, is responsible for LKB1-AMPK inactivation. In addition, reactivation of AMPK signalling by AMPK activator, AICAR, abolished LMP1-induced cellular transformation (proliferation and anchorage-independent growth) in nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that low level of phosphorylated AMPK is common in primary NPC specimens, and that this correlated significantly with the expression of LMP1. AICAR treatment inhibited the proliferation and anchorage independent growth of NPC cells as well as potentiating the cytotoxic effect of the chemotherapeutic drug, 5-fluorouracil. The current findings demonstrate that LMP1-mediated AMPK inactivation contributes to the proliferation and transformation of epithelial cells thereby implicating the LKB1-AMPK pathway in the EBV-driven pathogenesis of NPC. Our findings also suggest that AMPK activators could be used to enhance the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of local and metastatic NPC.The Journal of Pathology 04/2013; · 6.32 Impact Factor -
Article: The role of the EBV-encoded latent membrane proteins LMP1 and LMP2 in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Christopher W Dawson, Rebecca J Port, Lawrence S Young[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although frequently expressed in EBV-positive malignancies, the contribution of the oncogenic latent membrane proteins, LMP1 and LMP2, to the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is not fully defined. As a key effector in EBV-driven B cell transformation and an established "transforming" gene, LMP1 displays oncogenic properties in rodent fibroblasts and induces profound morphological and phenotypic effects in epithelial cells. LMP1 functions as a viral mimic of the TNFR family member, CD40, engaging a number of signalling pathways that induce morphological and phenotypic alterations in epithelial cells. Although LMP2A plays an essential role in maintaining viral latency in EBV infected B cells, its role in epithelial cells is less clear. Unlike LMP1, LMP2A does not display "classical" transforming functions in rodent fibroblasts but its ability to engage a number of potentially oncogenic cell signalling pathways suggests that LMP2A can also participate in EBV-induced epithelial cell growth transformation. Here we review the effects of LMP1 and LMP2 on various aspects of epithelial cell behaviour highlighting key aspects that may contribute to the pathogenesis of NPC.Seminars in Cancer Biology 04/2012; 22(2):144-53. · 6.47 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Lawrence S Young
Article: A global view of the oncogenic landscape in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an integrated analysis at the genetic and expression levels.
Chunfang Hu, Wenbin Wei, Xiaoyi Chen, Ciaran B Woodman, Yunhong Yao, John M Nicholls, Irène Joab, Sim K Sihota, Jian-Yong Shao, K Dalia Derkaoui, Aicha Amari, Stephanie L Maloney, Andrew I Bell, Paul G Murray, Christopher W Dawson, Lawrence S Young, John R Arrand[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Previous studies have reported that the tumour cells of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) exhibit recurrent chromosome abnormalities. These genetic changes are broadly assumed to lead to changes in gene expression which are important for the pathogenesis of this tumour. However, this assumption has yet to be formally tested at a global level. Therefore a genome wide analysis of chromosome copy number and gene expression was performed in tumour cells micro-dissected from the same NPC biopsies. Cellular tumour suppressor and tumour-promoting genes (TSG, TPG) and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-encoded oncogenes were examined. The EBV-encoded genome maintenance protein EBNA1, along with the putative oncogenes LMP1, LMP2 and BARF1 were expressed in the majority of NPCs that were analysed. Significant downregulation of expression in an average of 76 cellular TSGs per tumour was found, whilst a per-tumour average of 88 significantly upregulated, TPGs occurred. The expression of around 60% of putative TPGs and TSGs was both up-and down-regulated in different types of cancer, suggesting that the simplistic classification of genes as TSGs or TPGs may not be entirely appropriate and that the concept of context-dependent onco-suppressors may be more extensive than previously recognised. No significant enrichment of TPGs within regions of frequent genomic gain was seen but TSGs were significantly enriched within regions of frequent genomic loss. It is suggested that loss of the FHIT gene may be a driver of NPC tumourigenesis. Notwithstanding the association of TSGs with regions of genomic loss, on a gene by gene basis and excepting homozygous deletions and high-level amplification, there is very little correlation between chromosomal copy number aberrations and expression levels of TSGs and TPGs in NPC.PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(7):e41055. · 4.09 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Jaap M. Middeldorp
Article: Contributions of the Epstein-Barr virus EBNA1 protein to gastric carcinoma.
Nirojini Sivachandran, Christopher W Dawson, Lawrence S Young, Fei-Fei Liu, Jaap Middeldorp, Lori Frappier[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Approximately 10% of gastric carcinomas (GC) are comprised of cells latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV); however, the mechanism by which EBV contributes to the development of this malignancy is unclear. We have investigated the cellular effects of the only EBV nuclear protein expressed in GC, EBNA1, focusing on promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear bodies (NBs), which play important roles in apoptosis, p53 activation, and tumor suppression. AGS GC cells infected with EBV were found to contain fewer PML NBs and less PML protein than the parental EBV-negative AGS cells, and these levels were restored by silencing EBNA1. Conversely, EBNA1 expression was sufficient to induce the loss of PML NBs and proteins in AGS cells. Consistent with PML functions, EBNA1 expression decreased p53 activation and apoptosis in response to DNA damage and resulted in increased cell survival. In addition, EBNA1 mutants unable to bind CK2 kinase or ubiquitin-specific protease 7 had decreased ability to induce PML loss and to interfere with p53 activation. PML levels in EBV-positive and EBV-negative GC biopsy specimens were then compared by immunohistochemistry. Consistent with the results in the AGS cells, EBV-positive tumors had significantly lower PML levels than EBV-negative tumors. The results indicate that EBV infection of GC cells leads to loss of PML NBs through the action of EBNA1, resulting in impaired responses to DNA damage and promotion of cell survival. Therefore, PML disruption by EBNA1 is one mechanism by which EBV may contribute to the development of gastric cancer.Journal of Virology 01/2012; 86(1):60-8. · 5.40 Impact Factor -
Article: Is human papillomavirus viral load a clinically useful predictive marker? A longitudinal study.
Christothea Constandinou-Williams, Stuart I Collins, Sally Roberts, Lawrence S Young, Ciaran B J Woodman, Paul G Murray[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It has been suggested that in women who test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types, viral load can distinguish women who are at increased risk of cervical neoplasia from those who are not. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to measure HPV copy number in serial samples taken from 60 and 58 young women previously found to have incident cervical HPV16 or HPV18 infections, respectively, using GP5+/GP6+ primers; women provided at least three samples for qPCR testing, at least one of which was positive. A 10-fold increase in HPV16 or HPV18 copy number was associated with a modestly increased risk of acquiring a cytologic abnormality [HPV16: hazards ratio, 1.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.25); HPV18: hazards ratio, 1.59 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.03)]. However, in most women, copy number increased during follow-up, before decreasing again. In women with a HPV16 infection, the median copy number per 1,000 cells was 7.7 in their first qPCR HPV-positive sample, 1,237 in the sample yielding the maximum copy number, and 7.8 in their last qPCR HPV-positive sample; corresponding copy numbers for women with HPV18 infection were 2.3, 87, and 2.4. Maximum HPV16 and HPV18 copy number did not differ significantly between women who acquired an incident cervical cytologic abnormality and those who did not. Whereas large relative increases in copy number are associated with an increased risk of abnormality, a single measurement of viral load made at an indeterminate point during the natural history of HPV infection does not reliably predict the risk of acquiring cervical neoplasia. Therefore, a single measure of HPV viral load cannot be considered a clinically useful biomarker.Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 03/2010; 19(3):832-7. · 4.12 Impact Factor