Publications (101) View all
-
Article: Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in Breast Cancer: Safely Avoiding Frozen Section of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results provided convincing evidence that completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) was unnecessary in selected patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). We hypothesized that preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) with fine-needle aspiration is sufficiently sensitive to detect worrisome macrometastasis to preclude the need for frozen-section pathology of SLNs. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single-institution study at a tertiary academic referral center. A total of 1,140 T1 to 2 breast cancer patients who underwent SLN biopsy with or without CALND from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010 were reviewed. All patients had negative preoperative AUS with or without fine-needle aspiration. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four (13%) patients were node positive at surgery. Mean age, tumor size, histology, and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status were similar comparing 996 SLN-negative with 144 (13%) SLN-positive patients. Of the SLN-positive patients, 25% were premenopausal, 9% were estrogen receptor-negative, and 19% had additional lymph nodes at CALND. Only 19 (2%) patients had SLN metastasis ≥6 mm, 10 (1%) had metastasis >7 mm, and only 1 patient had ≥3 positive SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of preoperative AUS with or without fine-needle aspiration to management of patients who meet American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial eligibility criteria reduced the risk of macrometastasis measuring ≥6 mm to only 2%; very few of these patients would be premenopausal, have estrogen receptor-negative tumors, or ≥3 positive SLNs. With the addition of AUS with or without fine-needle aspiration, we endorse the conclusions of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial to avoid CALND, and see marginal gain in frozen-section analysis of SLNs.Journal of the American College of Surgeons 04/2013; · 4.55 Impact Factor -
Article: Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Bacterial Colonization of Surgical Drains After Breast and Axillary Operations.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:: To determine whether bacterial colonization of drains can be reduced by local antiseptic interventions. BACKGROUND:: Drains are a potential source of bacterial entry into surgical wounds and may contribute to surgical site infection after breast surgery. METHODS:: After institutional review board approval, patients undergoing total mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection were randomized to standard drain care (control) or drain antisepsis (treated). Standard drain care comprised twice daily cleansing with alcohol swabs. Antisepsis drain care included (1) a chlorhexidine disc at the drain exit site and (2) irrigation of the drain bulb twice daily with dilute sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's) solution. Culture results of drain fluid and tubing were compared between control and antisepsis groups. RESULTS:: Overall, 100 patients with 125 drains completed the study with 48 patients (58 drains) in the control group and 52 patients (67 drains) in the antisepsis group. Cultures of drain bulb fluid at 1 week were positive (1+ or greater growth) in 66% (38/58) of control drains compared with 21% (14/67) of antisepsis drains (P = 0.0001). Drain tubing cultures demonstrated more than 50 colony-forming units in 19% (8/43) of control drains versus 0% (0/53) of treated drains (P = 0.004). Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 6 patients (6%)-5 patients in the control group and 1 patient in the antisepsis group (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS:: Simple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions with a chlorhexidine disc and hypochlorite solution reduce bacterial colonization of drains. Based on these data, further study of drain antisepsis and its potential impact on surgical site infection rate is warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01286168).Annals of surgery 03/2013; · 7.90 Impact Factor -
Article: Breast masses in adolescents: clinical pearls in the diagnostic evaluation.
American family physician 08/2012; 86(4):325-6. · 1.70 Impact Factor -
Article: Factors associated with local-regional recurrence after a negative sentinel node dissection: results of the ACOSOG Z0010 trial.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine factors important in local-regional recurrence (LRR) in patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Z0010 was a prospective multicenter trial initiated in 1999 by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group to evaluate occult disease in SLNs and bone marrow of early-stage breast cancer patients. Participants included women with biopsy-proven T1-2 breast cancer with clinically negative nodes, planned for lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation. Women with clinical T1-2,N0,M0 disease underwent lumpectomy and SLN dissection. There was no axillary-specific treatment for H&E-negative SLNs, and clinicians were blinded to immunohistochemistry results. Systemic therapy was based on primary tumor factors. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine clinicopathologic factors associated with LRR. Of 5119 patients, 3904 (76.3%) had H&E-negative SLNs. Median age was 57 years (range 23-95). At median follow-up of 8.4 years, there were 127 local, 20 regional, and 134 distant recurrences. Factors associated with local-regional recurrence were hormone receptor-negative disease (P = 0.0004) and younger age (P = 0.047). In competing risk-regression models, hormone receptor-positive disease and use of chemotherapy were associated with reduction in local-regional recurrence. When local recurrence was included in the model as a time-dependent variable, older age, T2 disease, high tumor grade, and local recurrence were associated with reduced overall survival. Local-regional recurrences are rare in early-stage breast cancer patients with H&E-negative SLNs. Younger age and hormone receptor-negative disease are associated with higher event rates, and local recurrence is associated with reduced overall survival.Annals of surgery 08/2012; 256(3):428-36. · 7.90 Impact Factor -
Article: Balancing venous thromboembolism and hematoma after breast surgery.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purposes of this study are (1) to determine our institution's rate of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and hematomas following breast surgery, and (2) to compare our breast surgery VTE rate with both our general surgery population and the National surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) dataset. Prospectively collected NSQIP data from April 2006 to June 2010 were analyzed. Our institution's VTE rates, pharmacologic prophylaxis (PCP) utilization, and hematomas were reviewed for patients undergoing breast surgery. The VTE rate was compared with NSQIP patient populations. Among 4,579 breast operations at our institution over this time period, 988 (21.6 %) were analyzed through NSQIP. The VTE rate following breast operations was 4/988 (0.4 %): 0/236 for those with benign disease and 4/752 (0.5 %) for those with breast cancer (p = 0.58). PCP was received by 147/752 (19.5 %) cancer patients. In cancer patients, the hematoma rate requiring reoperation was 3/147 (2.0 %) in those receiving PCP and 12/605 (2.0 %) in those not receiving PCP (p = 1.0). Breast surgery patients had a similar VTE rate compared with the institutional general surgery population (0.7 %, p = 0.254) and versus national general surgery patients from NSQIP (0.7 %, p = 0.29). Our institution's VTE incidence for patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy was significantly higher than "like" NSQIP centers. Our breast surgery VTE rate was similar to our general surgery population. Our mastectomy population had a higher VTE incidence compared with other NSQIP sites. Patients undergoing mastectomy, especially if combined with axillary lymph node dissection or reconstruction, should be considered for routine PCP.Annals of Surgical Oncology 07/2012; 19(10):3230-5. · 4.17 Impact Factor
