Publications (102) View all
-
Article: Preeclampsia as a risk factor for diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Women with preeclampsia (PEC) and gestational hypertension (GH) exhibit insulin resistance during pregnancy, independent of obesity and glucose intolerance. Our aim was to determine whether women with PEC or GH during pregnancy have an increased risk of developing diabetes after pregnancy, and whether the presence of PEC/GH in addition to gestational diabetes (GDM) increases the risk of future (postpartum) diabetes. We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study for 1,010,068 pregnant women who delivered in Ontario, Canada between April 1994 and March 2008. Women were categorized as having PEC alone (n = 22,933), GH alone (n = 27,605), GDM alone (n = 30,852), GDM+PEC (n = 1,476), GDM+GH (n = 2,100), or none of these conditions (n = 925,102). Our main outcome was a new diagnosis of diabetes postpartum in the following years, up until March 2011, based on new records in the Ontario Diabetes Database. The incidence rate of diabetes per 1,000 person-years was 6.47 for women with PEC and 5.26 for GH compared with 2.81 in women with neither of these conditions. In the multivariable analysis, both PEC alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.08; 95% CI 1.97-2.19) and GH alone (HR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.83-2.07) were risk factors for subsequent diabetes. Women with GDM alone were at elevated risk of developing diabetes postpartum (HR = 12.77; 95% CI 12.44-13.10); however, the co-presence of PEC or GH in addition to GDM further elevated this risk (HR = 15.75; 95% CI 14.52-17.07, and HR = 18.49; 95% CI 17.12-19.96, respectively). Data on obesity were not available. Women with PEC/GH have a 2-fold increased risk of developing diabetes when followed up to 16.5 years after pregnancy, even in the absence of GDM. The presence of PEC/GH in the setting of GDM also raised the risk of diabetes significantly beyond that seen with GDM alone. A history of PEC/GH during pregnancy should alert clinicians to the need for preventative counseling and more vigilant screening for diabetes. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.PLoS Medicine 04/2013; 10(4):e1001425. · 16.27 Impact Factor -
Article: Differences in Birthweight Curves Between Newborns of Immigrant Mothers vs. Infants Born in Their Corresponding Native Countries: Systematic Overview.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Newborn weight may vary between ethnic groups, but it is not known if birthweight differences exist between term babies born to immigrant mothers compared with those born in their corresponding native countries. We completed a systematic review of all birthweight curves published between 1980 and 2012, based on at least 100 singleton deliveries. We compared the 10th, 50th and 90th percentile birthweight values at 40 weeks gestation for male and female infants born in their native country vs. those infants born to mothers who had emigrated from their native country to Ontario, Canada. For the 50th percentile values, we also calculated a standardised pooled weighted difference and 95% confidence interval [CI] for both sexes. We also assessed whether birthweight differed over time, or if the differences varied by the Human Development Index (HDI) value for the native country. A total of 31 studies from 21 different countries met the inclusion criteria, comprising 13 317 578 males and 12 859 119 females born at 40 weeks gestation. There was a small non-significant rise in reported birthweight percentile values between 1983 and 2006. Nearly all infants born to women in their native country had lower birthweights than those born to mothers who had emigrated from the same country to Canada at the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles. Overall, the 50th percentile weights differed by 115 g [95% CI 74, 156] for males and 122 g [95% CI 95, 150] for females. As HDI or median birthweight increased, birthweight differences were less pronounced, but not significantly so. Term birthweight percentiles are typically higher among term infants born to mother who immigrate to Canada than those of infants born in their respective native country.Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 03/2013; 27(2):118-30. · 2.31 Impact Factor -
Article: Nephrologist follow-up improves all-cause mortality of severe acute kidney injury survivors.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Survivors of severe acute kidney injury remain at high risk of death well after apparent recovery from the initial insult. Here we determine whether early nephrology follow-up after a hospitalization complicated by severe acute kidney injury associates with patient survival. This consisted of a cohort study of all hospitalized adults in Ontario from 1996 to 2008 with acute kidney injury who received temporary inpatient dialysis and survived for 90 days following discharge independent from dialysis. Propensity scores were used to match individuals with early nephrology follow-up, defined as a visit with a nephrologist within 90 days of discharge, to those without. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality of 3877 patients who met the eligibility criteria within a maximum follow-up of 2 years. A total of 1583 patients had early nephrology follow-up of whom 1184 were successfully matched 1:1 to those not receiving early follow-up. The incidence of all-cause mortality was lower in those patients with early nephrology follow-up compared with those without (8.4 compared with 10.6 per 100-patient years, hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI: 0.62-0.93)). Thus, early nephrology follow-up after hospitalization with acute kidney injury and temporary dialysis was associated with improved survival. This finding requires definitive testing in a randomized controlled trial.Kidney International advance online publication, 16 January 2013; doi:10.1038/ki.2012.451.Kidney International 01/2013; · 6.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Marital Status, Duration of Cohabitation, and Psychosocial Well-Being Among Childbearing Women: A Canadian Nationwide Survey.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objectives. We examined the joint associations of marital status and duration of cohabitation on self-reported intimate partner violence, substance use, and postpartum depression among childbearing women. Methods. We analyzed data from the 2006-2007 Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey, a cross-sectional nationwide sample of 6421 childbearing women. Cohabiting women were married or nonmarried women living with a partner; noncohabiters were single, divorced, or separated women. We further categorized cohabiters by their duration of cohabitation (≤ 2, 3-5, or > 5 years). We used logistic regression to generate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results. About 92% of women were cohabiters. Compared with married women living with a husband more than 5 years, unmarried women cohabiting for 2 years or less were at higher odds of intimate partner violence (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.85, 7.56), substance use (AOR = 5.36; 95% CI = 3.06, 9.39), and postpartum depression (AOR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.25, 2.80); these risk estimates declined with duration of cohabitation. Conclusions. Research on maternal and child health would benefit from distinguishing between married and unmarried cohabiting women, and their duration of cohabitation. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print December 13, 2012: e1-e8. doi:10. 2105/AJPH.2012.301116).American Journal of Public Health 12/2012; · 3.93 Impact Factor -
Article: One size does not fit all: differences in newborn weight among mothers of philippine and other East asian origin.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objective: To determine the likelihood that infants born to Filipina, other East Asian, and Canadian-born women may be misclassified as small for gestational age when using conventional Canadian birth weight curves rather than those specific to their world region. Methods: We conducted a population-based study of 548 418 singleton live births in Ontario between 2002 and 2007. Smoothed birth weight percentile curves were generated for males and females born to women from Canada, the Philippines, and the rest of East Asia/Pacific. We determined the likelihood of misclassifying an infant as small for gestational age (SGA < 10th percentile weight) or large for gestational age (LGA ≥ 90th percentile weight) on a Canadian-born birth weight curve vs. a curve specific to the other two world regions. Results: For gestation-specific 10th and 50th percentiles, term infants born to women from the Philippines often had significantly lower birth weights than infants of Canadian-born mothers. Controlling for maternal age and parity, approximately 88 per 1000 male newborns (95% CI 82 to 95) and 72 per 1000 female newborns (95% CI 54 to 60) of mothers from the Philippines were at risk of being misclassified as SGA. LGA would be missed in approximately 54 per 1000 male newborns (95% CI 49 to 59) and 49 per 1000 female newborns (95% CI 44 to 54) of Filipina mothers. Misclassification of both SGA and LGA was more pronounced among infants of Filipina mothers than of mothers from other East Asian origin. Conclusions: Infants of mothers born in the Philippines weigh significantly less than those of Canadian-born women or mothers emigrating from other East Asian countries. Those who use birth weight curves should consider these differences.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC 11/2012; 34(11):1026-37.
