Publications (35) View all
-
Article: Prevalence of Pain-Predominant Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Somatic Symptoms in Patients with Anxiety or Depressive Disorders.
Desale Yacob, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Jeffrey A Bridge, Patricia Fine Rosenstein, Matthew Onorato, Terrill Bravender, John V Campo[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether children with symptoms of internalizing psychiatric disorders have a greater prevalence of pain-predominant functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and migraine-like headaches. STUDY DESIGN: Children and adolescents aged 6-18 years were recruited from a behavioral health center (n = 31) and a primary care center (n = 36). Subjects completed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-based symptom inventory questionnaires to screen for internalizing psychiatric disorders, the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and a somatic distress assessment interview. RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects (19 of 31 from the behavioral health center and 14 of 36 from the primary care center) screened positive for symptoms of anxiety or depressive disorders. The remainder screened negative and served as controls. Pain-predominant FGIDs were more common in the group with symptoms of anxiety or depression compared with controls (prevalence, 51.5% vs 8.8%; P = .0002). Migraine headaches occurred in 57.6% of the subjects with internalizing psychiatric disorders vs 23.5% of the control group (P = .006). The prevalence of functional constipation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The data remained essentially unchanged when analyzed within each center of recruitment. CONCLUSION: Youths with anxiety or depressive symptoms are more likely to suffer from pain-predominant FGIDs and migraine-like headaches, but not from functional constipation. The lack of an association between functional constipation and internalizing psychiatric symptoms suggests that FGIDs associated with pain may bear a specific relationship to emotional disorders.The Journal of pediatrics 03/2013; · 4.02 Impact Factor -
Article: Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ): A Brief Instrument for the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Lisa M Horowitz, Jeffrey A Bridge, Stephen J Teach, Elizabeth Ballard, Jennifer Klima, Donald L Rosenstein, Elizabeth A Wharff, Katherine Ginnis, Elizabeth Cannon, Paramjit Joshi, Maryland Pao[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE To develop a brief screening instrument to assess the risk for suicide in pediatric emergency department patients. DESIGN A prospective, cross-sectional instrument-development study evaluated 17 candidate screening questions assessing suicide risk in young patients. The Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire served as the criterion standard. SETTING Three urban, pediatric emergency departments associated with tertiary care teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 524 patients aged 10 to 21 years who presented with either medical/surgical or psychiatric chief concerns to the emergency department between September 10, 2008, and January 5, 2011. MAIN EXPOSURES Participants answered 17 candidate questions followed by the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the best-fitting combinations of screening questions for detecting elevated risk for suicide. RESULTS A total of 524 patients were screened (344 medical/surgical and 180 psychiatric). Fourteen of the medical/surgical patients (4%) and 84 of the psychiatric patients (47%) were at elevated suicide risk on the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. Of the 17 candidate questions, the best-fitting model comprised 4 questions assessing current thoughts of being better off dead, current wish to die, current suicidal ideation, and past suicide attempt. This model had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI, 91.3-99.4), specificity of 87.6% (95% CI, 84.0-90.5), and negative predictive values of 99.7% (95% CI, 98.2-99.9) for medical/surgical patients and 96.9% (95% CI, 89.3-99.6) for psychiatric patients. CONCLUSIONS A 4-question screening instrument, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), with high sensitivity and negative predictive value, can identify the risk for suicide in patients presenting to pediatric emergency departments.Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine 10/2012; · 3.73 Impact Factor -
Article: Payment source and emergency management of deliberate self-harm.
Steven C Marcus, Jeffrey A Bridge, Mark Olfson[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We investigated whether health insurance type (private vs Medicaid) influences the delivery of acute mental health care to patients with deliberate self-harm. Using National Medicaid Analytic Extract Files (2006) and MarketScan Research Databases (2005-2007), we analyzed claims focusing on emergency episodes of deliberate self-harm of Medicaid- (n=8,228) and privately (n=2,352) insured adults. We analyzed emergency department mental health assessments and outpatient mental health visits in the 30 days following the emergency visit for discharged patients. Medicaid-insured patients were more likely to be discharged (62.7%), and among discharged patients they were less likely to receive a mental health assessment in the emergency department (47.8%) and more likely to receive follow-up outpatient mental health care (52.9%) than were privately insured patients (46.9%, 57.3%, and 41.2%, respectively). Acute emergency management of deliberate self-harm is less intensive for Medicaid- than for privately insured patients, although discharged Medicaid-insured patients are more likely to receive follow-up care. Programmatic reforms are needed to improve access to emergency mental health services, especially in hospitals that serve substantial numbers of Medicaid-insured patients.American Journal of Public Health 04/2012; 102(6):1145-53. · 3.93 Impact Factor -
Article: Impaired decision making in adolescent suicide attempters.
Jeffrey A Bridge, Sandra M McBee-Strayer, Elizabeth A Cannon, Arielle H Sheftall, Brady Reynolds, John V Campo, Kathleen A Pajer, Rémy P Barbe, David A Brent[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Decision-making deficits have been linked to suicidal behavior in adults. However, it remains unclear whether impaired decision making plays a role in the etiopathogenesis of youth suicidal behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine decision-making processes in adolescent suicide attempters and never-suicidal comparison subjects. Using the Iowa Gambling Task, the authors examined decision making in 40 adolescent suicide attempters, 13 to 18 years old, and 40 never-suicidal, demographically matched psychiatric comparison subjects. Overall, suicide attempters performed significantly worse on the Iowa Gambling Task than comparison subjects. This difference in overall task performance between the groups persisted in an exact conditional logistic regression analysis that controlled for affective disorder, current psychotropic medication use, impulsivity, and hostility (adjusted odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.90-0.99, p < 0.05). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant group-by-block interaction, demonstrating that attempters failed to learn during the task, picking approximately the same proportion of disadvantageous cards in the first and final blocks of the task. In contrast, comparison subjects picked proportionately fewer cards from the disadvantageous decks as the task progressed. Within the attempter group, overall task performance did not correlate with any characteristic of the index attempt or with the personality dimensions of impulsivity, hostility, and emotional lability. Similar to findings in adults, impaired decision making is associated with suicidal behavior in adolescents. Longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the temporal relationship between decision-making processes and suicidal behavior and to help frame potential targets for early identification and preventive interventions to reduce youth suicide and suicidal behavior.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 04/2012; 51(4):394-403. · 4.98 Impact Factor -
Article: Outpatient care of young people after emergency treatment of deliberate self-harm.
Jeffrey A Bridge, Steven C Marcus, Mark Olfson[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little is known about the mental health care received by young people after an episode of deliberate self-harm. This study examined predictors of emergency department (ED) discharge, mental health assessments in the ED, and follow-up outpatient mental health care for Medicaid-covered youth with deliberate self-harm. A retrospective longitudinal cohort analysis was conducted of national 2006 Medicaid claims data supplemented with the Area Resource File and a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Medicaid policy survey of state policy characteristics focusing on ED treatment episodes by youth 10 to 19 years old for deliberate self-harm (n = 3,241). Rates and adjusted risk ratios (ARR) of discharge to the community, mental health assessments in the ED, and outpatient visits during the 30 days after the ED visit were assessed. Most patients (72.9%) were discharged to the community. Discharge was inversely related to recent psychiatric hospitalization (ARR 0.75, 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.90). Thirty-nine percent of discharged patients received a mental health assessment in the ED and a roughly similar percentage (43.0%) received follow-up outpatient mental health care. Follow-up mental health care was directly related to recent outpatient (ARR 2.58, 99% CI 2.27-2.94) and inpatient (ARR 1.33, 99% CI 1.14-1.56) mental health care and inversely related to Hispanic ethnicity (ARR 0.78, 99% CI 0.64-0.95) and residence in a county with medium-to-high poverty rates (ARR 0.84, 99% CI 0.73-0.97). A substantial proportion of young Medicaid beneficiaries who present to EDs with deliberate self-harm are discharged to the community and do not receive emergency mental health assessments or follow-up outpatient mental health care.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 02/2012; 51(2):213-222.e1. · 4.98 Impact Factor