Publications (74) View all
-
Dataset: Editorial DG Wyse: Idiopathic AF: A rose by any other name?
-
Article: [Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation: General practitioner, cardiologist and patient's points of view.]
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: AIMS: This French study was set up to collect perceptions of general practitioners (GPs), cardiologists and patients on anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the management of thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation (AF). METHOD: This is a prospective survey conducted in France, between July 1 and August 7 2011, on a sample defined to obtain a sufficient number of patient files of 133 physicians, divided into 65 cardiologists and 68 GPs. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-four patients on VKA and 130 patients not receiving VKA were included in this study. For more than one in three patients, AF was diagnosed incidentally in a medical consultation for another reason. In addition, 15% and 23% of diagnoses of FA were performed after hospitalization for stroke or TIA by cardiologists and GPs, respectively. According to the patient, the doctor contacted first is a GP (52% for the GP vs. 35.5% for the cardiologist), but they state that the diagnosis was made mainly by a cardiologist (63% for the cardiologist vs. 27% for the GP). In 78% of cases, cardiologists are initial prescribers. A CHADS2 score of 0 was found in 23% of patients not receiving VKA and in 11% of patients on VKA. A CHADS2 score superior or equal to 2 is significantly more frequently found in patients with paroxysmal AF. Concerning the monitoring of the patient, GPs ensure mainly monitoring of INR. In terms of compliance, according to doctors, their patients systematically take their treatment in 91% of cases. However, by interviewing patients, 60% of non-compliant patients are considered compliant by their physician. CONCLUSION: This study has achieved an overview of anticoagulation treatment in AF, in France. The initiation is mainly ensured by the cardiologist and the monitoring by the GP. Assessments between cardiologists and GPs are relatively similar, however, it appears that anticoagulation treatment is under-prescribed for the patients at risk.La Presse Médicale 03/2013; · 0.67 Impact Factor -
Article: Actualización de las guías de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología (ESC) para el manejo de la fibrilación auricular de 2010 Elaborada en colaboración con la Asociación Europea del Ritmo Cardiaco.
Revista Espa de Cardiologia 01/2013; 66(1):54.e1-54.e24. · 2.53 Impact Factor -
Article: Management of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias in humans: towards a patient-specific approach.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The strategy of sudden cardiac death prevention by implantable cardioverter defibrillator, in primary prevention, is mainly based on the value of ejection fraction. That means that the approach is not really patient specific. A lot of implanted patients will not receive any shock. The implantation of large categories of patients is interesting on a global therapeutical point of view but, when considering the economical aspects, it would be more useful to have better selection criteria in order to obtain a more patient-specific approach, avoiding implanting patients who will never receive shocks. The parameters commonly used to select patients for implantations have a good negative predictive value but a low positive predictive value. Concerning atrial fibrillation the approach is quite different. Antiarrhythmic drug treatment has shown many limitations. Antiarrhythmic drugs are useful and safe in atrial fibrillation patients only if the contra-indications are strictly respected. The main difficulty concerns patients with both heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The story of Dronedarone development is illustrative of the necessity of a patient-specific approach in the treatment strategy of atrial fibrillation. The ATHENA trial made with Dronedarone showed a benefit in patients with underlying heart disease but no patient with advanced cardiopathy was included in the study. On the contrary, the PALLAS trial has clearly shown that the drug is contra-indicated in patients with any type of heart failure. In atrial fibrillation, a patient-specific approach is mandatory. This review illustrates the dichotomy of the two different approaches.Europace 11/2012; 14 Suppl 5:v125-v128. · 1.98 Impact Factor -
Article: Review of novel therapeutics by three regulatory agencies.
New England Journal of Medicine 09/2012; 367(12):1166; author reply 1166-7. · 53.30 Impact Factor
