Publications (120) View all
-
Article: Circumflex artery related myocardial infarction: Less reperfusion therapy and large infarct size.
Vincent Roolvink, Saman Rasoul, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, Marcel Gosselink, Jan C A Hoorntje, Rik Hermanides, Harry Suryapranata, Arnoud W J van 't HofInternational journal of cardiology 02/2013; · 7.08 Impact Factor -
Article: Impact of vessel size on distal embolization, myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Giuseppe De Luca, Harry Suryapranata, Menko-Jan de Boer, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Jan C. A. Hoorntje, A. T. Marcel Gosselink, Jan-Henk E. Dambrink, Arnoud W. J. van’t Hof[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background Mounting interest has emerged on the role of distal embolization as a major explanation of poor myocardial perfusion among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary angioplasty. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between vessel size, distal embolization, myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome in patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty. Methods Our population is represented by 1969 patients with STEMI undergoing primary stenting from 1997 to 2002. All clinical, angiographic, and follow-up data were prospectively collected. Results Vessel size was linearly associated with gender, diabetes, anterior infarction location, shorter time-delay, the rate of stenting and glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. Small vessel size was associated with poor perfusion, despite lower rates of distal embolization. These data were confirmed after correction for confounding factors. The higher risk profile and poor myocardial perfusion contribute to explain the worse outcome observed in patients with smaller vessel size. Conclusions This study shows that in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for STEMI, small vessel size is associated with poor myocardial perfusion, despite less distal embolization, that contributes to explain the worse outcome observed among patients with small infarct related arteries.Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 04/2012; 27(2):198-203. · 1.48 Impact Factor -
Article: Net clinical benefit of prehospital glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and high risk of bleeding: effect of tirofiban in patients at high risk of bleeding using CRUSADE bleeding score.
Renicus S Hermanides, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Jurrien M ten Berg, A T Marcel Gosselink, Gert van Houwelingen, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, Pieter R Stella, Christian Hamm, Arnoud W J van 't Hof[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the net clinical effect of prehospital administration of tirofiban in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with high risk of bleeding. This is a retrospective subanalysis of the On- TIME 2 trial, a multicenter, controlled randomized trial of the effects of high bolus-dose tirofiban given in the ambulance in STEMI patients. Tirofiban was given on top of aspirin, heparin, and clopidogrel. According to CRUSADE, patients with a moderate to very high baseline risk of bleeding were defined as high risk and patients with a very low or low baseline bleeding risk were defined as low risk. Primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days (defined as the combined incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, or non-coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]-related major bleeding). Of 1309 patients, a high bleeding risk was present in 291 patients (22.2%). In these high-risk bleeding patients, tirofiban significantly improved after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ST-segment resolution. Administration of tirofiban in high-risk bleeding patients showed no difference in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (9.4% vs 13.0%; P=.330; relative risk [RR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-1.39). However, pretreatment with tirofiban was associated with a nonsignificant increase in non-CABG related bleeding (8.6% vs 3.6%; P=.082; RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 0.90-6.39). The net clinical effect (30-day NACE) of tirofiban in this group was balanced (11.5% vs 15.2%; P=.365; RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.41-1.38). Prehospital use of tirofiban in STEMI patients with high risk of bleeding improves post-PCI ST-segment resolution, but increases nonsignificantly the risk of non-CABG related bleeding. The net result is a balanced effect on 30-day NACE. Additional studies should clarify how use of bleeding risk scores should modify medical (antiplatelet) therapy.The Journal of invasive cardiology 03/2012; 24(3):84-9. · 1.84 Impact Factor -
Article: The effect of pre-hospital glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors on angiographic outcome in STEMI patients who are candidates for primary PCI.
Renicus S Hermanides, J Wouter van Werkum, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Nicoline J Breet, A T Marcel Gosselink, K Gert van Houwelingen, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, Christian Hamm, Jurrien M ten Berg, Arnoud W J van 't Hof[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aim of this study was to assess the effect of early initiation of high bolus dose tirofiban on top of dual antiplatelet therapy on angiographic outcome before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infraction patients. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are effective inhibitors of platelet aggregation, and have shown to reduce thrombotic complications in patients undergoing PCI. This is a pre-specified angiographic analysis of the On-TIME 2 trial (N = 984) and its open label run-in phase (N = 414). All angiographic parameters, including quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were performed in an independent angiographic core lab. Of the 1,398 patients, 709 patients (50.7%) were randomized to pre-hospital tirofiban. An open infarct related vessel (TIMI 2 or 3 flow) at initial angiography was more often present in the tirofiban group as compared to the no tirofiban group (58.3% vs. 49.7%, P = 0.002). Tirofiban also reduced initial thrombus burden (P for trend = 0.035) as well as thrombus grade 5 (46.9% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.016) and showed a trend toward a reduction in large thrombus burden (LTB) (69.4% vs. 74.5%, P = 0.055). After PCI, a trend towards a lower corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) in the tirofiban group was found. A significant interaction was found with time of initiation of study drug, with highest efficacy of tirofiban when given within 76 min after symptom onset, with a significantly lower cTFC after PCI (21.9 ± 17.6 vs. 23.9 ± 18.5, P = 0.008, P for interaction P = 0.006). In patients undergoing primary PCI, pre-hospital administration of tirofiban reduces initial thrombus burden and improves initial patency of the infarct related vessel before PCI. Initiation of tirofiban seems to be most effective when given very early after the onset of symptoms; however, this finding needs confirmation in other studies. The On-TIME 2 trial is registered, at http://isrctn.org, number ISRCTN06195297.Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 12/2011; 79(6):956-64. · 2.29 Impact Factor -
Article: Predictors and importance of prolonged hospital stay after primary PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction
Dirk AAM Schellings, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Arnoud WJ van ‘t Hof, Menko-Jan de Boer, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, Jan CA Hoorntje, Marcel Gosselink and, Harry Suryapranata, on behalf of the Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objective: Although most patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have a good prognosis and can be discharged from hospital very soon, some patients must be admitted longer. We performed the current analysis to assess predictors and the prognostic significance of prolonged hospital stay. Patients and methods: In this prospective observational study, individual data from 2323 patients who survived at least 2 days after primary PCI in our hospital were recorded. Patients in the highest tertile of hospital stay were compared with the other patients. Both predictors and prognostic importance of prolonged hospital stay were evaluated. Results: Mean admission duration was 6.7 days (standard deviation=6.6). A total of 797 patients had a hospital stay for more than 6 days (highest tertile). Patients with a longer hospital stay were older, more often female, had more often a history of previous myocardial infarction and signs of heart failure on admission, and had more frequently Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 before PCI. In addition, a low left ventricular ejection fraction was independently associated with prolonged hospital stay [odds ratio: 2.06 (95% confidence interval: 1.54–2.76)], but with a comparable risk of 1-year mortality [odds ratio: 1.3 (95% confidence interval: 0.8–2.0)]. Conslusion: According to this study, a low left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with prolonged hospital stay in patients after primary PCI. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay are age, female sex, previous myocardial infarction, heart failure on admission, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 before PCI.Coronary Artery Disease 10/2011; 22(7):458–462. · 1.24 Impact Factor