James A Cranford |
|
Ph.D., Social Psychology
|
| a |
| a |
| a |
| a |
30.77
Research experience
-
Aug 2002–
presentResearch: University of Michigan
University of Michigan · Department of PsychiatryUSA · Ann Arbor -
Aug 2000–
Jul 2002Research: New York University
New York University · Department of Psychology · NYU Couples LabUSA · New York City
Education
-
Sep 1994–
May 2000University at Albany, State University of New York
Social Psychology · Ph.D.USA · Albany, NY
Other
-
Scientific MembershipsAssociation for Psychological Science
Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Research Society on Alcoholism
Publications (48) View all
-
Article: The effect of drinking goals at treatment entry on longitudinal alcohol use patterns among adults with alcohol dependence.
Orion Mowbray, Amy R Krentzman, Jaclyn C Bradley, James A Cranford, Elizabeth A R Robinson, Andrew Grogan-Kaylor[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Drinking goals at treatment entry are a promising, yet under-studied mechanism of change in alcohol use following treatment. It is not known who, upon treatment entry, is likely to desire abstinence as a drinking goal and whether desiring abstinence as a drinking goal influences alcohol use following treatment. METHODS: Data from a 2.5-year longitudinal study of alcohol-dependent adults from 3 treatment sites is examined in a secondary data analysis. At treatment entry, participants reported sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, as well as whether they desired abstinence as a drinking goal or not. At each subsequent wave, participants reported their alcohol use. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses showed that individuals from a VA outpatient treatment site, men, and racial or ethnic minorities were most likely to desire abstinence as a drinking goal at treatment entry. Multi-level mixed effects regression models indicated that individuals who at baseline desired abstinence as a drinking goal sustained higher percentage of days abstinent and higher percentage of days since last drink 2.5 years following treatment entry, compared to individuals who did not desire abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding who is most likely to desire the specific drinking goal of abstinence can assist clinicians in anticipating client response to goal setting. Furthermore, by understanding the benefits and risks associated with drinking goals, clinicians can focus attention to individuals who desire a more risk-laden goal, including goals of non-abstinence, and tailor interventions, including motivational interviewing techniques, to support effective goals.Drug and alcohol dependence 02/2013; · 3.60 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Amy R Krentzman
Article: Multiple Dimensions of Spirituality in Recovery: A Lagged Mediational Analysis of Alcoholics Anonymous' Principal Theoretical Mechanism of Behavior Change.
Amy R Krentzman, James A Cranford, Elizabeth A R Robinson[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) states that recovery is possible through spiritual experiences and spiritual awakenings. Research examining spirituality as a mediator of AA's effect on drinking has been mixed. It is unknown whether such findings are due to variations in the operationalization of key constructs, such as AA and spirituality. To answer these questions, the authors used a longitudinal model to test 2 dimensions of AA as focal predictors and 6 dimensions of spirituality as possible mediators of AA's association with drinking. Data from the first 18 months of a 3-year longitudinal study of 364 alcohol-dependent individuals were analyzed. Structural equation modeling was used to replicate the analyses of Kelly et al. (Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:454-463) and to compare AA attendance and AA involvement as focal predictors. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine which spirituality dimensions changed as the result of AA participation. A trimmed, data-driven model was employed to test multiple mediation paths simultaneously. The findings of the Kelly et al. study were replicated. AA involvement was a stronger predictor of drinking outcomes than AA attendance. AA involvement predicted increases in private religious practices, daily spiritual experiences, and forgiveness of others. However, only private religious practices mediated the relationship between AA and drinking.Substance Abuse 01/2013; 34(1):20-32. · 1.33 Impact Factor -
Article: Motivational subtypes of nonmedical use of prescription medications: results from a national study.
Sean Esteban McCabe, James A Cranford[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Very little research has examined the heterogeneity associated with the nonmedical use of prescription medications (NUPM) in nationally representative samples of adolescents. The main objectives of this study were to (1) identify motivational subtypes of past-year NUPM among high school seniors in the United States using a person-centered approach, and (2) examine the associations among motivational subtypes and characteristics of substance abuse (i.e., route of administration, co-ingestion, and subjective high). Self-administered questionnaires as part of the Monitoring the Future study were completed by nationally representative samples of high school seniors (modal age, 18 years). The sample consisted of five cohorts (senior years of 2002-2006) made up of 12,431 high school seniors in total, of which 53% were women. Approximately 75% of past-year nonmedical users of prescription opioids, stimulants, and tranquilizers endorsed more than one motive. Latent class analysis indicated five motivational subtypes associated with nonmedical use of prescription opioids (experiment, relax, get high, pain relief, and affect regulation), four subtypes of prescription stimulants (weight loss/enhance energy, enhance energy/awake/high, experiment, and affect regulation), and five subtypes of prescription tranquilizers (experiment, get high, relax/sleep, relax, affect regulation). Recreational subtypes were positively associated with characteristics of substance abuse, whereas self-treatment subtypes were associated with medical use before nonmedical use. Because multiple motives underlie NUPM, identifying subgroups of individuals who endorse combinations of motives, versus a single motive, will better inform intervention efforts to reduce nonmedical prescription medication use.Journal of Adolescent Health 11/2012; 51(5):445-52. · 3.33 Impact Factor -
Article: Nonmedical use of prescription opioids among adolescents: subtypes based on motivation for use.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to advance our understanding of nonmedical use of prescription medications by identifying the distinguishing characteristics of 2 subtypes of adolescent nonmedical users of prescription opioids that have been previously described. A Web-based, self-administered survey was completed by 2,597 7th-12th grade students. Sensation-seeking nonmedical users were best characterized by rule breaking and aggressive behaviors and possible substance dependence. Medical users and nonmedical self-treating users were best characterized by somatic complaints, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and history of sexual victimization.Journal of Addictive Diseases 10/2012; 31(4):332-41. · 1.46 Impact Factor -
Article: Incentives for college student participation in web-based substance use surveys.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two incentive conditions (a $10 pre-incentive only vs. a $2 pre-incentive and a $10 promised incentive) on response rates, sample composition, substantive data, and cost-efficiency in a survey of college student substance use and related behaviors. Participants were 3000 randomly-selected college students invited to participate in a survey on substance use. Registrar data on all invitees was used to compare response rates and respondents, and web-based data collection on participants was used to compare substantive findings. Participants randomized to the pre-incentive plus promised incentive condition were more likely to complete the survey and less likely to give partial responses. Subgroup differences by sex, class year, and race were evaluated among complete responders, although only sex differences were significant. Men were more likely to respond in the pre-incentive plus promised incentive condition than the pre-incentive only condition. Substantive data did not differ across incentive structure, although the pre-incentive plus promised incentive condition was more cost-efficient. Survey research on college student populations is warranted to support the most scientifically sound and cost-efficient studies possible. Although substantive data did not differ, altering the incentive structure could yield cost savings with better response rates and more representative samples.Addictive behaviors 09/2012; 38(3):1710-1714. · 2.25 Impact Factor