Skills (15)
-
29 Questions4048 Followers
-
18 Questions3689 Followers
-
74 Questions25027 Followers
-
52 Questions10131 Followers
-
148 Questions8443 Followers
-
105 Questions12793 Followers
-
77 Questions8171 Followers
-
63 Questions11068 Followers
-
9 Questions1562 Followers
-
1637 Questions105818 Followers
-
10 Questions2364 Followers
-
393 Questions59849 Followers
-
25 Questions13427 Followers
-
76 Questions19927 Followers
-
28 Questions32527 Followers
Research experience
-
Jan 2013–
presentResearch: Università degli studi di Parma
Università degli studi di Parma · Department of Experimental MedicineItaly · Parma -
Jan 2012–
presentResearch: NYU Langone Medical Center
NYU Langone Medical CenterUSA · New York City -
Jan 2012–
presentResearch: University of Bradford
University of BradfordUnited Kingdom · Bradford -
Jan 2011–
presentResearch: The Jikei University School of Medicine
The Jikei University School of Medicine · Department of Internal Medicine HJapan · Tokyo -
Jan 2011–
presentResearch: Ospedale Oncologico "Giovanni Paolo II" di Bari
Ospedale Oncologico "Giovanni Paolo II" di BariItaly · Bari -
Jan 2010–
presentResearch: National Institutes of Health
National Institutes of HealthUSA · Bethesda -
Jan 2010–
presentResearch: Università di Pisa
Università di PisaItaly · Pisa -
Jan 2008–
Dec 2009Research: University of Porto
University of Porto · Faculdade de MedicinaPortugal · Porto -
Jan 2007–
presentResearch: University of Zurich
University of Zurich · Division of Cell BiologySwitzerland · Zürich -
Jan 2006–
presentResearch: Gomal University
Gomal UniversityPakistan · Dera Ismāīl Khān -
Jan 2004–
Dec 2010Research: Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet · Institutionen för anatomi, fysiologi och biokemiSweden · Uppsala -
Jan 2003–
presentResearch: Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Technion - Israel Institute of TechnologyIsrael · Haifa -
Jan 2002–
Dec 2011Research: VU medisch centrum
VU medisch centrum · Department of RheumatologyNetherlands · Amsterdam -
Jan 2002–
Dec 2003Research: University of Newcastle
University of NewcastleAustralia · Newcastle -
Jan 2002–
presentResearch: Sapienza University of Rome
Sapienza University of Rome · Department of MedicineItaly · Roma -
Jan 1999–
presentResearch: Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Vrije Universiteit BrusselBelgium · Brussels -
Jan 1994–
Dec 2006Research: Netherlands Cancer Institute
Netherlands Cancer InstituteNetherlands · Amsterdam -
Jan 1993–
Dec 2013Research: Vu University Medical Centre Amsterdam
Vu University Medical Centre AmsterdamNetherlands · Amsterdam -
Jan 1992–
presentResearch: National Institute of Oncology
National Institute of OncologyHungary · Budapest -
Jan 1991–
presentResearch: Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers SquibbUSA · New York City -
Jan 1988–
Dec 2002Research: VU University Amsterdam
VU University Amsterdam · Department of Medical OncologyNetherlands · Amsterdam
Questions and Answers (4) View all
-
Answer added in Cancer Biology19 Why can sulphorhodamine-B assay (SRB assay) for preliminary anticancer screening not be done with HL-60 Cells?By Alok Nahata · Dr. Harisingh Gour UniversityGodefridus Peters · VU medisch centrumI was one of the authors of this paper. We compared the SRB and MTT for a number of cell lines, in this paper and other papers. The IC50 values, the T... [more]I was one of the authors of this paper. We compared the SRB and MTT for a number of cell lines, in this paper and other papers. The IC50 values, the TGI and LC50 were similar, but SRB showed a better sensitivity and linearity. SRB can be performed on suspension cell lines such as HL-60 but is very inconvenient, since you have to spin down the cells after each step; since monolayer are attached cells, this is not necessary. SRB is een protein assay; MTT a metabolic assay, so when you start you need to continue and measure until you are ready.Following
-
Answer added in Cancer Biology19 Why can sulphorhodamine-B assay (SRB assay) for preliminary anticancer screening not be done with HL-60 Cells?By Alok Nahata · Dr. Harisingh Gour UniversityGodefridus Peters · VU medisch centrumBoth MTT and SRB assays are growth inhibition assays, although one will often see percentage survival in the Y-axis, which is incorrect. In a 1990 pap... [more]Both MTT and SRB assays are growth inhibition assays, although one will often see percentage survival in the Y-axis, which is incorrect. In a 1990 paper the NCI compared both assays and these yielded similar results for the 60-cell line panel of the NCI (Skehan et al, JNCI 82, 1107, 1990). We subsequently also tested whether the SRB assay can really estimate cell kill as well and compared the MTT with SRB in a large panel of cells and found similar data (Keepers et al, Eur J Cancer 27, 897,1991). However, the SRB is just very inconvenient for suspension cells, because of the multiple centrifugation steps. However, for solid tumor cells lines, it is much more convenient, rapid, more sensitive, while one can stop at several time points. However, take care to include a day 0 (day of drug addittion) in order to observe potential cell kill, which can be observed when values go below the day 0 value. Check the NCI website for correct protocol and calculation. http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/branches/btb/ivclsp.htmlFollowing
-
Answer added in Intraperitoneal Injections18 How do drugs get into the circulation by intraperitoneal injection?By Aiken Huang · Nankai UniversityGodefridus Peters · VU medisch centrumWhen properly done, ip injection is easy and efficient and gives the same bioavailability as IV injection which is more cumbersom in mice. I injected ... [more]When properly done, ip injection is easy and efficient and gives the same bioavailability as IV injection which is more cumbersom in mice. I injected thousands of mice with various anticancer drugs without problems. Gavage is oral, hence completely different and not comparable.Following
Publications (514) View all
-
Article: Non-canonical kinase signaling by the death ligand TRAIL in cancer cells: discord in the death receptor family.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-based therapy is currently evaluated in clinical studies as a tumor cell selective pro-apoptotic approach. However, besides activating canonical caspase-dependent apoptosis by binding to TRAIL-specific death receptors, the TRAIL ligand can activate non-canonical cell survival or proliferation pathways in resistant tumor cells through the same death receptors, which is counterproductive for therapy. Even more, recent studies indicate metastases-promoting activity of TRAIL. In this review, the remarkable dichotomy in TRAIL signaling is highlighted. An overview of the currently known mechanisms involved in non-canonical TRAIL signaling and the subsequent activation of various kinases is provided. These kinases include RIP1, IκB/ NF-κB, MAPK p38, JNK, ERK1/2, MAP3K TAK1, PKC, PI3K/Akt and Src. The functional consequences of their activation, often being stimulation of tumor cell survival and in some cases enhancement of their invasive behavior, are discussed. Interestingly, the non-canonical responses triggered by TRAIL in resistant tumor cells resemble that of TRAIL-induced signals in non-transformed cells. Better knowledge of the mechanism underlying the dichotomy in TRAIL receptor signaling may provide markers for selecting patients who will likely benefit from TRAIL-based therapy and could provide a rationalized basis for combination therapies with TRAIL death receptor-targeting drugs.Cell Death and Differentiation advance online publication, 12 April 2013; doi:10.1038/cdd.2013.28.Cell death and differentiation 04/2013; · 8.24 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Yergeri C Mayur
Article: Chemosensitizing acridones:In Vitro Calmodulin Dependent cAMP Phosphodiesterase Inhibition, Docking, Pharmacophore Modeling and 3d QSAR Studies
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Calmodulin inhibitors have proved to play a significant role in sensitizing MDR cancer cells by interfering with cellular drug accumulation. The present investigation focuses on the evaluation of in vitro inhibitory efficacy of chloro acridones against calmodulin dependent cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE1c). Moreover, molecular docking of acridones was performed with PDE1c in order to identify the possible protein ligand interactions and results thus obtained were compared with in vitro data. In addition an efficient pharmacophore model was developed from a set of 38 chemosensitizing acridones effective against doxorubicin resistant (HL-60/DX) cancer cell lines. Pharmacophoric features such as one hydrogen bond acceptor, one hydrophobic region, a positive ion group and three aromatic rings i.e., AHPRRR have been identified. Ligand based 3D-QSAR was also performed by employing partial least square regression analysis.Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 01/2013; 40:116-124. · 2.18 Impact Factor -
Article: Chemosensitizing acridones: In vitro calmodulin dependent cAMPphosphodiesterase inhibition, docking, pharmacophore modeling and 3D QSARstudies
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Calmodulin inhibitors have proved to play a significant role in sensitizing MDR cancer cells by interfering with cellular drug accumulation. The present investigation focuses on the evaluation of in vitro inhibitory efficacy of chloro acridones against calmodulin dependent cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE1c). Moreover, molecular docking of acridones was performed with PDE1c in order to identify the possible protein ligand interactions and results thus obtained were compared with in vitro data. In addition an efficient pharmacophore model was developed from a set of 38 chemosensitizing acridones effective against doxorubicin resistant (HL-60/DX) cancer cell lines. Pharmacophoric features such as one hydrogen bond acceptor, one hydrophobic region, a positive ion group and three aromatic rings i.e., AHPRRR have been identified. Ligand based 3D-QSAR was also performed by employing partial least square regression analysis.Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 01/2013; · 2.18 Impact Factor -
Article: The effect of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine combination therapy on the activity of three pivotal thiopurine metabolizing enzymes: Results from a prospective pharmacological study.
M L Seinen, D P van Asseldonk, N K H de Boer, N Losekoot, K Smid, C J J Mulder, G Bouma, G J Peters, A A van Bodegraven[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Thiopurine therapy is often discontinued in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor allopurinol has previously shown to enhance thiopurine efficacy and to prevent adverse reactions, the mechanism of this beneficial interaction is not completely clarified. The aim of this study is to observe possible effects of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine combination therapy on the activity of three pivotal thiopurine metabolizing enzymes. METHODS: A prospective study of IBD patients failing thiopurine therapy due to a skewed thiopurine metabolism was performed. Patients were treated with allopurinol and azathioprine or mercaptopurine. Xanthine oxidase, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT) and thiopurine S-methyl transferase (TPMT) activities, and thiopurine metabolites concentrations were measured during thiopurine monotherapy, and after 4 and 12weeks of combination therapy. RESULTS: Of fifteen IBD patients, XO activity decreased from 0.18 (IQR 0.08-0.3) during thiopurine monotherapy to 0.14 (IQR 0.06-0.2) and 0.11 (IQR 0.06-0.2; p=0.008) mU/hour/ml at 4 and 12weeks, respectively. HGPRT activity increased from 150 (IQR 114-176) to 180 (IQR 135-213) and 204nmol/(h×mg protein) (IQR 173-213; p=0.013). TPMT activity seemed not to be affected. 6-Thioguanine nucleotide concentrations increased from 138 (IQR 119-188) to 235 (223-304) and to 265pmol/8×10^8 (IQR 188-344), whereas 6-methyl mercaptopurine ribonucleotides concentrations decreased from 13230 (IQR 7130-17420) to 690 (IQR 378-1325) and 540 (IQR 240-790) pmol/8×10^8 at 4 and 12weeks of combination therapy (both p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Allopurinol and thiopurine combination-therapy seems to increase HGPRT and decrease XO activity in IBD patients, which at least in part may explain the observed changes in thiopurine metabolite concentrations.Journal of Crohn s and Colitis 01/2013; · 2.57 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: H-J. Prins
Article: Trifluorothymidine resistance is associated with decreased thymidine kinase and equilibrative nucleoside transporter expression or increased secretory phospholipase A2
O.H. Temmink, I.V. Bijnsdorp, H.J. Prins, N. Losekoot, A.D. Adema, K. Smid, R.J. Honeywell, B. Ylstra, P.P. Eijk, M. Fukushima, G.J. Peters[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Trifluorothymidine (TFT) is part of the novel oral formulation TAS-102, which is currently evaluated in phase II studies. Drug resistance is an important limitation of cancer therapy. The aim of the present study was to induce resistance to TFT in H630 colon cancer cells using two different schedules and to analyze the resistance mechanism. Cells were exposed either continuously or intermittently to TFT, resulting in H630-cTFT and H630-4TFT, respectively. Cells were analyzed for cross-resistance, cell cycle, protein expression, and activity of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), thymidine kinase (TK), thymidylate synthase (TS), equilibrative nucleoside transporter (hENT), gene expression (microarray), and genomic alterations. Both cell lines were cross-resistant to 2'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (>170-fold). Exposure to IC(75)-TFT increased the S/G(2)-M phase of H630 cells, whereas in the resistant variants, no change was observed. The two main target enzymes TS and TP remained unchanged in both TFT-resistant variants. In H630-4TFT cells, TK protein expression and activity were decreased, resulting in less activated TFT and was most likely the mechanism of TFT resistance. In H630-cTFT cells, hENT mRNA expression was decreased 2- to 3-fold, resulting in a 5- to 10-fold decreased TFT-nucleotide accumulation. Surprisingly, microarray-mRNA analysis revealed a strong increase of secretory phospholipase-A2 (sPLA2; 47-fold), which was also found by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR; 211-fold). sPLA2 inhibition reversed TFT resistance partially. H630-cTFT had many chromosomal aberrations, but the exact role of sPLA2 in TFT resistance remains unclear. Altogether, resistance induction to TFT can lead to different mechanisms of resistance, including decreased TK protein expression and enzyme activity, decreased hENT expression, as well as (phospho)lipid metabolism. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(4); 1047-57. (c)2010 AACRMolecular Cancer Therapeutics 12/2012; 9. · 5.23 Impact Factor