Publications (23) View all
-
Article: Three phenotypes of adult-onset asthma.
M Amelink, S B de Nijs, J C de Groot, P M B van Tilburg, P I van Spiegel, F H Krouwels, R Lutter, A H Zwinderman, E J M Weersink, A Ten Brinke, P J Sterk, E H Bel[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: RATIONALE: Adult-onset asthma differs from childhood-onset asthma in many respects. It is more heterogeneous, often severe and frequently associated with loss of lung function. To identify underlying mechanisms of adult-onset asthma and to capture predictors of disease progression, detailed characterization and phenotyping is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To characterize adult-onset asthma and identify subphenotypes of adult-onset asthma. METHODS: A cohort of 200 patients with adult-onset (>18 year) asthma (age 54 (26-75) year) was recruited from one academic and three nonacademic pulmonary outpatient clinics in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. These patients were fully characterized with respect to clinical, functional and inflammatory markers. After data reduction, K-means nonhierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify clusters of adult-onset asthma. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients with adult-onset asthma were predominately female (61%) and nonatopic (55%). Within this group of patients were identified three clusters of adult-onset asthma. Cluster 1 (n = 69) consisted of patients with severe eosinophilic inflammation-predominant asthma and persistent airflow limitation despite high-intensity anti-inflammatory treatment, with relatively low symptom scores. The second cluster was characterized by obese women with frequent symptoms, high healthcare utilization and low sputum eosinophils. The third cluster consisted of patients with mild-to-moderate, well-controlled asthma with normal lung function and low inflammatory markers. Repeatability accuracy was 98.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst patients with adult-onset asthma, three subphenotypes can be identified with distinct clinical and inflammatory characteristics. These subphenotypes help to understand the underlying pathobiology and provide clinicians with directions for personalized management.Allergy 05/2013; 68(5):674-680. · 6.27 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central
Article: Airway inflammation and mannitol challenge test in COPD.
Selma B de Nijs, Niki Fens, Rene Lutter, Erica Dijkers, Frans H Krouwels, Barbara S Smids-Dierdorp, Reindert P van Steenwijk, Peter J Sterk[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Eosinophilic airway inflammation has successfully been used to tailor anti-inflammatory therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) by indirect challenges is associated with airway inflammation. We hypothesized that AHR to inhaled mannitol captures eosinophilia in induced sputum in COPD. Twenty-eight patients (age 58 ± 7.8 yr, packyears 40 ± 15.5, post-bronchodilator FEV1 77 ± 14.0%predicted, no inhaled steroids ≥4 wks) with mild-moderate COPD (GOLD I-II) completed two randomized visits with hypertonic saline-induced sputum and mannitol challenge (including sputum collection). AHR to mannitol was expressed as response-dose-ratio (RDR) and related to cell counts, ECP, MPO and IL-8 levels in sputum. There was a positive correlation between RDR to mannitol and eosinophil numbers (r = 0.47, p = 0.03) and level of IL-8 (r = 0.46, p = 0.04) in hypertonic saline-induced sputum. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between RDR and eosinophil numbers (r = 0.71, p = 0.001), level of ECP (r = 0.72, p = 0.001), IL-8 (r = 0.57, p = 0.015) and MPO (r = 0.64, p = 0.007) in sputum collected after mannitol challenge. ROC-curves showed 60% sensitivity and 100% specificity of RDR for >2.5% eosinophils in mannitol-induced sputum. In mild-moderate COPD mannitol hyperresponsiveness is associated with biomarkers of airway inflammation. The high specificity of mannitol challenge suggests that the test is particularly suitable to exclude eosinophilic airways inflammation, which may facilitate individualized treatment in COPD. Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR1283.Respiratory research 01/2011; 12:11. · 3.36 Impact Factor -
Article: Exhaled air molecular profiling in relation to inflammatory subtype and activity in COPD.
N Fens, S B de Nijs, S Peters, T Dekker, H H Knobel, T J Vink, N P Willard, A H Zwinderman, F H Krouwels, H-G Janssen, R Lutter, P J Sterk[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Eosinophilic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is predictive for responses to inhaled steroids. We hypothesised that the inflammatory subtype in mild and moderate COPD can be assessed by exhaled breath metabolomics. Exhaled compounds were analysed using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and electronic nose (eNose) in 28 COPD patients (12/16 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage I/II, respectively). Differential cell counts, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were measured in induced sputum. Relationships between exhaled compounds, eNose breathprints and sputum inflammatory markers were analysed and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. Exhaled compounds were highly associated with sputum cell counts (eight compounds with eosinophils, 17 with neutrophils; p < 0.01). Only one compound (alkylated benzene) overlapped between eosinophilic and neutrophilic profiles. GC-MS and eNose breathprints were associated with markers of inflammatory activity in GOLD stage I (ECP: 19 compounds, p < 0.01; eNose breathprint r = 0.84, p = 0.002) (MPO: four compounds, p < 0.01; eNose r = 0.72, p = 0.008). ROC analysis for eNose showed high sensitivity and specificity for inflammatory activity in mild COPD (ECP: area under the curve (AUC) 1.00; MPO: AUC 0.96) but not for moderate COPD. Exhaled molecular profiles are closely associated with the type of inflammatory cell and their activation status in mild and moderate COPD. This suggests that breath analysis may be used for assessment and monitoring of airway inflammation in COPD.European Respiratory Journal 06/2011; 38(6):1301-9. · 5.89 Impact Factor -
Article: Three vs. 10 days of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid for type 1 acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised, double-blind study.
B M Roede, P Bresser, R El Moussaoui, F H Krouwels, B T J van den Berg, P M Hooghiemstra, C A J M de Borgie, P Speelman, P M M Bossuyt, J M Prins[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unknown. This study compared the outcome of treatment for 3 vs. 10 days with amoxycillin-clavulanic acid of hospitalised patients with AECOPD who had improved substantially after initial therapy for 3 days. Between November 2000 and December 2003, 56 patients with AECOPD were enrolled in the study. Unfortunately, because of the low inclusion rate, the trial was discontinued prematurely. Patients were treated with oral or intravenous amoxycillin-clavulanic acid. Patients who showed improvement after 72 h were randomised to receive oral amoxycillin-clavulanic acid 625 mg or placebo, four times daily for 7 days. The primary outcome measure of the study was clinical cure after 3 weeks and 3 months. Of 46 patients included in the final analysis, 21 were in the 3-day treatment group and 25 were in the 10-day treatment group. After 3 weeks, 16 (76%) of 21 patients in the 3-day treatment group were cured, compared with 20 (80%) of 25 in the 10-day treatment group (difference -3.8%; 95% CI -28 to 20). After 3 months, 13 (62%) of 21 patients were cured, compared with 14 (56%) of 25 (difference 5.9%; 95% CI -23 to 34). Microbiological success, symptom recovery, the use of corticosteroids, the duration of oxygen therapy and the length of hospital stay were comparable for both treatment groups. It was concluded that 3-day treatment with amoxycillin-clavulanic acid can be a safe and effective alternative to the standard 10-day treatment for hospitalised patients with AECOPD who have improved after initial therapy for 3 days.Clinical Microbiology and Infection 03/2007; 13(3):284-90. · 4.54 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: atsjournals.org
Article: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha in asthma.
Frans H KrouwelsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 03/2007; 175(3):288; author reply 288-9. · 11.08 Impact Factor