Skills (14)
-
4 Questions71 Followers
-
53 Questions1030 Followers
-
7 Questions681 Followers
-
393 Questions21149 Followers
-
120 Questions8282 Followers
-
111 Questions12214 Followers
-
234 Questions32168 Followers
-
169 Questions12248 Followers
-
243 Questions28496 Followers
Research experience
-
Jan 2010
Research: Universidad de Zaragoza
Universidad de ZaragozaSpain · Zaragoza -
Jan 2009–
Dec 2011Research: NanoTrap (MAT2008-01319/NAN)
Centros de Investigacion Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN) · Centros de Investigacion Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN)ZaragozaNanotechnology; Risk Analsys -
Jun 2008–
May 2010Research: NanoSost
Universidad de Zaragoza · IUI en Nanociencia de Aragón - INA · Universidad de ZaragozaNanostructured Films and Particles · ZaragozaNanotechnology; Risk Analysis; Nanoparticle Aerosol -
Jan 2006–
Dec 2007Research: Chubu University
Chubu UniversityJapan · Kasugai -
Dec 2003–
Mar 2005Research: Development of Bone-Bonding Materials
Japan Science and Technology AgencyBiomaterials -
Jan 1999–
Dec 2010Research: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · Facultad de FarmaciaSpain · Madrid
Education
-
May 2003–
Dec 2003Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Graduate School of Materials Science · Post-DoctoralJapan · Nara -
Oct 2001–
Mar 2003Kyoto University
Graduate School of Engineering · Post-DoctoralJapan · Kyoto -
Dec 1996–
Oct 2001Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Faculty of Pharmacy · PhDSpain · Madrid -
Sep 1991–
Jun 1996Universidad Complutense de Madrid
BSc (Chemistry)Spain · Madrid
Awards & achievements
-
Oct 2001Scholarship: Scholarship of the Japanese Ministry of Education (Monbukagaku-sho)
-
Jan 1997Scholarship: FPI Scholarship
Other
-
LanguagesSpanish; English; Japanese
-
Other InterestsReading, running and enjoying time together with my wife and daughter, Nat. Nanotech.; Nano Lett.; J. Am. Chem. Soc.; Angew. Chem.; Chem. Commun.
Questions and Answers (8) View all
-
Answer added in Nanotechnology177 Does anyone know of a physical method to obtain nanoparticles?By V. M. Lenart · State University of Ponta GrossaFrancisco Balas · University of ZaragozaAny aerosol pyrolysis procedure allows the synthesis of nanoparticles. Of course, you will need to prepare an aerosol of small drops of a precursor in... [more]Any aerosol pyrolysis procedure allows the synthesis of nanoparticles. Of course, you will need to prepare an aerosol of small drops of a precursor in liquid state, transport them through a heating element (usually a tubular furnace) for the pyrolysis and collect the nanoparticles using an adequate filtering device. Production rates and yields are usually large depending on the material and the heating conditions. Moreover, since aerosol drops are chemically homogeneous, the composition of synthesized nanoparticles is also homogeneous. Drawbacks (of course you'll find some) are commonly related to heterogeneities in nanoparticle sizes and shapes. Literature is plenty with materials synthesized using these methods, from inorganic oxides to metal nanoparticles. A good starting point would be the book of Kodas and Hampden-Smith (http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471246697.html)Following
-
Answer added in Controlled Drug Delivery26 In case of drug delivery study using porous material, how to differentiate the drug delivery is from the surface or from the pores?By Sanjay Thorat · Italian Institute of Technology (IIT)Francisco Balas · University of ZaragozaIt will depend on the pore size and pore volume of the material. If drug molecules are small enough to be retained in the pores and these pores accoun... [more]It will depend on the pore size and pore volume of the material. If drug molecules are small enough to be retained in the pores and these pores account for the main part of the total porosity of the material, you can almost consider that all drug molecules are adsorbed inside the pores and drug release behavior can be attributed to diffusion through a porous matrix (that would also depend on shape, morphology, chemical functionalities, etc). On the other hand, if pores are small compared to drug molecules (or even in the same size range) or the pore surface are just a reduced part of the total surface area, the drug delivery profiles can be interpreted as dissolution/dispersion phenomena of the desorbed drug molecules from the outer surface of the material. Usually in nearly-insoluble porous materials, the drug release can be interpreted as a blend of both desorption and diffusion kinetics. Usually, desorption goes very fast and happens in the initial stages of release, while porous diffusion is slower and takes longer. To avoid initial burst the best idea is carefully wash the loaded material with an adequate solvent, maybe 5ml of solvent per g of loaded material would suffice but you will better find the best way to do it.Following
-
Answer added in Nanotechnology10 Is there any procedure for functionalizing SiO2 nanoparticles with rhodamine isothiocyanate with sizes under 100 nm?By Francisco Balas · University of ZaragozaFrancisco Balas · University of ZaragozaThank you al for your answers. We did try using PEG as coating to prevent agglomeration during the synthesis but it seems that rhodamine might react w... [more]Thank you al for your answers. We did try using PEG as coating to prevent agglomeration during the synthesis but it seems that rhodamine might react with the polymer and give some non-nanoparticulate material (seen in TEM images). I will try the click chemistry routes and will tell you the results. Thanks once again.Following
-
Question asked in Nanotechnology10 Is there any procedure for functionalizing SiO2 nanoparticles with rhodamine isothiocyanate with sizes under 100 nm?We have had good results with FITC-functionalized SiO2 NPs using micro-emulsions, but rhodamine derivatives give large sizes (about 200 nm) and usuall... [more]We have had good results with FITC-functionalized SiO2 NPs using micro-emulsions, but rhodamine derivatives give large sizes (about 200 nm) and usually as agglomerates.By Francisco Balas · University of ZaragozaFollowing
-
Answer added in Thin Films and Nanotechnology7 Why does Krypton work better than N2 or Ar for BET surface area measurement of porous thin films?By Michael Riley · Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteFrancisco Balas · University of ZaragozaIn fact the low sublimation level of Kr at 77K is the reason why it is mainly used for low-k materials and thin films. Gas adsorption is based in the ... [more]In fact the low sublimation level of Kr at 77K is the reason why it is mainly used for low-k materials and thin films. Gas adsorption is based in the equilibrium between the adsorbed gas molecules and the non-adsorbed free gas molecules at the test temperature. The sensitivity of the method that you are using (BET, Langmuir isotherm or whatever) depends on the accuracy of your pressure gauge to distinguish the mass of adsorbed molecules. If your material has enough pore volume or the size of mesopores is large enough, the adsorption is favored and both N2 or Ar are good probe molecules for the surface area and porosity. When pore volume is reduced such as in thin films, the equilibrium is not easily reached and gases with low sublimation capacity are needed. On the other hand, you are right considering Kr as an expensive gas but you will not need a large amount of it. The isotherms can be recorded in liquid N2 or liguid Ar up to p/p* = 0.5 or even lower just to determine surface area. There are some methods in literature to determine also pore size mainly based in microscopic approaches, such as NLDFT or GCMC, but some previous information on the microstructure of sample and properties of the gas molecules are necessary.Following
Publications (44) View all
-
Article: Surface functionalization for tailoring the aggregation and magnetic behaviour of silica-coated iron oxide nanostructures.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We report here a detailed structural and magnetic study of different silica nanocapsules containing uniform and highly crystalline maghemite nanoparticles. The magnetic phase consists of 5 nm triethylene glycol (TREG)- or dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA)-coated maghemite particles. TREG-coated nanoparticles were synthesized by thermal decomposition. In a second step, TREG ligands were exchanged by DMSA. After the ligand exchange, the ζ potential of the particles changed from -10 to -40 mV, whereas the hydrodynamic size remained constant at around 15 nm. Particles coated by TREG and DMSA were encapsulated in silica following a sol-gel procedure. The encapsulation of TREG-coated nanoparticles led to large magnetic aggregates, which were embedded in coalesced silica structures. However, DMSA-coated nanoparticles led to small magnetic clusters inserted in silica spheres of around 100 nm. The final nanostructures can be described as the result of several competing factors at play. Magnetic measurements indicate that in the TREG-coated nanoparticles the interparticle magnetic interaction scenario has not dramatically changed after the silica encapsulation, whereas in the DMSA-coated nanoparticles, the magnetic interactions were screened due to the function of the silica template. Moreover, the analysis of the AC susceptibility suggests that our systems essentially behave as cluster spin glass systems.Nanotechnology 03/2012; 23(15):155603. · 3.98 Impact Factor -
Article: In vitro structural changes in porous HA/beta-TCP scaffolds in simulated body fluid.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Porous scaffolds of biphasic calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP)) have been fabricated and changes induced both in phase composition and porous architecture by immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF) under static and orbital stirring conditions have been studied. The starting porous scaffolds exhibit a low and randomized micro- and mesoporosity, an interconnected macroporosity centered at 100 and 0.6microm, a fractal connectivity of D=2.981 and total percent porosity of ca. 80%. After immersion for up to 60days the micro- and mesoporosity increase slightly, which could be attributed to dissolution of the beta-TCP phase confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. The effects of the change in the porous framework with SBF immersion time favor the bioactive behavior of the tested materials, inducing a nucleation and growth of a nanocrystalline apatite phase as the interconnected macroporosity centered at 0.6microm is reduced. The macroporosity centered at 100microm is still stable after 60days in SBF. Therefore, these biphasic calcium phosphate porous scaffolds combine bioactive behavior with the stability of interconnected macroporosity over large periods of soaking time in SBF under static and orbital stirring conditions.Acta biomaterialia 04/2009; 5(7):2738-51. · 3.98 Impact Factor -
Article: Functionalization of different polymers with sulfonic groups as a way to coat them with a biomimetic apatite layer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Covalent coupling of sulfonic group (-SO 3H) was attempted on different polymers to evaluate efficacy of this functional group in inducing nucleation of apatite in body environment, and thereupon to design a simple biomimetic process for preparing bonelike apatite-polymer composites. Substrates of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polycaprolactam (Nylon 6), high molecular weight polyethylene (HMWPE) and ethylene-vinyl alcohol co-polymer (EVOH) were subjected to sulfonation by being soaked in sulfuric acid (H2SO4) or chlorosulfonic acid (ClSO 3H) with different concentrations. In order to incorporate calcium ions, the sulfonated substrates were soaked in saturated solution of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2). The treated substrates were soaked in a simulated body fluid (SBF). Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, thin-film X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy showed that the sulfonation and subsequent Ca(OH)2 treatments allowed formation of -SO3H groups binding Ca2+ ions on the surface of HMWPE and EVOH, but not on PET and Nylon 6. The HMWPE and EVOH could thus form bonelike apatite layer on their surfaces in SBF within 7 d. These results indicate that the -SO3H groups are effective for inducing apatite nucleation, and thereby that surface sulfonation of polymers are effective pre-treatment method for preparing biomimetic apatite on their surfaces.Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine 11/2007; 18(10):1923-30. · 2.32 Impact Factor -
Article: Surface modification of organic polymers with bioactive titanium oxide without the aid of a silane-coupling agent.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH), and poly(epsilon-caprolactam) (Nylon 6) were successfully modified with a thin crystalline titanium oxide layer on their surfaces by a simple dipping into a titanium alkoxide solution and a subsequent soak in hot HCl solution, without the aid of a silane-coupling agent. The surface modified polymers formed a bone-like apatite layer in a simulated body fluid (SBF) within a period of 2 days. PE, PET, and Nylon 6 formed an apatite layer faster and had a higher adhesive strength to the apatite. Three-dimensional fabrics with open spaces in various sizes containing such surface modified polymer fibers are expected to be useful as bone substitutes, since they may be able to form apatite on their constituent fibers in the living body, and thus, integrate with living bone.Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine 07/2007; 18(6):1167-74. · 2.32 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Luis Esquivias
Article: Structural characterization of nanosized silica spheres
F. Balas, M. Rodriguez-Delgado, C. Otero-Arean, F. Conde, E. Matesanz, L. Esquivias, J. Ramirez-Castellanos, J. Gonzalez-Calbet, M. Vallet-RegiSolid State Sciences. 01/2007; 9(5):351-356.