Research experience
-
-
Jan 2008
Research: Lutheran Medical Center
Lutheran Medical CenterBrooklyn · USA
-
-
Mar 2010
Research: Patient Barriers to Bariatric Surgery
Ethicon Endo Surgery · BariatricsBariatric Surgery
Education
-
Sep 1991–
Jun 1997St. John's University
Clinical Psychology · Clinical PsychologyUSA · Jamaica -
Sep 1987–
Jun 1988University at Albany - SUNY
Psychology · B.AUSA · Stony Brook
Other
-
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish
-
Scientific MembershipsThe Obesity Society
-
Journal RefereesObesity Surgery, Bariatric Times
-
Other InterestsI enjoy caving, hiking, scuba diving and any other outdoor activity., Obesity Surgery, Obesity, International Journal of Obesity Surgery, Advisory Board Member at Bariatric Times
Questions and Answers (3) View all
-
Answer added in Psychotherapy27 Suggestions for improving therapy that is not going wellBy Jeremy Halstead · University of LeedsDavid Mahony · PsyBariJeremy, Chris Muran and Jeremy Saffron have conducted research and published extensively on this issue. They identified markers for what they call "t... [more]Jeremy, Chris Muran and Jeremy Saffron have conducted research and published extensively on this issue. They identified markers for what they call "therapeutic disruptions." These can be verbal or facial cues from the patient that indicate that something is amiss. They developed a protocol that involves discussing the disruption immediately with the patient. What you often find is that the therapist and patient are not on the same page and by addressing the issue, the patient is able to clarify what they feel is going on and the therapist can address it. What you usually discover is that the patient and therapist were working on a different set of assumptions. When you clarify this in session it often leads to a productive session. If you don't address it the patient often drops out. DavidFollowing
-
Answer added in Evolutionary Clinical Psychology23 DenialBy David Mahony · PsyBariDavid Mahony · PsyBariInteresting comments and certainly you guys are more knowledgeable in this area than I am. I've been thinking a lot about denial since it is so preval... [more]Interesting comments and certainly you guys are more knowledgeable in this area than I am. I've been thinking a lot about denial since it is so prevalent in the work I do and it appears, at least on the surface, to be very maladaptive. You would think that being unable to adjust your behavior, when the environment is telling you that the behavior is not effective, is not be a very good characteristic for survival. I've always been amazed at how adaptive we are as infants and children. An infant can be born into any culture/family/language/environmental setting and adjust to it perfectly. We can learn any language effortlessly and fit right in to any surrounding that we are born into. Then, once we hit a certain age it becomes more difficult to adjust if these surrounding change or if we move to new surroundings. For example, many people move to the US and never learn English and even those that do will always have an accent. I'm starting to think that its not just difficult to adjust to a new environments after a certain age but are minds may actually fight it. Its as if we are designed to adapt to one environment and once the mold is set the mind fights any attempts to change. Could it be more adaptive for your behaviors to persevere in spite of negative feedback? I could certainly see a lot of examples where this would be true. For example, when we pursue romantic relationships we are more successful if we ignore rejection. So, even though individuals that get into self destructive behaviors with eating, drinking and drugs can become unable to change these behaviors due to denial others who have more adaptive behaviors don't change them even when they go through periods were they are ineffective. Interesting stuff...Following
-
Question asked in Evolutionary Clinical Psychology23 DenialI work in bariatrics/obesity where there is a lot of denial. I was wondering if anyone had any theories regarding the evolutionary purpose of denial. ... [more]I work in bariatrics/obesity where there is a lot of denial. I was wondering if anyone had any theories regarding the evolutionary purpose of denial. It seems to serve no useful function since it prevents change by making us unaware of certain behaviors/attitudes, etc.By David Mahony · PsyBariFollowing
Publications (4) View all
-
Article: Assessing sexual abuse/attack histories with bariatric surgery patients.
David Mahony[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study assessed sexual abuse/attack histories in 573 [corrected] bariatric surgery patients using the PsyBari. The prevalence rates found were lower (15.5%, 19.3% of women, 5.2% of men) than other studies that used bariatric surgery patients but consistent with studies that used nonbariatric obese subjects. Furthermore, bariatric surgery patients who disclosed sexual abuse/attack were more likely to disclose physical abuse, psychological problems, psychological treatment, psychiatric medication, and psychiatric hospitalization. Among bariatric surgery patients who disclosed sexual abuse/attack, females were more likely to disclose suicidal ideation. A logistic regression found that for females, physical abuse and suicidal ideation reliably predicted abuse/attack status. For males, psychological problems, psychiatric medications, hospitalization, and suicidal ideation, reliably predicted abuse/attack status.Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 07/2010; 19(4):469-84. · 0.75 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: David Mahony
Article: Psychological assessments of bariatric surgery patients. Development, reliability, and exploratory factor analysis of the PsyBari.
David Mahony[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bariatric surgery patients are required to receive psychological clearance before they are eligible for surgery. In spite of this, there are no standard assessment practices or tests designed specifically for these evaluations. The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and construct validity of the PsyBari, a psychological test designed for bariatric surgery patients. The PsyBari was administered to 752 patients. Internal consistency reliability and exploratory factor analyses were conducted. Items with high percentages of missing data, low communalities, and low item loadings were identified and deleted. Cronbach's α = 0.930 (0.940 for males and 0.927 for females). Six factors were obtained for each gender: for females, awareness of eating habits, early life problems due to weight, dysphoric feelings about weight, weight-related impairment, surgical anxiety, and guilty feelings related to eating; for males, physical impairment with depression, awareness of eating habits, early life problems due to weight, interpersonal support with anxiety about weight, anger, and guilty feelings about eating habits. Results indicate that there are unique psychometric parameters when constructing tests for bariatric surgery patients. The PsyBari has good overall reliability, although two of the 11 subscales have poor reliability. Factor analyses revealed six factors for each gender. Some factors were common for both genders, some were unique for each gender, and some consisted of mixed constructs.Obesity Surgery 03/2010; 21(9):1395-406. · 3.29 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: David Mahony
Article: Standardizing Presurgical Psychological Evaluations with the PsyBari Psychological Test
D. Mahony[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article is a review of the PsyBari, a psychological test designed specifically for bariatric surgery candidates.Bariatric Times. 01/2010; 7:1. -
SourceAvailable from: David Mahony
Article: Psychological gender differences in bariatric surgery candidates.
David Mahony[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Over 177,000 bariatric surgeries were performed in 2006. Most patients are required to receive presurgical psychological clearance, although there are no empirically validated psycho-surgical risk factors. In an effort to establish normative data on suspected risk factors, the present study was conducted to determine if males and females differ on psycho-surgical risk factors. Subjects consisted of 361 consecutive bariatric surgery candidates undergoing a psychological evaluation in a private practice setting. They were administered the PsyBari, a test that detects and measures psycho-surgical risk factors, and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-2). The results indicate that males have significantly higher BMIs than females (p=0.035). Females have tried significantly more diets than males (p<0.000). Females are significantly more likely to report a history of depression than males (p<0.000). Females received significantly higher scores on the PsyBari Depression Index than males (p<0.000.). Females received significantly higher BDI-2 scores than males (p<0.001). Females are significantly more likely to report a history of anxiety than males (p=0.004). Females received significantly higher scores on the PsyBari Social Anxiety Index than males (p=0.038). The results indicate that males and females differ significantly on suspected psycho-surgical risk factors. Assessments of bariatric surgery candidates should recognize that males and females have different baselines for psycho-surgical risk factors. Further research on bariatric surgery candidates should report results separated by gender.Obesity Surgery 03/2008; 18(5):607-10. · 3.29 Impact Factor