Publications (63) View all
-
Article: Coronary Obstruction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate, through a systematic review of the published data, the main baseline characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes of patients suffering coronary obstruction as a complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Very few data exist on coronary obstruction after TAVI. METHODS: Studies published between 2002 and 2012, with regard to coronary obstruction as a complication of TAVI, were identified with a systematic electronic search. Only the studies reporting data on the main baseline and procedural characteristics, management of the complication, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 publications describing 24 patients were identified. Most (83%) patients were women, with a mean age of 83 ± 7 years and a mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score of 25.1 ± 12%. Mean left coronary artery (LCA) ostium height and aortic root width were 10.3 ± 1.6 mm and 27.8 ± 2.8 mm, respectively. Most patients (88%) had received a balloon-expandable valve, and coronary obstruction occurred more frequently in the LCA (88%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was attempted in 23 cases (95.8%) and was successful in all but 2 patients (91.3%). At 30-day follow-up, there were no cases of stent thrombosis or repeat revascularization, and the mortality rate was 8.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Reported cases of coronary obstruction after TAVI occurred more frequently in women, in patients receiving a balloon-expandable valve, and the LCA was the most commonly involved artery. Percutaneous coronary intervention was a feasible and successful treatment in most cases. Continuous efforts should be made to identify the factors associated with this life-threatening complication to implement the appropriate measures for its prevention.04/2013; · 1.07 Impact Factor -
Article: Prognostic value of exercise capacity as evaluated by the 6-minute walk test in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 02/2013; 61(8):897-8. · 14.16 Impact Factor -
Article: Comparison of Hemodynamic Performance of Self-Expandable CoreValve Versus Balloon-Expandable Edwards SAPIEN Aortic Valves Inserted by Catheter for Aortic Stenosis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expandable CoreValve (CV) and the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN (ES) bioprostheses has been widely used for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. However, a direct comparison of the hemodynamic results associated with these 2 prostheses is lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare the hemodynamic performance of both bioprostheses. A total of 41 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CV prosthesis were matched 1:1 for prosthesis size (26 mm), aortic annulus size, left ventricular ejection fraction, body surface area, and body mass index with patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the ES prosthesis. Doppler-echocardiographic data were prospectively collected before the intervention and at hospital discharge, and all examinations were sent to, and analyzed in, a central echocardiography core laboratory. The mean transprosthetic residual gradient was lower (p = 0.024) in the CV group (7.9 ± 3.1 mm Hg) than in the ES group (9.7 ± 3.8 mm Hg). The effective orifice area tended to be greater in the CV group (1.58 ± 0.31 cm(2) vs 1.49 ± 0.24 cm(2), p = 0.10). The incidence of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was, however, similar between the 2 groups (effective orifice area indexed to the body surface area ≤0.65 cm(2)/m(2); CV 9.8%, ES 9.8%, p = 1.0). The incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation was greater with the CV (grade 1 or more in 85.4%, grade 2 or more in 39%) than with the ES (grade 1 or more in 58.5%, grade 2 or more in 22%; p = 0.001). The number and extent of paravalvular leaks were greater in the CV group (p <0.01 for both comparisons). In conclusion, transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CV prosthesis was associated with a lower residual gradient but a greater rate of paravalvular aortic regurgitation compared to the ES prosthesis. The potential clinical consequences of the differences in hemodynamic performance between these transcatheter heart valves needs to be addressed in future studies.The American journal of cardiology 01/2013; · 3.58 Impact Factor -
Article: Clinical and prognostic implications of existing and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common co-morbidity among patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Only recently have the clinical outcomes of patients with chronic or new-onset AF after TAVI been reported. The absence of clinical trials focusing on this cohort of patients has resulted in the lack of evidence based clinical guidelines. We aim to review and discuss the current literature on AF in TAVI, its clinical implications and future perspectives.Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 12/2012; · 1.48 Impact Factor -
Article: Surgical site infections following transcatheter apical aortic valve implantation: incidence and management.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to examine the incidence and management of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients submitted to transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI). METHODS: From April 2007 to December 2011, 154 patients underwent TA-TAVI with an Edwards Sapien bioprosthesis (ES) at the Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ) as part of a multidisciplinary program to prospectively evaluate percutaneous aortic valve implantation. Patient demographics, perioperative variables, and postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective registry. RESULTS: Five (3.2%) patients in the cohort presented with an SSI during the study period. The infections were all hospital-acquired (HAI) and were considered as organ/space SSI's based on Center for Disease Control criteria (CDC). Within the first few weeks of the initial procedure, these patients presented with an abscess or chronic draining sinus in the left thoracotomy incision and were re-operated. The infection spread to the apex of the left ventricle in all cases where pledgeted mattress sutures could be seen during debridement. Patients received multiple antibiotic regimens without success until the wound was surgically debrided and covered with viable tissue. The greater omentum was used in three patients and the pectoralis major muscle in the other two. None of the patients died or had a recurrent infection. Three of the patients were infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis, one with Staphylococcus aureus, and one with Enterobacter cloacae. Patients with surgical site infections were significantly more obese with higher BMI (31.4+/-3.1 vs 26.2+/-4.4 p=0.0099) than the other patients in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: While TA-TAVI is a minimally invasive technique, SSIs, which are associated with obesity, remain a concern. Debridement and rib resection followed by wound coverage with the greater omentum and/or the pectoralis major muscle were used successfully in these patients.Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 11/2012; 7(1):122. · 1.19 Impact Factor
