Claudio Djissey Shikida |
|
Doctor in Economics
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais (IBMEC)
·
Department of Economics
|
Research experience
-
Teaching: Microeconomics.
-
Teaching: Econometrics
Other
-
Scientific MembershipsSouthern Economic Association
-
Journal RefereesEconomics and human biology, The Open Political Science Journal, Journal of Socio-Economics, International Studies Quarterly, Economia Aplicada, Análise Econômica, Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, Informe Gepec, Economia, Ensaio Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação
-
Other InterestsKaraoke, movies, sitcoms, books, beer, coffee., The Machinery of Freedom, História Monetária do Brasil.
Publications (16) View all
-
Article: Rational electoral cycles: evidence for the mineiros cities
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to test the hypothesis of rational electoral cycles in local elections of 2000 and 2004 in Minas Gerais. We use the theoretical model/empirical employed by Sakurai (2005) and originally proposed by Pettersson-Lidbom (2001). The results show that municipal expenditures are higher in election years and that there is evidence of electoral rational cycles in the 2000 elections, and in all elections of 2000 and 2004 for the voters of the left parties.Informe GEPEC. 01/2010; -
SourceAvailable from: Claudio Djissey Shikida
Article: Military Expenditures, External Threats and Economic Growth
Claudio Djissey Shikida, Ari Francisco de Araujo Junior, Cláudio D. Shikida[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Do military expenditures have impact on growth? Aizenman & Glick (2006) found that this impact is positive in countries with good governance, where the external threat is significant. Our article shows that their results suffer from three limitations: (i) they are not robust to the most recent main database used (ii) small changes in the time period of some variables change their results, and (iii) the authors' econometric specification is not adequate to their hypothesis. Using a 2SLS specification we reconfirm the authors'' hypothesis.Economics Bulletin. 10/2008; 15(16):1-7. -
SourceAvailable from: Claudio Djissey Shikida
Article: Growth and inequalities of height in Brazil (1939-1981)
Leonardo M Monasterio, Luiz Paulo Noguerol, Claudio Djissey Shikida[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This paper analyzes the heights of Brazilian people using anthropometric and economic data. The literature suggests that height is a good proxy of the material living conditions of different populations. Data indicate that the difference between the heights of 21 and 65-year-old men is approximately six centimetres. The same value, by coincidence, represents the difference in the stature of the poorest and richest quintiles. Adjusted data show an increase of 3.8 centimetres in the heights of adult male Brazilians born between 1939 and 1981. There are also stable regional differences; in the North and Northeast of the country, heights are about two centimetres lower than the national average for all groups. Regression analyses show that proxy variables related to living conditions during bodily growth, and using regional dummies, were statistically significant causes of the variation in the heights of individuals. In contrast, colour, urban/rural, and inequality variables were not significant. The results replicate what the historiography of the relation between living conditions and stature makes clear: the social environment has a significant impact on the average height of populations.07/2006; -
SourceAvailable from: Claudio Djissey Shikida
Article: SEIS CENTÍMETROS: UMA ANALÍSE ANTROPOMÉTRICA DA POF 2002- 2003
Luiz Paulo Nogueról, Cláudio D. Shikida, Leonardo M. Monasterio[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This paper analyzes the heights of the Brazilian people using anthropometric and economic data from the Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares (POF) 2002-2003. The literature suggests that height is a good proxy of the physical life conditions of the populations. The tabulations of POF microdata indicate that the difference among the heights of 21 and 65-year-old men is circa 6 centimeters. The same value, by chance, represents the difference on the stature of the poorest and richest quintiles. There are also steady regional differences; in the North and Northeast, the heights are about 2 centimeters lower than the national average, for any cohort. Regression analyses show that proxy variables related to life conditions during body growth and regional dummies were statistically significant causes of the variation on the height of individuals. In contrast, color, urban/rural and inequality variables were not significant. The results replicate what the historiography on life conditions and stature says: the social environment has a significant impact on the average height of the populations.02/2005; -
Article: Give me Security or I give you a "no": looking for the median voter in the Brazilian Guns' Referendum
Ari Francisco de Araujo Junior, Fábio Augusto Reis Gomes, Márcio Antônio Salvato, Cláudio Djissey ShikidaRevista Brasileira de Economia 02/2008; 61(4):429-448.