Catey Bunce |
|
BSc (Hons), MSc, DSc
|
|
Moorfields Eye Hospital
·
Research & Development
|
Publications (266) View all
-
Article: Reply: Cataract surgery and microphthalmic eyes.
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 05/2013; 39(5):818-9. · 2.75 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Donna S Mackay
Article: A Longitudinal Study of Stargardt Disease: Clinical and Electrophysiologic Assessment, Progression, and Genotype Correlations.
Kaoru Fujinami, Noemi Lois, Alice E Davidson, Donna S Mackay, Chris R Hogg, Edwin M Stone, Kazushige Tsunoda, Kazuo Tsubota, Catey Bunce, Anthony G Robson, Anthony T Moore, Andrew R Webster, Graham E Holder, Michel Michaelides[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic natural history of Stargardt disease and correlate with the genotype. DESIGN: Cohort study of 59 patients. METHODS: Clinical history, examination, and electrophysiologic assessment were undertaken in a longitudinal survey. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on electrophysiologic findings, as previously published: Group 1 had dysfunction confined to the macula; Group 2 had macular and generalized cone system dysfunction; and Group 3 had macular and both generalized cone and rod system dysfunction. At baseline, there were 27 patients in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, and 15 in Group 3. Amplitude reduction of >50% in the relevant electroretinogram (ERG) component or a peak time shift of >3 ms for the 30 Hz flicker ERG or bright flash a-wave was considered clinically significant ERG deterioration. Molecular screening of ABCA4 was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 31.7 years, with the mean follow-up interval being 10.5 years. A total of 22% of patients from Group 1 showed ERG group transition during follow-up, with 11% progressing to Group 2 and 11% to Group 3. Forty-seven percent of patients in Group 2 progressed to Group 3. There was clinically significant ERG deterioration in 54% of all subjects: 22% of Group 1, 65% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3. At least 1 disease-causing ABCA4 variant was identified in 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with initial rod ERG involvement demonstrated clinically significant electrophysiologic deterioration; only 20% of patients with normal full-field ERGs at baseline showed clinically significant progression. Such data assist counseling by providing more accurate prognostic information and are also highly relevant in the design, patient selection, and monitoring of potential therapeutic interventions.American journal of ophthalmology 03/2013; · 3.83 Impact Factor -
Article: Bringing together patient and specialists: the first Birdshot Day.
Nikolaos Koutroumanos, Annie Folkard, Rea Mattocks, Jenny Wright, Wen Xing, Claudia Wilson-Barrett, Karen Bonstein, Carlos Pavesio, Mark Westcott, Gemma Moore, Miles Stanford, Catey Bunce, Narciss Okhravi[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The importance of patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare decisions and research is increasingly recognised. This paper describes the aims, delivery, evaluation and impact of a 'Birdshot Day' organised for patients with birdshot uveitis, their carers and healthcare professionals. METHODS: Delivery of this event involved the close collaboration of patients with a large number of different healthcare professionals. The event's evaluation used established social research methods including qualitative questionnaires pre, post and 6 months following the event. The results were statistically analysed. RESULTS: Results indicated that this event significantly educated both patients and professionals. The sense of isolation felt by patients was reduced and networking was developed among all attendees. Patient priorities for research were recorded and invaluable insight into patients' needs for a better quality of life was gained. CONCLUSIONS: The first undertaking of this novel PPI event achieved all its aims. It became even clearer that fundamental questions remain about birdshot uveitis, including aetiology, pathogenesis, practical clinical issues and impact on quality of life. These questions can only be addressed in partnership with patients. To this end, patients and professionals came together under the banner 'Team Birdshot' and the National Birdshot Research Network was launched.The British journal of ophthalmology 03/2013; · 2.92 Impact Factor -
Article: Effectiveness of the community-based Low Vision Service Wales: a long-term outcome study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: AIMS: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the community-based Low Vision Service Wales (LVSW). METHODS: A long-term observational study of the Government-funded, community-based, low-vision rehabilitation service which operates in over 180 optometry practices in Wales. Participants were recruited from the LVSW (n=342; 246 women; median age 82 years) at baseline (before the Low Vision intervention). The primary outcome measure was change in visual disability as evaluated by the seven-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Change was measured on the same cohort at three separate time points, and comparisons were made between these: baseline-3 months; 3-18 months; baseline-18 months. Secondary outcome measures included: use of low-vision aids (LVAs) and satisfaction with the service provided. RESULTS: Questionnaires were sent to 281 participants (whose visual disability had been measured at baseline and 3 months) at 18 months postintervention. Responses were received from 190 (67.6%) people; 24 were deceased. Self-reported visual disability was significantly reduced (Wilcoxon Signed Rank (WSR) test: p<0.001) between baseline and 18 months by -0.28 logits (-1.24 to 0.52). This was less than that found between baseline and 3 months; -0.61 logits (-1.81 to 0.02). At 18 months, 79% patients used their LVAs at least once a week which was not significantly different to that found at 3 months (WSR: p=0.127). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the effect of the LVSW persists over a period of 18 months; disability is reduced from baseline, and use of LVAs remains high.The British journal of ophthalmology 02/2013; · 2.92 Impact Factor -
Article: A pilot study of intraocular use of intensive anti-inflammatory; triamcinolone acetonide to prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy in eyes undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for open globe trauma; the adjuncts in ocular trauma (AOT) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Eyes sustaining open globe trauma (OGT) is a group at high risk of severe visual impairment. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the commonest cause of retinal redetachment in these eyes and is reported to occur in up to 45% of cases. Intensive anti-inflammatory agents have been shown to be effective at modifying experimental PVR and to be well tolerated clinically.The Adjuncts in Ocular Trauma (AOT) Trial was designed to investigate the benefits of using intensive anti-inflammatory agents (intravitreal and sub-Tenon's triamcinolone, oral flurbiprofen and guttae prednisolone 1.0%) perioperatively in patients undergoing vitrectomy surgery following open globe trauma.Methods/design: Patients requiring posterior vitrectomy surgery following open globe trauma will be randomised to receive either standard treatment or study treatment. Both groups will receive the standard surgical treatment appropriate for their eye condition and routine perioperative treatment and care, differing only in the addition of supplementary adjunctive agents in the treatment group. The investigated primary outcome measure is anatomical success at 6 months in the absence of internal tamponade. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised controlled clinical trial to investigate the use of adjunctive intensive antiinflammatory agents in patients undergoing vitrectomy following open globe trauma. It will provide evidence for the role of these adjuncts in this group of patients, as well as provide data to power a definitive study.EudraCT No: 2007/005138/35.Trials 02/2013; 14(1):42. · 2.02 Impact Factor