Topics (9) View all

Research experience

  • Nov 1997–
    present
    Research: University of Bath
    University of Bath · UKOLN · UKOLN
    United Kingdom · Bath

Awards & achievements

  • Nov 2011
    Award: Runner-up in the IT Professional Blogger of the Year 2011 awards organised by Computer Weekly
  • Apr 2010
    Award: Best Communications Paper at W4A 2010
  • Dec 2007
    Award: Information World Review's Information Professional of the Year 2007
  • Sep 2005
    Award: Best Research Paper at ALT-C 2005

Other

  • Languages
    English
  • Journal Referees
    W4A conferences

Questions and Answers (1) View all

  • Answer added in Science Communication
    3 A better term for describing/indicating services such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley, and Zotero?
    By Wei Jeng · University of Pittsburgh
    Brian Kelly · University of Bath
    That's an interesting question. Such services could be used to provide a social networking environment for researchers ("Facebook for Researchers"); a... [more]

Publications (64) View all

  • Source
    Conference Proceeding: Open Metrics for Open Repositories
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasingly there is a need for quantitative evidence in order to help demonstrate the value of online services. Such evidence can also help to detect emerging patterns of usage and identify associated operational best practice. This paper seeks to initiate a discussion on approaches to metrics for institutional repositories by providing a high-level overview of the benefits of metrics for a variety of stakeholders. The paper outlines the potential benefits which can be gained from providing richer statistics related to the use of institutional repositories and also reviews related work in this area. The authors describe a JISC-funded project which harvested a large number of repositories in order to identify patterns of use of metadata attributes and summarise the key findings. The paper provides a case study which reviews plans to provide a richer set of statistics within one institutional repository as well as requirements from the researcher community. An example of how third-party aggregation services may provide metrics on behalf of the repository community is given. The authors conclude with a call for repository managers, developers and policy makers to be pro-active in providing open access to metrics for open repositories.
    Open Repositories 2012, Edinburgh, Scotland; 07/2012
  • Source
    Conference Proceeding: Open Content and Open Events: Professional Development in an Amplified World
    B Kelly
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Whilst the importance of open access to scholarly content is widely appreciated, difficulties in changing established practices and agreeing on new business models provide barriers to greater provision of open scholarly content. However content which is created by librarians and information professionals need not be affected by issues such as publisher agreements, business models for peer-reviewing, etc. There is therefore an opportunity for those involved in the provision of library services to be pro-active in allowing content developed within the organisation to be made freely available for reuse by others. Training and user support materials provide one area in which a willingness to share resources should provide benefits to those working in the public sector in particular, in light of the significant reductions in funding we are currently seeing. In addition to conventional text-based resources the widespread availability of mobile devices and the growing ubiquity of WiFi networks are making it possible to share access to live events or to record such events and make recordings freely available to others. This paper provides a summary of recent experiences in the provision of amplified events in order to maximise access to events and the ideas discussed at events. We are now starting to see such events move beyond experimentation by early adopters and the provision of an event amplification infrastructure becoming increasingly by professionals who are seeking ways of developing their professional skills beyond traditional physical attendance at events. The paper describes how the librarian's role in sharing access to knowledge and resources can develop into sharing knowledge and expertise with peers across the sector by being willing to be active content providers in amplified events.
    Online Information 2011, London, UK; 01/2011
  • Source
    Conference Proceeding: What's on the Technology Horizon?
    B Kelly
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We are continuing to see rapid technological developments taking place which will affect those working in the library sector. But unlike the technological developments we saw in the mid-1990s following the release of the Web and its acceptance as a transformative technology, we are now in the midst of significant political and funding changes which will affect the working practices of those working in the information profession. This paper describes recent work sponsored by the JISC Innovation Support Centres, UKOLN and CETIS, which produced a Technology Outlook for UK Tertiary Education 2011-2016 report on technology developments which are felt to have a time-to-adoption horizon of one year or less; two to three years or four to five years. The paper introduces the technologies mentioned in the report and invites discussion on the implications for those working in libraries and as information specialists.
    Internet Librarian International 2011, London, UK; 01/2011
  • Source
    Conference Proceeding: Web Accessibility Metrics For A Post Digital World
    B. Kelly, D. Sloan
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper argues that, as we move towards a 'post-digital' world where use of the Web becomes normalised, there is a need to address Web accessibility measurement challenges within a wider real-world context. Strategy and policy that defines Web accessibility purely by the conformance of digital resources with technical guidelines can lead to a danger that 'good enough' solutions may fail to be deployed; they also fail to consider a wider measure of user experience in accessibility measurement. We propose that metrics should draw on aspects of user experience to provide a more meaningful, real-world measure of the impact (or not) of accessibility barriers and therefore priority in addressing them. Metrics should also consider context in terms of the quality of effort taken by organisations to provide an inclusive experience; one option for doing so is the framework provided by British Standard 8878 Code of Practice for Web Accessibility. In both cases, challenges exist in the complexity of defining and implementing such metrics.
    W3C WAI RDWG Symposium on Website Accessibility Metrics, Online Symposium 5 December 2011.; 01/2011
  • Chapter: A deployment strategy for maximising the impact of institutional use of Web 2.0
    B. Kelly
    01/2010; , ISBN: 978-1843343479

Following (27) See all

Followers (56) See all