Topics (8)

Research experience

  • Jan 2012
    Research: Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
    Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
    Austria · Innsbruck

Publications (13) View all

  • Article: [Transarterial chemoembolisation in hepatocellular carcinoma.]
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common cause of cancer related death. The present review gives an overview on the loco-regional therapy performed by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).TACE combines two different therapeutic approaches. First, application of chemotherapeutic agents into tumor's feeding vessels and second, selectively de-arterialization by different particle embolization applicated during angiography. Different chemoembolization agents and techniques are described. The methode is save and less invasive. Side effects range from the postembolization syndrom with nausea, vomiting, fever and abdominal pain up to hepatic insufficiency, which is very rare.The aim of the therapy is control clinical symptoms, prolonge progression free survival, stabilize quality of life and survival. Further indications are bridging therapy prior liver transplantation and TACE is used as a neoadjuvant therapy.Thus, TACE plays a role in the therapy of HCC and indication should be tailored to the individual patient's condition by an interdisciplinary tumor board.
    Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 02/2013;
  • Article: [Radiological diagnosis of primary hepatic malignancy.]
    Benjamin Henninger, Johannes Petersen, Werner Jaschke
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Modern radiology offers countless opportunities both in the detection but also in the characterization of primary liver malignancies. Ultrasound remains usually the first exploratory overview study whereat using ultrasound contrast agent for a further characterization of liver lesions improves this technique considerably. Advanced cross-sectional imaging methods can, in most cases, already provide an exact diagnosis. Thus, the CT is already considered a standard technique for liver imaging and magnetic resonance imaging has gained in recent years due to liver-specific contrast agents and faster sequences a central role in liver imaging. The following article provides an overview of these various radiological procedures and describes the different primary liver malignancies and their imaging characteristics.
    Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 02/2013;
  • Article: Evaluation of liver fat in the presence of iron with MRI using T2* correction: a clinical approach.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with conventional chemical shift-based sequences with and without T2* correction for the evaluation of steatosis hepatitis (SH) in the presence of iron. METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent MRI and liver biopsy because of clinically suspected diffuse liver disease were retrospectively analysed. The signal intensity (SI) was calculated in co-localised regions of interest (ROIs) using conventional spoiled gradient-echo T1 FLASH in-phase and opposed-phase (IP/OP). T2* relaxation time was recorded in a fat-saturated multi-echo-gradient-echo sequence. The fat fraction (FF) was calculated with non-corrected and T2*-corrected SIs. Results were correlated with liver biopsy. RESULTS: There was significant difference (P < 0.001) between uncorrected and T2* corrected FF in patients with SH and concomitant hepatic iron overload (HIO). Using 5 % as a threshold resulted in eight false negative results with uncorrected FF whereas T2* corrected FF lead to true positive results in 5/8 patients. ROC analysis calculated three threshold values (8.97 %, 5.3 % and 3.92 %) for T2* corrected FF with accuracy 84 %, sensitivity 83-91 % and specificity 63-88 %. CONCLUSIONS: FF with T2* correction is accurate for the diagnosis of hepatic fat in the presence of HIO. Findings of our study suggest the use of IP/OP imaging in combination with T2* correction. KEY POINTS : • Magnetic resonance helps quantify both iron and fat content within the liver • T2* correction helps to predict the correct diagnosis of steatosis hepatitis • "Fat fraction" from T2*-corrected chemical shift-based sequences accurately quantifies hepatic fat • "Fat fraction" without T2* correction underestimates hepatic fat with iron overload.
    European Radiology 01/2013; · 3.22 Impact Factor
  • Article: [18F]choline positron emission tomography in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: influence of antiandrogen therapy - a preliminary study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our purpose was to evaluate whether antiandrogen therapy (AAT) influences [(18)F]choline PET results in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RPE). Through a retrospective study we evaluated two groups of patients, both with histologically proven carcinoma of the prostate, who had undergone RPE and a subsequent [(18)F]choline PET because of biochemical failure (<4 ng/dl). One group consisted of 13 patients under AAT at the time of the PET examination (age range, 55-80 years; median, 68). The other group who had not undergone AAT consisted of 22 patients (age range, 48-72 years; median, 67). Our results were correlated with follow-up information related to histopathology, changes in prostate-specific antigen levels, other imaging modalities and clinical examination. Mean follow-up was 27 months. In patients who had undergone AAT, [(18)F]choline PET was true positive in eight out of 10 patients. The overall sensitivity in this group was 80%. In two cases [(18)F]choline PET turned out to be false negative, missing local relapse. Of the patients treated only with RPE, 10 out of 20 turned out to be true positive, resulting in a sensitivity of 50%.In all, in four patients biochemical recurrence could not be correlated to pathological findings in any of the available modalities. The difference in sensitivity between patients with and without AAT was statistically not significant (P=0.235). In patients with biochemical recurrence during AAT after RPE, [(18)F]choline PET can yield true-positive findings, even at prostate-specific antigen values of less than 4 ng/dl, and is an accurate technique for the detection of recurrence.
    Nuclear Medicine Communications 06/2012; 33(8):889-94. · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: Evaluation of MR imaging with T1 and T2* mapping for the determination of hepatic iron overload.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate MRI using T1 and T2* mapping sequences in patients with suspected hepatic iron overload (HIO). Twenty-five consecutive patients with clinically suspected HIO were retrospectively studied. All underwent MRI and liver biopsy. For the quantification of liver T2* values we used a fat-saturated multi-echo gradient echo sequence with 12 echoes (TR = 200 ms, TE = 0.99 ms +  n × 1.41 ms, flip angle 20°). T1 values were obtained using a fast T1 mapping sequence based on an inversion recovery snapshot FLASH sequence. Parameter maps were analysed using regions of interest. ROC analysis calculated cut-off points at 10.07 ms and 15.47 ms for T2* in the determination of HIO with accuracy 88 %/88 %, sensitivity 84 %/89.5 % and specificity 100 %/83 %. MRI correctly classified 20 patients (80 %). All patients with HIO only had decreased T1 and T2* relaxation times. There was a significant difference in T1 between patients with HIO only and patients with HIO and steatohepatitis (P = 0.018). MRI-based T2* relaxation diagnoses HIO very accurately, even at low iron concentrations. Important additional information may be obtained by the combination of T1 and T2* mapping. It is a rapid, non-invasive, accurate and reproducible technique for validating the evidence of even low hepatic iron concentrations. • Hepatic iron overload causes fibrosis, cirrhosis and increases hepatocellular carcinoma risk. • MRI detects iron because of the field heterogeneity generated by haemosiderin. • T2* relaxation is very accurate in diagnosing hepatic iron overload. • Additional information may be obtained by T1 and T2* mapping.
    European Radiology 05/2012; 22(11):2478-86. · 3.22 Impact Factor

Following (24) See all

Followers (23) See all