Angela Pistorio |
|
M.D., PhD.
|
|
IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini
·
Scientif Direction - Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit
|
Other
-
LanguagesItaliano
English
Francais
Questions and Answers (3) View all
-
Question asked in Meta-Analysis5 In a meta-analysis for combining ORs, is it possible to obtain negative lower limits of the CI and if yes when does it happen?Question about meta-analysis.Question about meta-analysis.By Angela Pistorio · IRCCS Istituto G. GasliniFollowing
-
Answer added in Epidemiology and Public Health69 Can anyone recommend an ebook or paper which provides a guide on how to do meta analysis of epidemiological studies?By Swapnil Gadhave · University of PuneAngela Pistorio · IRCCS Istituto G. GasliniI would suggest to read these 2 following papers: 1) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate ... [more]I would suggest to read these 2 following papers: 1) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher. BMJ. 2009; 339: b2700. Published online 2009 July 21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 PMCID: PMC2714672 (attached below) 2: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman, The PRISMA Group. PLoS Med. 2009 July; 6(7): e1000097. Published online 2009 July 21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMCID: PMC2707599 I found also extremely helpful the 3-days Short Course at the University of Bristol by Prof. Johathan Sterne as it was very practical: "Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context" (see the web-site: http://www.bris.ac.uk/social-community-medicine/shortcourse/).Liberati_Bmj_2009_Prisma explanation elaboration.pdf ×Following
Publications (219) View all
-
Article: MRI versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
C Malattia, A Consolaro, S Pederzoli, A Madeo, A Pistorio, M Mazzoni, C Mattiuz, Gm Magnano, S Viola, A Buoncompagni, E Palmisani, R Hasija, N Ruperto, A Ravelli, A Martini[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To compare the American College of Rheumatology paediatric (ACRp) response criteria and conventional radiography with MRI findings in a cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (30 girls, 10 boys; median age 10.8 years) with arthritis of the wrist starting treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biological agents were recruited. At 1-year follow-up the treatment response was assessed by ACRp criteria and radiographic progression using the adapted Sharp/van der Heijde method. Wrist MRIs were evaluated using both the paediatric-MRI and the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI scores. Sensitivity to change of clinical and imaging variables was assessed by standardised response mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) was used to compare SRMs. RESULTS: ACRp90 responders showed a significantly higher decrease in MRI synovitis score (median change -4) than non-responders (median change 0), ACRp30-50 responders (median change 0) and ACRp70 responders (median change -1) (p=0.0006, Kruskal-Wallis test). Non-responders showed significantly higher radiographic progression than ACRp90 responders (pB=0.016). The MRI synovitis score showed a greater responsiveness to change (SRM 1.69) compared with the majority of ACR core set of variables. MRI erosion scores were less responsive than conventional radiography in detecting destructive changes (RE <1). MRI follow-up revealed no signs of inflammation in four out of 24 wrists with clinically inactive disease. CONCLUSION: Only ACRp90 responders showed a significant decrease in synovitis and the halting of structural damage, suggesting that levels of response higher than ACRp30 are more appropriate for assessing drug efficacy. The excellent responsiveness of MRI and its ability to detect subclinical synovitis make it a promising outcome measure.Annals of the rheumatic diseases 07/2012; · 8.11 Impact Factor -
Article: Final validation of a new composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)
A Consolaro, N Ruperto, A Bazso, S Magni-Manzoni, MA Pelagatti, A Pistorio, A Magnani, C Malattia, I D'Agostino, G Filocamo, A Martini, A RavelliPediatric Rheumatology 04/2012; 6:1-2. · 1.44 Impact Factor -
Article: 3.5 Comparison of functional ability in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, juvenile dermatomyositis, juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and healthy controls. An analysis of the PRINTO database
G Filocamo, S Meiorin, C Saad-Magalhães, A Pistorio, A Ravelli, E Cortis, D Mihaylova, M Alessio, O Arguedas, S Garay, A Martini, N Ruperto, for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTOPediatric Rheumatology 04/2012; 6:1-1. · 1.44 Impact Factor -
Article: Time of onset of iridocyclitis (IC) in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
S Verazza, M Allegra, B Lattanzi, S Dalprà, S Magni-Manzoni, A Pistorio, S Oliveira, E Castell, O Arguedas, A Martini, A RavelliPediatric Rheumatology 04/2012; 6:1-2. · 1.44 Impact Factor -
Article: Does incorporation of aids/devices and help, make a difference in the childhood health assessment questionnaire disability index? Analysis from the printo juvenile idiopathic arthritis database
C Saad-Magalhães, A Pistorio, A Ravelli, R Brik, D Mihaylova, R Ten Cate, B Andersson-Gare, V Ferriani, K Minden, P Hashkes, M Rygge, MJ Sauvain, H Venning, A Martini, Ruperto for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) NPediatric Rheumatology 04/2012; 6:1-1. · 1.44 Impact Factor