Skills (4)
Awards & achievements
-
Jul 2007Award: Outstanding Research Fellow, Cleveland Clinic
Other
-
Scientific MembershipsMember of the European Society of Coloproctology
Fellow Member of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America
Member of the Collaborative Group of Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer
Membro Honorário da Associação Brasileira de Colite Ulcerativa e Doença de Crohn
Member of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
Membro Titular da Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
Membro da Associação Latinoamericana de Coloproctologia
Publications (19) View all
-
Article: Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: the learning curve is for operative speed, not for quality.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We aimed to define the learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC). A retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data was performed. Consecutive segmental and total HALC performed by a single surgeon with no prior HALC experience was included. Operative time and quality-related outcomes, including conversions, operative and postoperative complications, length of stay, reoperations and readmissions were compared for consecutive cohorts of 25 HALC. A subgroup analysis of right, left, total and proctocolectomy performed in each cohort of 25 HALC was also performed. From December 2005 to February 2009, 200 HALC were performed. When evaluated in cohorts of 25 consecutive cases, operative times (155-206 min), operative complications (4-12%), postoperative complications (8-36%), length of stay (4-5 days), reoperations (0-8%) and readmissions (0-16%) were similar. In the subgroup analysis, there were no changes in the quality-related measures for any colectomy type or the operative time for right and proctocolectomy as experience was gained. Operative time decreased for left (183-127 min) and total HALC (259-218 min) after experience with 50 cases (P < 0.05). HALC operative times decreased with surgeon experience. For quality-related outcomes, there was no learning curve for HALC.Colorectal Disease 10/2010; 12(10 Online):e304-9. · 2.93 Impact Factor -
Article: Clinical outcomes of ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the fate of the rectum, functional results and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in ulcerative colitis. Patients with ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis who underwent IRA from 1971 to 2006 were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-two patients with an IRA were matched by age, sex and follow-up duration with 66 patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and compared for functional outcomes and quality of life. Eighty-six patients with an IRA were included. Median follow-up was 9 (range 1-36) years. Rectal dysplasia and cancer rates were 17 and 8 per cent respectively. The rectum was resected in 46 patients (53 per cent) because of refractory proctitis in 24, rectal dysplasia in 15 and rectal cancer in seven. The cumulative probability of having a functioning IRA at 10 and 20 years was 74 and 46 per cent respectively. Patients with an IRA had fewer bowel movements (P = 0.020) and less night-time seepage (P = 0.020) but increased urgency (P < 0.001) compared with patients with an IPAA, whereas quality of life was similar. In selected patients with ulcerative colitis IRA gives an acceptable quality of life and functional outcome that are comparable to those in patients with an IPAA. Owing to the risk of cancer, surveillance of the rectum is mandatory.British Journal of Surgery 01/2010; 97(1):65-9. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Wireless capsule endoscopy fragmentation in a patient with Crohn's disease.
Marcia Henriques de Magalhães Costa, Andre da Luz Moreira, Cyrla ZaltmanClinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 05/2011; 9(11):e116-7. · 5.64 Impact Factor -
Article: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The field of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is expanding. We compare short-term and early oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus open resection in carefully matched rectal cancer patients. All consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were reviewed. Laparoscopic resections were matched 1:1 to open resections by age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and type of surgery. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ninety-one rectal cancer patients with laparoscopic resection were included, 59% were male, and median age was 62 years. Conversion rate was 18.7%. Laparoscopic and open surgery had similar 30-day morbidity and mortality except wound infection, which was lower for the laparoscopic group (p = 0.02). Laparoscopic surgery had similar 30-day readmissions but shorter total length of hospital stay (5 versus 7 days, p < 0.01), time to first flatus (3 versus 4.5 days, p = 0.001), and time to first bowel movement (4 versus 5 days, p = 0.05) when compared with open surgery. The 3-year disease-free survival, local recurrence, and distant recurrence rates were also similar between the two groups. Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed for rectal cancer, with better postoperative recovery and acceptable early oncological outcomes. Results from large ongoing randomized trials with longer follow-up time are pending to better define oncologic outcomes.Surgical Endoscopy 01/2011; 25(1):278-83. · 4.01 Impact Factor -
Article: Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer decreases distant recurrence and could eradicate local recurrence.
Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato, Luca Stocchi, Andre da Luz Moreira, Daniel Geisler, David W Dietz, Ian C Lavery, Victor W Fazio, Matthew F Kalady[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of pathologic complete response (pCR) (i.e., T0N0M0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A single-center, prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database was queried for patients with primary cII and cIII rectal cancer staged by CT and ERUS/MRI undergoing long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by proctectomy with curative intent between 1997 and 2007. Patients were stratified into pCR and no-pCR groups and compared with respect to demographics, tumor and treatment characteristics, and oncologic outcomes. Outcomes evaluated were 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, disease-specific mortality, local recurrence, and distant recurrence. The query returned 238 patients (73% male), with a median age of 57 years and median follow-up of 54 months. Of these, 58 patients achieved pCR. Patients with pCR vs no-pCR were statistically comparable with respect to demographics, chemoradiation regimens, tumor distance from anal verge, clinical stage, surgical procedures performed, and follow-up time. No patient with pCR had local recurrence. Overall survival and distant recurrence were also significantly improved for patients achieving pCR. Achievement of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with greatly improved cancer outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. Future studies should evaluate the relationship between increases in pCR rates and improvements in cancer outcomes in this population.Annals of Surgical Oncology 01/2011; 18(6):1590-8. · 4.17 Impact Factor