Alessandro Sciahbasi |
|
MD
|
|
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Sanitaria Locale Roma B
·
Interventional Cardiology
|
Other
-
Scientific MembershipsEAPCI member
-
Journal RefereesAmerican heart journal, The American journal of cardiology, International journal of cardiology
Publications (54) View all
-
Article: The clinical spectrum of longitudinal deformation of coronary stents: from a mere angiographic finding to a severe complication.
Stefano Rigattieri, Alessandro Sciahbasi, Paolo Loschiavo[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Longitudinal deformation of coronary stents has been recently described and seems to be more frequent with certain contemporary stent platforms. Indeed, in order to increase flexibility and deliverability, stent manufacturers have reduced strut thickness and the number of connectors within cells; this could negatively affect other mechanical properties of the device, such as the resistance to longitudinal stress. Moreover, longitudinal deformation has been associated to adverse events, such as stent thrombosis. We report 3 cases of longitudinal stent deformation observed at our institution. The first case was a consequence of postdilatation of the stent with a non-compliant balloon, whereas the other 2 cases involved the treatment of bifurcation lesions. One case was complicated by acute, intraprocedural stent thrombosis; such a dreadful complication, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously reported. Although longitudinal stent deformation is an infrequent finding, usually not associated with adverse events, at least in the short term, it can sometimes turn into a catastrophic, life-threatening complication. The growing number of reports about this issue in recent years should prompt the operators to carefully select coronary stents, especially when dealing with certain lesion subsets, such as ostial lesions, bifurcations, and long lesions.The Journal of invasive cardiology 05/2013; 25(5):E101-5. · 1.84 Impact Factor -
Article: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: six-month outcomes from a single-center registry.
Stefano Rigattieri, Maria Cera, Alessandro Sciahbasi, Cristian Di Russo, Silvio Fedele, Giuseppe Ferraiuolo, Giuliano Altamura, Francesco Rocco Pugliese, Paolo Loschiavo[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little is known about the efficacy and medium-term outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very old patients. We evaluated in-hospital and 6-month outcomes in a retrospective cohort of nonagenarian patients presenting at our hospital with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated by primary PCI from January 2003 to May 2012. During this period, primary PCI was performed in 1598 consecutive patients; twenty-seven patients (age, 92.5 ± 2.5 years) were enrolled in the study. Four patients (15%) were in advanced Killip class at presentation. STEMI location was anterior in 44%. Patients received aspirin, 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose, and heparin. Abciximab was given to 41% of patients. Coronary angiography showed multivessel disease in 52% of patients. Pain-to-balloon and door-to-balloon times were 375.0 ± 410.2 minutes and 107.3 ± 47.6 minutes, respectively. Intra-aortic balloon pump was implanted in 1 patient. An average of 1.3 ± 0.7 stents (95% bare-metal stents) were implanted per patient. Procedural success rate, defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≥2 and residual stenosis <20%, was 89%. Hospital mortality was 18.5%. TIMI major bleeding and acute renal failure, defined as an absolute increase of 0.5 mg/dL serum creatinine, occurred in 7% and 22% of patients, respectively. Overall 6-month survival rate was 67%. Our data suggest that primary PCI can be performed in nonagenarian patients with high success rate and with an acceptable bleeding risk, even when aggressive antithrombotic drugs, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are given.The Journal of invasive cardiology 05/2013; 25(5):242-5. · 1.84 Impact Factor -
Article: Cardiac magnetic resonance detection of left ventricular thrombus in acute myocardial infarction.
Chiara Lanzillo, Mauro Di Roma, Alessandro Sciahbasi, Monia Minati, Luciano Maresca, Gianluca Pendenza, Enrico Romagnoli, Francesco Summaria, Roberto Patrizi, Marco Di Luozzo, Paolo Preziosi, Ernesto Lioy, Francesco Romeo[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction: Left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) is a possible complication of acute myocardial infarction. Aim of our study was to evaluate incidence and clinical characteristics of patients with LVT after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance (CMR).Methods and Results: In a prospective cohort of 36 consecutive patients with STEMI acutely reperfused with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, CMR was performed within one week. LVT was found in 7 patients (19%), and was located in left ventricle apex or adherent to antero-septum. Compared to the rest of population patients with LVT have lower ejection fraction (38 ± 7% versus 51 ± 6%, P = 0.009), larger left ventricle end systolic volume (95.8 ± 19 ml versus 68.9 ± 19 ml, P = 0.02), higher time to reperfusion (9.3 ± 7.2 versus 5 ± 3.6, P = 0.03) and left anterior descending artery was constantly involved (100% versus 41 %, P = 0.06). In 5 cases the LVT was also detected by echocardiography, however, in 2 cases it was missed. Conclusions: The incidence of LVT after STEMI is not negligible and was accurately detected by CMR. Localization of myocardial infarction, time to reperfusion, ejection fraction and left ventricle end systolic volume are the most important predictors of left ventricle thrombus formation.Acute Cardiac Care 03/2013; 15(1):11-6. -
Article: Closed versus open cell stent for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: The Closed versus Open Cells stent for High risk percutaneous coronary Interventions in ST-Elevation acute myocardial infarction (COCHISE) pilot study.
Alessandro Sciahbasi, Gianluca Pendenza, Luca Golino, Enrico Romagnoli, Giorgia Caferri, Roberto Patrizi, Francesco Summaria, Francesco Serra, Maria Benedetta Giannico, Emanuele Bruno, Luigi Sommariva, Ernesto Lioy[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Stent deployment may be associated with distal embolization and slow flow in coronary thrombotic lesions. There are no data on the risk of distal thrombus embolization according to the stent design. The aim was to evaluate coronary flow after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction according to the employed stent (closed versus open cell design). From March 2010 to December 2011, 223 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to primary PCI either with an open cell (112 patients, 88 men) or with a closed cell stent design (111 patients, 92 men). The primary endpoint was the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) after the procedure. There were no significant differences in procedural success nor in-stent deployment in the 2 groups. At baseline, there were no significant differences in cTFC between the 2 groups (70 ± 37 and 67 ± 39, P = .65, respectively). After the procedure, the open cell group showed significantly higher cTFC compared to the closed cell group (18 ± 11 and 15 ± 5, P = .003 respectively). This difference was associated with a significant lower rate of TIMI 3 flow (87% and 95%, P = .037) and myocardial blush grade 3 (65% and 87%, P = .001) in the open compared to the closed cell group. There were 2 cases of death in the open cell and 1 case in the closed cell group. The use of a closed cell stent design rather than an open cell during PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with better coronary angiographic flow after PCI.American heart journal 03/2013; 165(3):415-20. · 4.65 Impact Factor -
Article: Chronic aspirin and statin therapy in patients with impaired renal function and acute coronary syndromes: results from the IN-ACS Outcome Registry.
Alessandro Sciahbasi, Vittoria Rizzello, Lucio Gonzini, Simona Giampaoli, Cesare Greco, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Gian Francesco Mureddu, Antonio Di Chiara, Ernesto Lioy, Alessandro Boccanelli[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background: The cardioprotective role that statin and aspirin has appears to be reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This analysis aims to evaluate the impact of statin and aspirin on the outcome of patients with CKD and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Methods: All patients who were enrolled in the IN-ACS Outcome registry, diagnosed with CKD, were included in our analysis. We divided patients into four groups, according to previous chronic therapy: neither aspirin nor statin therapy (Group 1), aspirin only therapy (Group 2), statin only therapy (Group 3) and aspirin plus statin therapy (Group 4).Results: Of the 5483 patients enrolled that had data on glomerular filtration rate available, 1484 had CKD: These segregated into 589 patients in Group 1, 477 in Group 2, 89 in Group 3 and 329 in Group 4. Despite having a higher baseline risk profile, groups 3 and 4, as compared to the other two groups, exhibited a significantly lower in-hospital mortality (1% in Group 3, 2% in Group 4; but 8% in Group 1 and 7% in Group 2, p = 0.0007); while at 30 days it remained so, as it was 1% in Group 3, 4% in Group 4 (and 10% in Group 1 and 10% in Group 2 p = 0.0002); and at 1 year it was 11% in Group 3 and 13% in Group 4 (compared to 20% in Group 1 and 23% in Group 2, p = 0.0012).Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with CKD and ACS, chronic treatment with statin or the combination of aspirin and statin is associated with short-term and long-term better outcomes for in-hospital mortality, as compared to those receiving no therapy or aspirin therapy alone.European journal of preventive cardiology. 09/2012;