Particle size is a notation for the comparative dimension of solid particles. But when we are talking about the metal, the crystal contains the internal boundaries. Any of the enclosed part by these boundaries, called as grain and its size is called as a grain size. Generally inside the particle, we can get grains.
In case of single crystal, the whole crystal can be called as a single grain. Here it can be considered as a particle. In case of nonmetallrgist, particle size may be equal to grain size.
The word crystallite is used by physicist whereas the grain by metallurgist. The word particle is used by all the researchers and scientists, in general.If a material consists of only one crystallite or grain throughout the whole volume, then it should be a single crystal. Otherwise, it is polycrystalline.Particle always holds more than one crystallite or grain.One can use XRD with Rietveld analysis for finding the size. This measurement is in reciprocal space.TEM can be used for exact measurement directly. This is in real space.It is difficult to compare these results most of the time.
I agree with KM Towe. Here I would like to throw another "seemingly strange" answer. If you have a uniform powder consisting of ideal, identical single crystal spheres of iron 10 microns across. Then the crystallite size is the same as the physical size of the sphere. Now the measurements using XRD and electron microscopy should in principle give the same result, bu limitations connected to the correctness of the model used to calculate the crystallite size for example, instrumental uncertainties and possibly personal factors could lead to deviation of the measured value from the true value.
In the ideal case of having "the correct model" for calculating the size, a person interested in the magnetic properties of the system will not be satisfied by the above answers; such a person would like to know whether the system consists of an assembly of single "magnetic" domain particles (in the language of physicists). Thus, while the suggested ideal system of iron powder consists of single-crystal spheres which in principle could be measured by XRD or electron microscopy, it consists, on the other hand, of an assembly of multi-domain particles, where the magnetic domain size is certainly different from the outcome of the XRD and electron microscopy measurements.
Such shape factor is determinable through 3D XRD reciprocal space imaging and appropriate Fourier analyses. I'm keenly interested in this subject. How do we estimate the particle/grain/crystallite shape factors? Please post links.
A beautiful supporting evidence of your argument, Kenneth. Thanks for the nice illustrations
This is the size order
particle Size: It a measurement of a shape. We can measure the particle size in many different way: 1)Volume based particle size, 2)Weight based particle size, 3)Area based particle size, 4) Hydrodynamic or aerodynamic particle size. There is an International Standard on presenting various characteristic particle sizes.This set of various average sizes includes median size, geometric mean size, average size.Grain Size: grain size is the diameter of individual grains in the crystal of a material.
This is schematic of POLYCRYSTALLINE SOLIDs....
each grain is consists of crystallites at which are orientated in specific direction and each one of these grains are separated by grain boundaries.
The atomic order can vary from one domain to the next.
The grains are usually 100nm-100microns in diameter.
Polycrystals with grains less than100 nm in diameter, are nanocrystalline.
Sorry - according to the international definition, the nanocrystalline material should have at least one dimension smaller than 100 nm (not 10 nm!)
Thank you Dear Pawel
That was a wrong in my writing... :-)
DEAR kathirvel,,,how can particle or crystallite will be same? from sherrer crystallite size is in the order of nanometer and from SEM the grain size is in micrometer? then how is it possible?
The difference is between crystallite, grain, and particle ...
Crystallite size is the smallest - most likely single crystal in powder form. The crystallite size commonly determined by XRD.
Grain is either a single crystalline or polycrystalline material, and is present either in bulk or thin film form. During the processing, smaller crystallites come closer and grow to become larger due to kinetics. Therefore, in the most likely scenario, the grain is larger than a crystallite. And, the grain morphology is commonly determined by SEM (but not XRD).
Particle may be present as a single crystal or an agglomeration of several crystals. Therefore, particle is under no circumstances smaller than crystallite size. In the ultrafine nano regime, particle size and crystallite size may be the same. XRD and TEM are commonly employed to ensure that there is any difference between the crystallite size and particle size.
Regarding the size comparison between grains and particles, it is however difficult to say whether the grain is bigger or particle is bigger. Sometimes, particles are evolved from controlled agglomeration of small grains, and alternately grains may also be grown from smaller particles by annealing at a higher temperature.
This discussion was fruitful.
Prof. Jason's explanation as per I understand is incorrect/ seemingly reflects incomplete understanding while Prof Peter's clear/ correct and illuminating.
Thank you prof. Peter for a crystal clear explanation.
Thanks to all for sharing and discussing the crystallite particle and grain size which is most important characteristic in the field of nanotechnology
I think Jason Morales explain clearly. Crystalline size and crystallite size are different.
XRD analysis usually indicate each particle is an agglomerate composed of smaller crystallites (average crystallite size = X) or whether each particle is a single crystallite. so there is no difference between crystallite and grain size.
Peter Dier's rule "crystallite <= grain <= particle" is OK in practice as long as the material has been properly heat-treated and so is in a (near-)equilibrium state without any amorphous grains. With amorphous grains, which are not crystallites by definition, the situation becomes a little more complicated if these are non-negligible in size. You then may have glass inclusions in a polycrystalline matrix or a glassy film on top of a poly-crystal. The latter can happen if the thin film is rapidly cooled after deposition.
Cochin University of Science and Technology
Edward Joshua Tiloy Pialago
Chonbuk National University
Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology
Galgotias University, Gautam Buddha Nagar, U.P.
Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad
University of California, Santa Barbara
Università degli Studi di Siena
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Université de Moncton