Journal of anthropological sciences (J ANTHROPOL SCI)

Publisher: Istituto Italiano di Antropologia

Journal description

Current impact factor: 1.70

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2015
2009 Impact Factor 1.185

Additional details

5-year impact 1.33
Cited half-life 0.00
Immediacy index 0.08
Eigenfactor 0.00
Article influence 0.45
ISSN 1827-4765

Publisher details

Istituto Italiano di Antropologia

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • On author's personal website, institutional website and open access repositories, including arXiv and bio-arXiv
    • Author's pre-print and author's post-print must be removed once publisher version has been deposited
    • Publisher's version/PDF may be used
    • Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0
    • Published source must be acknowledged
    • Non-commercial
    • Must link to publisher version
    • Publisher last contacted on 02/12/2014
    • All titles are open access journals
  • Classification
    ​ green

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different categories of finds reveal how Neanderthals have manifested at different moments behaviors not ascribable to the utilitarian sphere, but to the aesthetic or symbolic. When the majority of this evidence dates to the few millennia that preceded the spread of Anatomically Modern Humans in Europe, these are grounds to continue the debate regarding the emergence of complex behavior, seen as an autonomous phenomenon of Neanderthal man or as the result of contact with immigrant populations. Re-examination of pebbles or flaked stones, a large part of such evidence, using a rigorous technological and taphonomic approach integrated with experimental tests, has already revealed these materials to be insignificant or natural, rather than anthropic, in origin. The following work seeks to shed light on the uncertainty existing around those stones and lithic artefacts bearing surface lines and scratches; these are of doubtful anthropic origin, but have not, as yet, been definitively interpreted. Generally, these findings are occasional in Mousterian sites, and when they are recovered with an excellent degree of preservation, different methods and levels of observation can be used for investigating them. The case studies taken into account are three sites in north Italy, where the surfaces of pebbles and flakes reveal a variety of signs and modifications attributable to various utilitarian acts. Of these, preventive cleaning of flint nodules has not been excluded, even if the traces on some tools reveal intentionality and repetition of gestures applied to the construction of a curated artifact.
    Journal of anthropological sciences 06/2014; 92:233-255. DOI:10.4436/JASS.92007
  • Journal of anthropological sciences 06/2014; 92:281-283. DOI:10.4436/JASS.92010
  • Journal of anthropological sciences 06/2014; 92:291-293. DOI:10.4436/JASS.92012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With most surname research undertaken within the fields of anthropology and population genetics, geographers have overlooked surnames as a credible data source. In addition to providing a review of recent developments in surname analysis, this paper highlights areas where geographers can make important contributions to advancing surname research, both in terms of its quality and also its applications. The review discusses the emerging applications for surname research, not least in the mining of online data, and ends by suggesting three future research themes to ensure the building momentum of surname research continues to grow across disciplines.
    Journal of anthropological sciences 06/2014; 92:99-117. DOI:10.4436/JASS.92004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present paper examined the assumption of strong reproductive isolation (RI) between Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens, as well as the question of what form it might have taken, using insights from the parallel case of chimpanzee–bonobo hybridization. RI from hybrid sterility or inviability was thought unlikely based on the short separation-to-introgression timeline. The forms of RI that typically develop in primates have relatively short timelines (especially for partial implementation); they generally preclude mating or influence hybrid survival and reproduction in certain contexts, and they have the potential to skew introgression directionality. These RI barriers are also consistent with some interpretations of the archaeological and fossil records, especially when behavioral, cognitive, morphological, and genetic differences between the two human species are taken into consideration. Differences potentially influencing patterns of survival and reproduction include interspecies violence, Neandertal xenophobia, provisioning behavior, and ontogenetic, morphological, and behavioral differences affecting matters such as kin and mate recognition, infanticide, and sexual selection. These factors may have skewed the occurrence of interbreeding or the survival and reproduction of hybrids in a way that might at least partially explain the pattern of introgression.
    Journal of anthropological sciences 01/2013; 91:91-110.
  • Journal of anthropological sciences 01/2010; 88:231-50.
  • Journal of anthropological sciences 01/2010; 88:9-10.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For a human population geneticist, an interest in Africa hardly requires an explanation. With the highest time depth of human history and over 2000 linguistic groups spreading across highly diverse geographical settings, Africa harbors a tremendous variety of genetic patterns that remain to be explained. My own interest in African populations started with São Tomé, a tiny plantation island located at the heart of the Gulf of Guinea that was peopled by slaves imported from the adjacent areas of the mainland. Presently, I am still interested in insular populations related to the slave trade, like the Cape Verde Archipelago, facing Senegal. Moreover, I became involved in the study of genetic diversity of continental areas like Angola and Mozambique, lying at the southwestern and southeastern edges of the Bantu expansions, respectively. The area of Angola, in particular, is especially interesting for understanding the push of Bantu-speaking peoples out of the rain forest into the arid steppes of southwestern Africa. In southern Angola, the cultural and geographical proximity between Bantu and Khoisan cattle herders poses intriguing questions about the development of the relatively isolated Southwest African pastoral scene and the nature of the interactions between the vanguard of the Bantu expansions and the non-Bantu peoples from the desert.
    Journal of anthropological sciences 01/2010; 88:5-8.