The European journal of general practice (Eur J Gen Pract)

Publisher: Informa Healthcare

Journal description

Created in 1995, the European Journal of General Practice is the official journal of WONCA Europe (the European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine) and supports its aims and objectives. The EJGP is an international scientific journal. Its objectives are: To foster scientific research in general practice/family medicine (GP/FM) by the publication of original papers and reports; To present background papers, and papers stimulating discussion and debate relevant for the development of GP/FM; To facilitate the communication between the members of the ESGP/FM, the international network organisations and the national colleges and societies involved in general practice.

Current impact factor: 0.81

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2015
2013 / 2014 Impact Factor 0.81
2012 Impact Factor 0.741
2011 Impact Factor 1.13

Impact factor over time

Impact factor
Year

Additional details

5-year impact 0.00
Cited half-life 0.00
Immediacy index 0.00
Eigenfactor 0.00
Article influence 0.00
Website European Journal of General Practice, The website
ISSN 1751-1402
OCLC 162283978
Material type Internet resource
Document type Internet Resource, Computer File, Journal / Magazine / Newspaper

Publisher details

Informa Healthcare

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author cannot archive a post-print version
  • Restrictions
    • 12 months embargo
  • Conditions
    • On author's personal website or institution website
    • Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged
    • On a non-profit server
    • Must link to publisher version
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • NIH funded authors may post articles to PubMed Central for release 12 months after publication
    • Wellcome Trust authors may deposit in Europe PMC after 6 months
  • Classification
    ​ yellow

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: After the health reform in 2003, a need emerged to monitor patient satisfaction in Turkey. To evaluate patient satisfaction with family practice in Turkey and compare with some other European countries. The study was performed on a countrywide representative sample from all the 81 provinces of Turkey. Data were collected during the years 2010-2012 from patients visiting family practice centres. A three-year repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using the EUROPEP instrument. Twenty-six questions with a five-point Likert scale were applied. Primary outcome measures of the study were the mean EUROPEP scores (min. 1, max. 5). Mean (± SD) EUROPEP scores for the years 2010 (n = 34 472), 2011 (n = 34 764), and 2012 (n = 32 667) were 4.09 ± 0.77, 4.29 ± 0.59, and 4.42 ± 0.54 respectively (F = 1565.37; P < 0.001). The mean satisfaction percentage was calculated as 88.3%. Areas of lowest satisfaction were 'Being able to speak to the GP on the telephone,' 'Getting through to the practice on the phone,' and 'Physical conditions of the family practice.' Although in small increments, patient satisfaction with family practices in Turkey has increased during the last few years.
    The European journal of general practice 07/2015; DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1048681
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of cardiovascular risk factor control in the development of heart failure (HF) has not yet been clearly established. To determine the effect of cardiovascular risk factor control on the occurrence of a first episode of hospital admission for HF. A case-control study using propensity score-matching was carried out to analyse the occurrence of first hospital admission for HF taking into account the degree of cardiovascular risk factor control over the previous 24 months. All patients admitted to the cardiology unit of the Hospital del Mar between 2008 and 2011 because of a first episode of HF were considered cases. Controls were selected from the population in the hospital catchment area who were using primary care services. Cardiovascular risk factor measurements in the primary healthcare electronic medical records prior to the first HF episode were analysed. After the matching process, 645 participants were analysed (129 HF cases and 516 controls). Patients suffering a first HF episode had modest increments in body mass index and blood pressure levels during the previous two years. Adjusted odds ratio for experiencing a first HF hospital admission episode according to systolic blood pressure levels and body mass index was (OR: 1.031, 95% CI: 1.001-1.04), and (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), respectively. Increased levels of body mass index and systolic blood pressure during the previous 24 months may determine a higher risk of having a first HF hospital admission episode.
    The European journal of general practice 07/2015; DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1049154
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is increasing interest among specialists in the complications after abdominal surgery due to adhesions. Exploration of experiences, attitudes and expectations of general practitioners concerning bowel obstruction and postoperative abdominal adhesions. In October 2012 a postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 800 Dutch GPs. The response rate was 45%, 24% (n = 190) filled out the questionnaire completely, 12% (n = 99) had no experience with the subject and 7% (n = 57) had no time to respond. A history of abdominal surgery does play a part in more than 80% of GP's differential diagnosis of abdominal complaints. Seventy-five per cent consider some types of surgery to induce more adhesions. Eighty-five per cent ponder the differentiation between adhesion related complaints and IBS as clear, however difficult (78%) in specific patients. Intestinal transit problems likely due to adhesions are treated with extra fluid (n = 64), more fibres (n = 85) and laxatives (n = 153). Referral to a specialist for adhesiolysis is rarely considered (11%). Forty per cent of the GPs would refer a patient with abdominal pain and suspected adhesions. Seventy-six per cent denote knowledge gaps and low experience in the treatment of intestinal transit problems. Some (n = 23) indicate the need for information about adhesions and obstruction through CME papers. Respondents are well equipped to deal with abdominal complaints and intestinal transit problems due to postoperative adhesions. Some indicate the need for information about adhesions and prevention of obstruction through CME papers.
    The European journal of general practice 07/2015; DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1055466
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: General practitioners (GPs) and patients can have different ideas about the causes of fatigue, which may hinder management of fatigue. To investigate the causal attributions of patients and their GPs for fatigue, their level of agreement, and the association between patients' attributions, and fatigue characteristics and other illness perceptions. Baseline data, collected between 2004 and 2006, of a prospective cohort study among 642 adult patients presenting to Dutch primary care practices (n = 147) with a main symptom of fatigue, were used. Patient causal attributions and illness perceptions were measured using the revised illness perception questionnaire (fatigue version). GP causal attributions were measured with an open question included in the form that was completed at the end of the patient's visit. Fatigue severity was measured using the checklist individual strength. Psychosocial causes were among the most often reported causal attributions by both patients and GPs. In 33% of 519 cases, the GP had no idea about the cause whereas the patient did. Overall, the agreement between the first reported causal attribution of patients and GPs was low. Qualitative differences in the labelling of causes were also found. Type of attribution (physical vs psychosocial/psychological) was associated with duration of fatigue (40 vs 25 months), and personal control (score 17.4 vs. 18.9). Most patients and GPs had ideas about the causes of fatigue, but differences were found in the first reported causes and the labelling of causes. The findings may provide leads for optimizing communication about fatigue.
    The European journal of general practice 07/2015; DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1055556
  • The European journal of general practice 06/2015; 21(2). DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1037270
  • The European journal of general practice 03/2015; 21(1):3. DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.1003541
  • The European journal of general practice 03/2015; 21(1):1-2. DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.1003540
  • The European journal of general practice 03/2015; 21(1):4. DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.1003542
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Previous studies reported moderate to good agreement between patients' self-reported diseases and physicians' registered diseases. Disagreement might hamper a good doctor-patient relationship and hamper good quality of care. Disagreement can be associated with demographic and psychosocial patient characteristics. Objectives: To evaluate the level of agreement on reported chronic diseases between patients and their general practitioners (GPs); to assess whether disagreement relates to patient characteristics. Methods: This study is embedded in a large GP based prospective cohort. Questionnaires of 2893 patients reporting on 14 chronic diseases are used. The agreement (percentage) between self-reported chronic diseases and the medical records was assessed first by descriptive statistics. To control for agreement by chance alone Cohen's kappa value was calculated. Type of (dis) agreement was further evaluated and associated with patient characteristics. Results: Despite high agreement on diseases between patients and GPs, kappa's varied from 0.17 (inflammatory joint diseases and rheumatoid arthritis) to 0.86 (diabetes mellitus). Most often under-reporting and over-reporting was related to a decreased physical and mental quality of life and higher age. Conclusion: kappa values between patients and GPs appeared to be low in this study.
    The European journal of general practice 05/2014; 21(1):1-7. DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.907266
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Guideline and reimbursement modifications have been introduced to optimize prescribing of antisecretory medication in Danish general practice. Impacts of the interventions have not been evaluated. Objectives: To analyse developments in prescribing of antisecretory medication in Denmark 2001-2011 and to assess the impacts of interventions on prescribing of antisecretory medication. Methods: Register-based cohort study covering the entire Danish population of currently 5.5 million inhabitants. Developments in the prescribing of antisecretory medication over time in Denmark between 2001 and 2011 and association with age and gender of users along with the impact of interventions on the prescribing of drug subgroups are analysed. Results: 96.8% of all antisecretory drugs sold are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and 94.4% of the PPIs are prescribed in primary care. Prescribing of PPIs has increased substantially during the past decade. Both number of users and the average individual use have increased. The prescribing of ulcerogenic drugs to the elderly has stagnated in the same time range. Reimbursement modifications and scientific guidelines do not seem to have had a substantial influence on the steadily increasing prescribing of PPIs. Conclusion: Use of PPIs has increased substantially during the past decade, without a change in indications for use of PPIs in the same time range. Interventions to enhance adherence to guidelines and promote rational use of PPIs do not seem to have had a substantial influence on the overall prescribing rate.
    The European journal of general practice 04/2014; 20(4). DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.905535
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Translations of questionnaires need to be carefully validated to assure that the translation measures the same construct(s) as the original questionnaire. The four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ) is a Dutch self-report questionnaire measuring distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. Objective: To evaluate the equivalence of the English version of the 4DSQ. Methods: 4DSQ data of English and Dutch speaking general practice attendees were analysed and compared. The English speaking group consisted of 205 attendees, aged 18-64 years, in general practice, in Canada whereas the Dutch group consisted of 302 general practice attendees in the Netherlands. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel method and ordinal logistic regression. Differential test functioning (DTF; i.e., the scale impact of DIF) was evaluated using linear regression analysis. Results: DIF was detected in 2/16 distress items, 2/6 depression items, 2/12 anxiety items, and 1/16 somatization items. With respect to mean scale scores, the impact of DIF on the scale level was negligible for all scales. On the anxiety scale DIF caused the English speaking patients with moderate to severe anxiety to score about one point lower than Dutch patients with the same anxiety level. Conclusion: The English 4DSQ measures the same constructs like the original Dutch 4DSQ. The distress, depression and somatization scales can employ the same cut-off points as the corresponding Dutch scales. However, cut-off points of the English 4DSQ anxiety scale should be lowered by one point to retain the same meaning as the Dutch anxiety cut-off points.
    The European journal of general practice 04/2014; 20(4). DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.905826
  • The European journal of general practice 04/2014; 20(2). DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.907782
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Recent systematic reviews have established that brief interventions in primary care are effective and economic at promoting physical activity. Lack of training has previously been identified as a barrier to lifestyle counselling in Ireland. Objectives: This study evaluates frequency of exercise counselling (EC), in patients with six chronic illnesses (type 2 diabetes mellitus, stable coronary heart disease, hypertension, depression, obesity, osteoarthritis) and healthy adults, by general practitioners (GPs) in the mid-west of Ireland, as well as, whether training in EC influences the frequency of EC. Methods: A questionnaire survey of GPs based in the mid-west of Ireland was conducted during February and March 2012. The questionnaire was distributed to 39 GPs at two continuing medical education meetings and posted to 120 other GPs in the area. The questionnaire assessed the frequency of EC, use of written advice and frequency of recommending resistance exercise in the above patient groups. It also assessed training in EC. Results: 64% of GPs responded (n = 102). Frequency of EC varied among the chronic illnesses evaluated. Use of written advice and advice on resistance exercise in EC was low. Only 17% of GPs had previous training in EC. If available, 94% of GPs would use guidelines to prescribe exercise in chronic illness. The association of previous training in EC with frequency of EC was variable, with significantly higher counselling rates found in T2DM, obesity and healthy adults. Conclusion: Improved training of GPs and development of guidelines may increase the frequency of EC in Ireland.
    The European journal of general practice 04/2014; 20(4). DOI:10.3109/13814788.2014.900534