Clinical Oncology Journal Impact Factor & Information

Publisher: Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain), WB Saunders

Journal description

Clinical Oncology is: a well established journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients reflecting the current multi-disciplinary approach to therapy: a journal of the Royal College of Radiologists

Current impact factor: 2.83

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2015
2013 / 2014 Impact Factor 2.826
2012 Impact Factor 2.858
2011 Impact Factor 2.072
2010 Impact Factor 2.294
2009 Impact Factor 2.846
2008 Impact Factor 2.184
2007 Impact Factor 1.561
2006 Impact Factor 1.471
2005 Impact Factor 1.288
2004 Impact Factor 0.91
2003 Impact Factor 0.923
2002 Impact Factor 0.771
2001 Impact Factor 0.804

Impact factor over time

Impact factor
Year

Additional details

5-year impact 2.64
Cited half-life 5.60
Immediacy index 0.98
Eigenfactor 0.01
Article influence 0.89
Website Clinical Oncology website
Other titles Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain): Online)
ISSN 1433-2981
OCLC 50820375
Material type Document, Periodical, Internet resource
Document type Internet Resource, Computer File, Journal / Magazine / Newspaper

Publisher details

WB Saunders

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • Pre-print allowed on any website or open access repository
    • Voluntary deposit by author of authors post-print allowed on institutions open scholarly website including Institutional Repository, without embargo, where there is not a policy or mandate
    • Deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate only allowed where separate agreement between repository and the publisher exists.
    • Permitted deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate, may be required to comply with embargo periods of 12 months to 48 months .
    • Set statement to accompany deposit
    • Published source must be acknowledged
    • Must link to journal home page or articles' DOI
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • Articles in some journals can be made Open Access on payment of additional charge
    • NIH Authors articles will be submitted to PubMed Central after 12 months
    • Authors who are required to deposit in subject-based repositories may also use Sponsorship Option
    • 'WB Saunders' is an imprint of 'Elsevier'
  • Classification
    ​ green

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radiotherapy is an essential component of treatment for more than half of newly diagnosed cancer patients. The response to radiotherapy varies widely between individuals and although advances in technology have allowed the adaptation of radiotherapy fields to tumour anatomy, it is still not possible to tailor radiotherapy based on tumour biology. A biomarker of intrinsic radiosensitivity would be extremely valuable for individual dosing, aiding decision making between radical treatment options and avoiding toxicity of neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy in those unlikely to benefit. This systematic review summarises the current evidence for biomarkers under investigation as predictors of radiotherapy benefit. Only 10 biomarkers were identified as having been evaluated for their radiotherapy-specific predictive value in over 100 patients in a clinical setting, highlighting that despite a rich literature there were few high-quality studies for inclusion. The most extensively studied radiotherapy predictive biomarkers were the radiosensitivity index and MRE11; however, neither has been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. Although these biomarkers show promise, there is not enough evidence to justify their use in routine practice. Further validation is needed before biomarkers can fulfil their potential and predict treatment outcomes for large numbers of patients. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.002
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BRCA1/2 mutation carriers show reduced apoptotic response to ionising radiation leading to recent debate about the safety of wide local excision and radiotherapy. The aim of the current study was to determine if BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer undergoing wide local excision and radiotherapy show increased ipsilateral and contralateral breast tumour recurrence and reduced survival compared with unilateral mastectomy. Following a detailed literature search, the methodology, populations, biases and outcomes of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence, contralateral breast tumour recurrence and survival were evaluated for 25 articles. No differences in outcomes were found between wide local excision and mastectomy. BRCA1/2 mutation status was predictive of contralateral breast cancer only. Radiotherapy reduces the risk of ipsilateral recurrence and confers no increase in contralateral recurrence. BRCA1/2 mutation status does not preclude treatment with wide local excision and radiotherapy. Given the retrospective studies with inherent flaws and small patient numbers, further large prospective trials are required. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.001
  • Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.004
  • Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.007
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Systemic therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the standard of care. The time of treatment administration has not been examined in the metastatic setting. A 'watch and wait' approach for the initiation of chemotherapy is sometimes used in clinical practice, either because of patient preference, presumed indolent disease behaviour, upfront radiotherapy or other interventions. We propose to evaluate the effect of a watch and wait approach on systemic treatment deliverability and patients' outcomes in a population-based study. A retrospective analysis of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients referred to medical oncology at the British Columbia Cancer Agency in 2009 was conducted. We defined the following: immediate chemotherapy (ICT) - chemotherapy ≤8 weeks from medical oncology consult; watch and wait chemotherapy (WWC) - initial observation with chemotherapy > 8 weeks from medical oncology consultation; watch and wait missed (WWM) - watch and wait patients who did not receive chemotherapy; best supportive care (BSC) - patients deemed chemotherapy ineligible. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier analysis, Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modelling. In total, 744 patients were seen by medical oncology; 355 (48%) received ICT, 173 (23%) watch and wait and 216 (29%) BSC. Of the 173 patients on a watch and wait approach, 42% missed an opportunity for chemotherapy due to poor performance status (50%), death (49%) and comorbidity (1%). The median overall survival was as follows: watch and wait 11.5 months, ICT 12.8 months and BSC 4.3 months (P < 0.0001). Controlling for confounding factors (age, gender, performance status), overall survival was longer in WWC (hazard ratio 0.73, confidence interval 0.81-1.07, P = 0.023) and lower in WWM (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.27-2.22, P < 0.0001), compared with ICT. A significant proportion of watch and wait patients never receive systemic therapy, predominantly due to a decline in performance status. Patients in the ICT group were younger, had a better performance status and had non-squamous histology compared with the watch and wait group. The overall survival was longer in the patients who received ICT versus watch and wait. The watch and wait strategy is associated with a high risk of missing the opportunity for any chemotherapy and should be judiciously implemented only in carefully selected patients. Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.009
  • Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To analyse our 5 and 10 year prostate brachytherapy outcome data and to assess the impact of PSA nadir on relapse free survival and whether an alternative definition of PSA relapse could detect men destined to fail by the Phoenix definition at an earlier time point. 474 men were treated over a 10 year period between 20012 and 2011and divided into 2 five year cohorts for the purpose of the analysis. The risk of relapse is strongly predicted by post treat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir. After 3 years post-treatment, PSA nadir plus 0.4 ng/ml identified men at risk of relapse 17 months earlier than the Phoenix definition. The Phoenix definition of nadir plus 2.0 ng/ml does not allow the early identification of men destined to relapse. The initiation of salavage therapy at the earliest opportunity could potentially affect subsequent survival and an outline randomised controlled trial proposal is presented. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.003
  • Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the UK. The quality of curative-intent radiotherapy is associated with better outcomes. National quality standards from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on patient work-up and treatment selection were used, with guidance from the Royal College of Radiologists on the technical delivery of radiotherapy, to assess the quality of curative-intent non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy and to describe current UK practice. Radiotherapy departments completed one questionnaire for each patient started on curative-intent radiotherapy for 8 weeks in 2013. Eighty-two per cent of centres returned a total of 317 proformas. Patient selection with positron emission tomography/computed tomography, performance status and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was usually undertaken. Fifty-six per cent had pathological confirmation of mediastinal lymph nodes and 22% staging brain scans; 20% were treated with concurrent chemoradiation, 12% with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) and 8% with Continuous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART). Sixty-three per cent of patients received 55 Gy/20 fractions. Although respiratory compensation was routinely undertaken, only 33% used four-dimensional computed tomography. Seventy per cent of patients were verified with cone beam computed tomography. There was consistency of practice in dosimetric constraints for organs at risk and follow-up. This audit has described current UK practice. The latest recommendations for patient selection with pathological confirmation of mediastinal lymph nodes, brain staging and respiratory function testing are not universally followed. Although there is evidence of increasing use of newer techniques such as four-dimensional computed tomography and cone beam image-guided radiotherapy, there is still variability in access. Efforts should be made to improve access to modern technologies and quality assurance of radiotherapy plans. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.006
  • Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.008
  • Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.005
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a rise in the number of women living with the long-term consequences of cancer and continuing to suffer unmet need as breast cancer survival improves. This paper includes an introduction to self-management and a discussion of the evidence around the effectiveness of the key intervention types that could help patients to help themselves after treatment. Self-management interventions are particularly beneficial in reducing bother from symptoms, without patients having to take on the additional burden of more unwanted side-effects frequently seen with pharmacological interventions. There is a need to prioritise the funding of these financially viable self-management strategies to ensure equity of access and that these interventions are available for those in need. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Clinical Oncology 06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.002
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inflammatory bowel disease has traditionally been considered a relative contraindication for radiotherapy due to a perceived increased risk of disease exacerbation and bowel toxicity. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current literature regarding rates of radiotherapy-induced acute and late bowel toxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and to compare these data with those of patients without the disease. An Ovid Medline search was conducted to identify original articles pertaining to the review question. Using the PRISMA convention a total of 442 articles screened, resulting 8 articles which were suitable for inclusion in the review. In general, the grading of toxicity was scored using either the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scoring systems. It was found that acute bowel toxicity of ≥ grade 3 occurred in 20% of patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and in 7% of patients receiving brachytherapy. Late bowel toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 15% of EBRT patients and in 5% of patients receiving brachytherapy. Brachytherapy was shown to have similar rates of toxicity and EBRT produced a moderate increase in both acute and late toxicity when compared with individuals without inflammatory bowel disease. In view of these results, we suggest that brachytherapy should be considered as a suitable treatment option for treating pelvic malignancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, whereas EBRT should be used with caution. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.001
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare skin tumour with a poor outcome and high rates of both local and distant recurrence despite radical management. We review the management of local and locoregional disease, and the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging. This overview aims to highlight some of the controversies regarding the current treatment of this disease, which seems to be on the increase. Data are conflicting as to whether there is any survival benefit from adjuvant primary site or regional nodal irradiation, partly due to the lack of prospective clinical trials. We also review the evolving role of primary radiotherapy and suggest areas where ongoing research is urgently required. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.04.007
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the efficacy of pulse dose rate (PDR) interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the penis and to compare with historical data of low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. We reviewed the clinical records of 27 consecutive patients treated in our institution with exclusive PDR brachytherapy for a squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. The median tumour greatest diameter was 20 mm (range: 10-50 mm). Twenty-three patients (85%) had tumours limited to the glans and/or prepuce and four patients (15%) also had inguinal lymph node metastases. Implantations were carried out according to the Paris system and treatments were delivered with PDR brachytherapy. The median brachytherapy dose was 60 Gy (range: 60-70 Gy). The median treated volume was 28 cm(3) (range: 8-62 cm(3)). The median reference isodose rate was 0.4 Gy/pulse/h (range: 0.4-0.5 Gy/pulse/h). The median number of pulses was 150 (range: 120-175 pulses). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range: 6-64 months), tumour relapses in the penis were reported in four patients (15%). All patients with only local relapse (n = 3) were successfully salvaged with partial amputation. The estimated overall survival rate at 3 years was 95% (95% confidence interval: 83-100%). No grade 3 or more acute reaction was observed. Delayed ulcerations and stenoses requiring at least one meatal dilatation were reported in two (9%) and five (22%) patients without local relapse. The treated volume was significantly correlated to the risk of clinically relevant delayed toxicity. The efficacy/toxicity results of PDR brachytherapy for the treatment of penile carcinoma are comparable with those obtained with LDR brachytherapy in historical cohorts. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 05/2015; 27(7). DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases has been reported in patients with HER2-positive tumours receiving trastuzumab therapy for metastatic breast cancer. This study tested whether prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) could reduce the incidence of CNS metastases in this setting. This was a prospective, randomised phase III trial. Patients were randomised 1:1 to no PCI or PCI delivered at around 6 weeks after study entry. Cognitive function was assessed prospectively. In total, 51 patients were randomised over a 3 year period; 25 received PCI and 26 did not. The cumulative incidence of CNS metastases at 2 years was 32.4% (standard error = 9.8%) on the no PCI arm and 21.0% (standard error = 8.6%) on the PCI arm; the associated hazard ratio was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.18-1.74; P = 0.32). There was no evidence of cognitive dysfunction in PCI patients. Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Oncology 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2015.04.033