Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics Journal Impact Factor & Information
Current impact factor: 0.58
Impact Factor Rankings
|2015 Impact Factor ||Available summer 2015 |
|2013 / 2014 Impact Factor ||0.582 |
|2012 Impact Factor ||0.712 |
|2011 Impact Factor ||0.491 |
|2010 Impact Factor ||0.862 |
|2008 Impact Factor ||1.026 |
|2007 Impact Factor ||1.026 |
|2006 Impact Factor ||0.426 |
|2005 Impact Factor ||0.462 |
|2004 Impact Factor ||0.574 |
|2003 Impact Factor ||0.349 |
|2002 Impact Factor ||0.886 |
|2001 Impact Factor ||1.188 |
Impact factor over time
|5-year impact ||0.88 |
|Cited half-life ||8.10 |
|Immediacy index ||0.13 |
|Eigenfactor ||0.00 |
|Article influence ||0.43 |
|Other titles ||Advances in imaging and electron physics, Imaging and electron physics |
|ISSN ||1076-5670 |
|OCLC ||30535280 |
|Document type ||Journal / Magazine / Newspaper |
- Author can archive a pre-print version
- Author can archive a post-print version
- Pre-print allowed on any website or open access repository
- Voluntary deposit by author of authors post-print allowed on authors' personal website, arXiv.org or institutions open scholarly website including Institutional Repository, without embargo, where there is not a policy or mandate
- Deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate only allowed where separate agreement between repository and the publisher exists.
- Permitted deposit due to Funding Body, Institutional and Governmental policy or mandate, may be required to comply with embargo periods of 12 months to 48 months .
- Set statement to accompany deposit
- Published source must be acknowledged
- Must link to journal home page or articles' DOI
- Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
- Articles in some journals can be made Open Access on payment of additional charge
- NIH Authors articles will be submitted to PubMed Central after 12 months
- Publisher last contacted on 18/10/2013
Publications in this journal
01/2014: pages 1-34;
01/2014: pages 1-37;
Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 01/2014; 181:125-208. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-800091-5.00003-3
01/2014: pages 39-99;
Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 01/2014; 186:VII-VII.
Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 01/2013; 179:XI-XIII.
Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 01/2013; 175:113-144. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-407670-9.00002-0
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The present paper deals with image segmentation, which constitutes a crucial step in image processing. In fact, the initial grey levels number is generally too large to permit the analysis in good conditions of the considered image and it is necessary to define regions (segments) whose pixels possess some properties in common, in terms of homogeneity, entropy, texture… The segmentation quality is also linked to the pertinence of boundaries separating regions (high level of contrast for example).
To address this segmentation goal, a lot of methods exist, generally depending on the choice of some arbitrary tools like metrics, similarity or homogeneity parameters and sometimes on an a priori knowledge concerning the desired number of classes.
We have decided to locate our study in the LIP (Logarithmic Image Processing) framework because of this Model compatibility with the Human Visual System.
First we propose LIP versions of classical algorithms like multi-thresholding, k-means and region growing (Part 2 and Part 3). For this last technique, we present a “systolic” approach. A special highlight is given on Hierarchical classifications (Part 4), because they suppress some subjective initial hypotheses concerning for example:
- the moment where a region becomes inhomogeneous and must be divided
- what is the number of significant classes present in the studied image
In fact, such methods have the advantage of producing on one hand all the possible segmentations and on the other hand a “cost” function based on an ultra-metric concept which permits to decide what are the most pertinent levels of classification.
This 4th part of the paper ends with a novel “Gravitational Clustering” algorithm starting from the universal attraction law of Newton.
Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 01/2013; 177:1-44.
01/2013: pages 145-199;
01/2013: pages 1-136;
01/2013: pages 1-111;
Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Edited by P. W. Hawkes, 01/2013: pages 283-307; Academic Press: Elsevier Inc..
1 01/2013: pages 137-202; , ISBN: 9780124077003
01/2013: pages 201-219;
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.