Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN )

Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

Description

Topics Covered: Gynecologic oncology and pathology; Maternal-fetal medicine and prenatal diagnosis; Prenatal diagnosis; Fertility; Reproductive endocrinology; Endoscopic surgery; Adult and pediatric gynecology; Urogynecology; General Obstetrics.

  • Impact factor
    2.64
    Hide impact factor history
     
    Impact factor
  • 5-year impact
    2.51
  • Cited half-life
    5.50
  • Immediacy index
    0.35
  • Eigenfactor
    0.01
  • Article influence
    0.84
  • Website
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology website
  • Other titles
    Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, Current opinion in obstetrics and gynecology
  • ISSN
    1040-872X
  • OCLC
    18553569
  • Material type
    Periodical, Internet resource
  • Document type
    Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author cannot archive a post-print version
  • Restrictions
    • 12 months embargo
  • Conditions
    • Some journals have separate policies, please check with each journal directly
    • Pre-print must be removed upon acceptance for publication
    • Post-print may be deposited in personal website or institutional repository
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • Must include statement that it is not the final published version
    • Published source must be acknowledged with full citation
    • Set statement to accompany deposit
    • Must link to publisher version
    • NIH authors will have their accepted manuscripts transmitted to PubMed Central on their behalf after a 12 months embargo (see policy for details)
    • Wellcome Trust and HHMI authors will have their accepted manuscripts transmitted to PubMed Central on their behalf after a 6 months embargo (see policy for details)
    • If the hybrid open access option is not available, RCUK authors articles will be released as Creative Commons Attirbution Non-Commercial No Derivatives after a 6 months
    • Publisher last reviewed on 10/04/2014
  • Classification
    ​ yellow

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To provide an overview of the care of the adolescent transgender patient with regard to the guidelines and recommendations that currently exist, and to review the role of the clinician caring for transgender youth.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review recent, significant contributions to the medical literature regarding the identification of factors which are associated with urinary, fecal, and double incontinence in women.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction are recognized as being equally important as traditional objective measures of success following midurethral sling (MUS) procedures. The objective of this article is to review the success after MUSs in the context of patient satisfaction.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2014;
  • Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 06/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To provide an update on the outcomes and complications of laparoscopic (or robot-assisted) sacrocervicopexy with and without supracervical hysterectomy, and highlight the differences with sacrocolpopexy technique based on the most recent evidence.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 06/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Review of recent data from clinical trials and descriptions of endometrial morphology with administration of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs).
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 06/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review the preoperative preparation, intraoperative equipment and techniques to facilitate hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 06/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An abstract is unavailable. This article is available as HTML full text and PDF.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 01/2009; 21(1):1-3.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To present the options and the results in the management of poor responders in in-vitro fertilization. There is no controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol which is best suited for all poor responders. Low dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist regimes appear to be most advantageous. Prediction of compromised response prior to cycle initiation by a thorough assessment of ovarian reserve as well as a careful review of past responses could allow for a more appropriate selection of a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol for each individual patient. Optimistic data have been presented by the use of high doses of gonadotropins, flare up gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols (standard or microdose), stop protocols, luteal onset of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, and short protocols. Natural cycle also seems to be an appropriate strategy to be considered. There is no universal definition for the 'poor responder'. Numerous strategies have been proposed to improve ovarian stimulation in poor responders, but none of them is the ideal for all such patients. More data from good quality controlled trials are needed.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):374-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: By the current review we aim to describe different options for laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer and discuss the reported risk factors and limitations of laparoscopic hysterectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Laparoscopic techniques and equipment have matured over the last 15 years and are now widely used to treat patients with endometrial cancer, thereby potentially reducing perioperative morbidity and postoperative pain, and providing shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and improved quality of life compared with the corresponding open procedures. However, some risk factors are postulated to limit the use of laparoscopic hysterectomy in staging of endometrial cancer. Surgical staging of endometrial cancer by laparoscopic hysterectomy is feasible and well tolerated. This surgical approach does not seem to affect recurrence and overall survival rates. Limitations of laparoscopic hysterectomy in management of endometrial cancer need to be evaluated.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):337-44.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the practice of 'bioidentical hormone therapy', it is our belief that pharmacists are compounding bioidentical hormone therapy with the best intentions. These pharmacists are, however, ill informed regarding the lack of scientific underpinning associated with the efficacy and safety of the practice of bioidentical hormone therapy. It is the purpose of this review to systematically examine the scientific rigor of the arguments posed by the proponents of bioidentical hormone therapy, and to differentiate the practice of bioidentical hormone therapy from the legitimate practice of pharmacy compounding. Most medical organizations have in essence refuted the bioidentical hormone therapy claims as unsubstantiated. The profession of pharmacy needs to address this issue in an authoritarian, scientific way, outside of the compounding issue. Bioidentical or natural hormones are expected to have similar efficacy and safety profiles as the commercially available hormonal therapies that have been studied in clinical trials, regardless of whether the active principle hormones are compounded by individual pharmacies or manufactured by large companies. Estriol is a weak estrogen that is not Food and Drug Administration approved for use as a prescription drug in the United States; thus, clinical trials are necessary to demonstrate the efficacy and safety profile for estriol. Further, supplementary clinical trials are necessary to determine whether there are efficacy or safety differences between natural progesterone and synthetic progestin, as studies to date are inconclusive.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):400-7.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two hundred and fifty thousand gynaecological laparoscopies are performed yearly in the UK, many of them diagnostic. Unless a patient has major endometriosis and needs advanced surgery, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists suggest a 'see and treat' policy. Thus, gynaecologists who undertake laparoscopy should be competent at performing intermediate level laparoscopic surgery, including excision of endometriosis, adhesions and benign ovarian tumours, rather than converting to laparotomy or referring patients to another unit. In order to reduce operative risk and make best use of resources, preoperative assessment should triage patients into those with unlikely pelvic pathology who do not require laparoscopy in the first instance, those with severe endometriosis, who need referral to a specialist centre and the intermediate group who is best served with a 'see and treat' policy. Appraisal of alternatives to diagnostic laparoscopy in infertility assessment and recent reports of modified ultrasound scanning improve the predictive value and will help to avoid unnecessary laparoscopies. Preoperative predictors for severe endometriosis can determine who needs specialist referral. 'See and treat' laparoscopies require adequate education, and workable training methods are under investigation. Negative laparoscopies should be avoided and 'see and treat' laparoscopy should replace diagnostic procedures. Thorough preoperative assessment helps to identify women suitable for 'see and treat' laparoscopy.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):325-30.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review operative procedures, specific risks, complications and evaluation of efficacy of Essure tubal sterilization performed simultaneously with endometrial ablation. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding is a significant health problem in premenopausal women. Endometrial ablation is an effective therapeutic option for the management of menorrhagia and an alternative to hysterectomy. Most women undergoing endometrial ablation are of reproductive age, and, because pregnancy after endometrial ablation could be complicated, many of these women require permanent birth control. Since the introduction of Essure tubal sterilization, this permanent contraception method has been widely used and offers an hysteroscopic approach similar to endometrial ablation techniques. Combining these two procedures offers the advantage of performing the two procedures simultaneously, but inherent rules and technical procedures must be followed to avoid any kind of injury such as heat conduction, material injuries, specific complications and specific follow-up. The combination of safety and efficacy of endometrial ablation and hysteroscopic sterilization makes a compelling argument for their concomitant use.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):359-63.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review current available literature on the relationship between fibroids and infertility with particular emphasis on the benefits of myomectomy. Pregnancy complications related to the presence of these lesions and to their removal are also addressed. There is a biological plausibility supporting a causal relationship between fibroids and infertility. From a clinical point of view, this association is mostly supported by studies comparing pregnancy rate following IVF in women with and without fibroids. The emerging view is that submucosal, intramural and subserosal fibroids interfere with fertility in decreasing order of importance. There is one randomized controlled trial supporting the benefits of myomectomy in infertile women with fibroids. The beneficial effects of surgery are further supported by insights from clinical series showing that the pregnancy rate following myomectomy is satisfactory and by the strong benefits documented in the few nonrandomized comparative studies. An increased rate of obstetric complications has been reported in women carrying fibroids. Data regarding the course of pregnancy in operated women are scanty. The most significant (although rare) complication is rupture of the uterus during pregnancy or labour. At present, owing to the lack of adequately designed trials aimed to clearly establish that lesions benefit from surgery, a comprehensive and personalized approach should be adopted. The most important variables to be considered are the age of the woman, the characteristics of the fibroids, the concomitant presence of fibroids-related symptoms and the presence of other causes of infertility.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):379-85.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multifetal pregnancies have skyrocketed over the past two decades as a consequence of infertility treatments. Multifetal pregnancy reduction has lowered the complications considerably. Here, we review the historical and current literature to determine reasonable statistics upon which to counsel patients Several papers in the past year have updated the database of outcomes, shown that prenatal diagnosis by fluorescent in-situ hybridization prior to reduction improves outcomes and examined the psychological and emotion frame through which patients view the circumstances and options available to them. Multifetal pregnancy reduction in experienced hands continues to dramatically improve the outcome of multiple pregnancies. The development of coping strategies for patients to deal with complex options and risks challenging their religious and other core beliefs now allows us to better counsel patients.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):386-93.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolutionary changes that have taken place in the area of electrosurgery. The distinct differences between devices along with disadvantages and ways of minimizing hazards will be analyzed. Since the first surgical application of electricity in the 1880s, the use of radiofrequency current in surgery has grown. Although monopolar and bipolar energy form the backbone of electrosurgery, various modifications have been made to both the electrosurgical generators and the hand instruments. Much of the driving force behind these modifications has been the goal of minimizing possible complications while improving surgical efficiency. Recently, the ability to obtain vessel sealing has dramatically impacted clinical practice in open, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery. Current evidence demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of electrosurgical devices in gynecologic surgery. Technology has evolved to allow vessel sealing capability through various instruments. Critical to the successful use of these advanced electrosurgical devices is a thorough understanding of their individual differences and nuances in order to obtain the desired tissue effects. Further studies are needed to determine the most appropriate applications and surgical procedures for these devices.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):353-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recently, various types of tension free vaginal tapes via retropubic and transobturator route (inside-out technique; outside-in technique) have been adopted for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The aim of this review is to assess the recent evidence on effectiveness and complications of these tapes in stress urinary incontinence. There was no significant difference found between tension free vaginal tapes and colposuspension for the cure of stress urinary incontinence at 5 years in a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Vault and posterior vaginal wall prolapse were commoner after colposuspension. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported that subjective cure for inside-out technique (five randomized controlled trials) and outside-in technique (six randomized controlled trials) at 2-12 months was no better when compared with tension free vaginal tapes (odds ratio: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.21). Bladder injuries (odds ratio: 0.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.33) and voiding difficulties (odds ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.98) were less common, whereas groin/thigh pain (odds ratio: 8.28; 95% confidence interval: 2.7-25.4) and vaginal injuries or mesh erosion (odds ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.87-4.39) were more common in transobturator tapes. Sexual function was overall improved; the pain being more with outside-in technique than inside-out technique route. The tension free tapes are effective in treating stress urinary incontinence; evidence for superiority of transobturator over retropubic tapes is currently limited.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):331-6.