American journal of mental retardation: AJMR (AM J MENT RETARD)

Publisher: American Association on Mental Retardation; American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Journal description

The American Journal on Mental Retardation (AJMR) is among the top two journals in the special education and rehabilitation fields according to the latest industry impact factor rankings. The AJMR reports current and critical research in biological, behavioral, and educational sciences. It is a singular, multidisciplinary resource in the causes, treatment, and prevention of mental retardation. The premier journal in its field for more than 100 years, the journal is an essential reference and resource tool for health sciences and human services libraries. The AJMR is targeted for researchers, clinicians, practitioners, students, and other professionals in mental retardation and related disabilities.

Current impact factor: 2.51

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2016
2009 Impact Factor 2.507

Additional details

5-year impact 2.91
Cited half-life >10.0
Immediacy index 0.00
Eigenfactor 0.00
Article influence 0.67
Website American Journal on Mental Retardation website
Other titles American journal of mental retardation, AJMR, American journal on mental retardation
ISSN 0895-8017
OCLC 16799715
Material type Periodical, Internet resource
Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

  • Pre-print
    • Archiving status unclear
  • Post-print
    • Archiving status unclear
  • Conditions
    • NIH and Wellcome Trust Authors may comply with funders mandates
    • We have contacted this publisher on multiple occasions, and have not been able to obtain a response to our enquiries. If you have any information on this publisher's policy, please submit an update using the form below.
  • Classification

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple aspects of memory were examined in 42 boys with fragile X syndrome and a comparison group of 42 typically developing boys matched on MA. Working memory, incidental memory, and deliberate memory were assessed with a battery that included both free-recall and recognition tasks. Findings indicated that boys with fragile X syndrome performed more poorly than their matches on most measures. The exception was free recall, in which their accuracy was equal to that of the control participants. Results from analyses of a subset of boys with fragile X syndrome who exhibit characteristics of autism and their MA matches, though preliminary, support the conclusion that memory deficits are especially marked in boys who have fragile X syndrome and evidence autistic behaviors.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 12/2008; 113(6):453-65. DOI:10.1352/2008.113:453-465

  • American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 11/2008; 113(6):423-426. DOI:10.1352/2008.113:423-426
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adults with Down syndrome and early stage Alzheimer's disease showed decline in their ability to selectively attend to stimuli in a multitrial cancellation task. They also showed variability in their performance over the test trials, whereas healthy participants showed stability. These changes in performance were observed approximately 2 years prior to a physician's diagnosis of possible Alzheimer's disease, which was made when they were exhibiting declines in episodic memory suggestive of mild cognitive impairment. Performance on this task varied with the evolution of dementia, showed modestly good sensitivity and specificity, and was relatively easy to administer. Given these qualities this task could be a valuable addition to a neuropsychological battery intended for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 10/2008; 113(5):369-86. DOI:10.1352/2008.113:369-386
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using a cross-lagged panel design, we investigated the impact of positive family processes on change in autism symptoms and behaviors. A sample of 149 co-residing mothers and their adolescent or adult child with autism was drawn from a large, longitudinal study. Maternal warmth and praise were measured using coded speech samples in which mothers talked about their son or daughter. A high level of relationship quality was associated with subsequent reductions in internalizing and externalizing problems as well as reductions in impairments in social reciprocity and repetitive behaviors. Maternal warmth and praise were also related to symptom abatement in the repetitive behaviors domain.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 10/2008; 113(5):387-402. DOI:10.1352/2008.113:387-402
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The analysis of the early development of self-injurious behavior (SIB) has, to date, reflected the wider distinction between nature and nurture. Despite the status of genetic factors as risk markers for the later development of SIB, a model that accounts for their influence on early behavior-environment relations is lacking. In the current paper we argue that the investigation of gene-environment interactions (GxE) and other forms of gene-environment interplay could potentially enhance current approaches to the study of self-injury. A conceptual model of the early development of SIB based explicitly on such relations is presented. The model is consistent with the basic tenets of functional analysis. Implications for research and the assessment, treatment, and prevention of SIB are discussed.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 10/2008; 113(5):403-17. DOI:10.1352/2008.113:403-417
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been limited research on the role of sociocognitive factors in depression with people who have a mild intellectual disability. However, an association has been found between negative social comparison and depressed mood. We extend previous work by including individuals with clinical depression. A between-groups design of 18 depressed versus 18 nondepressed participants was used. Depression measures were administered, along with measures of self-esteem and social comparison. Participants reported the salience of the social comparisons they made. Depressed participants reported significantly more negative social comparisons; the nondepressed group reported that the positive comparisons they made were more salient. These results have implications for cognitive behavior interventions and the possibility of working with people in the context of their interpersonal beliefs.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 08/2008; 113(4):307-18. DOI:10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[307:SCADPW]2.0.CO;2
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changes in health, functional abilities, and behavior problems among 150 adults with Down syndrome and 240 adults with mental retardation due to other causes were examined with seven assessments over a 9-year period. Adults were primarily younger than 40, the age at which declines begin to be evident in individuals with Down syndrome. Adults with Down syndrome were advantaged in their functional abilities and lack of behavior problems, comparable in health, and exhibited comparable rates of change on these measures as adults with mental retardation due to other causes. Placement out of the parental home and parental death were predictors of change in health, functional abilities, and behavior problems.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 08/2008; 113(4):263-77. DOI:10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[263:SACIHF]2.0.CO;2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our purpose in this cross-sectional study with 1,598 adult clients who had intellectual disabilities was to obtain valid prevalences of sensory impairments and to identify associations. The diagnoses were made through ophthalmologic and audiometric assessments, applying WHO/IASSID definitions. Re-weighted prevalences were 5.0% (95% CI 3.9- 6.2%) for the total adult population; 2.9% (1.9-4.1), less than 50 years; and 11.0% (7.9- 14.7), 50 years and over. Apart from being 50 years of age and over, p = .000, risk factors were more severe intellectual disability, p = .0001, and Down syndrome, p = .001. Results show that the risk of combined sensory impairment in this population is considerably increased compared with the general population. Part of the underlying conditions are treatable or can be rehabilitated. However, the complete diagnosis had been identified in only 12%.
    American journal of mental retardation: AJMR 08/2008; 113(4):254-62. DOI:10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[254:CSIDIF]2.0.CO;2