JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC)

Publisher American Medical Association, American Medical Association

Description

JAMA, which began publication in 1883, is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. Key objective is to promote the science and art of medicine and the betterment of the public health.

  • Impact factor
    30.03
    Show impact factor history 
     
    Impact factor
  • Website
    JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) website
  • Other titles
    JAMA (Chicago, Ill.), Journal of the American Medical Association, Continuing education courses for physicians., Continuing education opportunities for physicians for the period
  • ISSN
    0098-7484
  • OCLC
    1124917
  • Material type
    Periodical, Internet resource
  • Document type
    Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

American Medical Association

  • Pre-print
    • Author cannot archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author cannot archive a post-print version
  • Restrictions
    • If funded by non-profit organisation
    • 12 months embargo
  • Conditions
    • On a non-profit publically accessible repository
    • Must link to publisher version
  • Classification
    ​ white

Publications in this journal

  • Article: Effects of Targeting Higher vs Lower Arterial Oxygen Saturations on Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IMPORTANCE The goal of oxygen therapy is to deliver sufficient oxygen to the tissues while minimizing oxygen toxicity and oxidative stress. It remains uncertain what values of arterial oxygen saturations achieve this balance in preterm infants. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of targeting lower or higher arterial oxygen saturations on the rate of death or disability in extremely preterm infants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind trial in 25 hospitals in Canada, the United States, Argentina, Finland, Germany, and Israel in which 1201 infants with gestational ages of 23 weeks 0 days through 27 weeks 6 days were enrolled within 24 hours after birth between December 2006 and August 2010. Follow-up assessments began in October 2008 and ended in August 2012. INTERVENTIONS Study participants were monitored until postmenstrual ages of 36 to 40 weeks with pulse oximeters that displayed saturations of either 3% above or below the true values. Caregivers adjusted the concentration of oxygen to achieve saturations between 88% and 92%, which produced 2 treatment groups with true target saturations of 85% to 89% (n = 602) or 91% to 95% (n = 599). Alarms were triggered when displayed saturations decreased to 86% or increased to 94%. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was a composite of death, gross motor disability, cognitive or language delay, severe hearing loss, or bilateral blindness at a corrected age of 18 months. Secondary outcomes included retinopathy of prematurity and brain injury. RESULTS Of the 578 infants with adequate data for the primary outcome who were assigned to the lower target range, 298 (51.6%) died or survived with disability compared with 283 of the 569 infants (49.7%) assigned to the higher target range (odds ratio adjusted for center, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P = .52). The rates of death were 16.6% for those in the 85% to 89% group and 15.3% for those in the 91% to 95% group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.54; P = .54). Targeting lower saturations reduced the postmenstrual age at last use of oxygen therapy (adjusted mean difference, -0.8 weeks; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.1; P = .03) but did not alter any other outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE In extremely preterm infants, targeting oxygen saturations of 85% to 89% compared with 91% to 95% had no significant effect on the rate of death or disability at 18 months. These results may help determine the optimal target oxygen saturation. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS ISRCTN Identifier: 62491227; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00637169.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 05/2013;
  • Article: Prevalence of a Healthy Lifestyle Among Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease in High-, Middle- and Low-Income Countries The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 04/2013;
  • Article: Lifestyle
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 04/2013;
  • Article: Sedation interruption for mechanically ventilated patients.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 03/2013; 309(10):982-3.
  • Article: DEFINITION OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME.SILVIO A. NAMENDYS-SILVA, MARISOL HERNANDEZ-GARAY. JAMA. 2012;308(13):1321
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To the Editor: The updated and revised Berlin Definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)1 suggested correction of the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) if the altitude is higher than 1000 m. We agree with this recommendation; however, we believe that it applies only to patients spontaneously breathing room air. People who live at high altitudes have ventilatory acclimatization to low PaO2.2 Pérez-Padilla3 estimated in 2002 that in Mexico, approximately 5% of the population lived at altitudes 2500 m above sea level, and half lived above 1550 m. In normal persons, upon exposure to an altitude such as that of Mexico City (2240 m), an increase in the FIO2 returns the PaO2 to levels achieved at sea level.2
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 10/2012; JAMA(308(13)):1321.
  • Article: Troponin levels and mortality after noncardiac surgery.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 09/2012; 308(12):1204.
  • Article: Supplementary Imaging for Breast CancerScreening in High-Risk Women
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 07/2012; 308(3):236.
  • Article: Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: The value of assessing various emerging lipid-related markers for prediction of first cardiovascular events is debated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding information on apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein(a), or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 to total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual records were available for 165,544 participants without baseline CVD in 37 prospective cohorts (calendar years of recruitment: 1968-2007) with up to 15,126 incident fatal or nonfatal CVD outcomes (10,132 CHD and 4994 stroke outcomes) during a median follow-up of 10.4 years (interquartile range, 7.6-14 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discrimination of CVD outcomes and reclassification of participants across predicted 10-year risk categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10%-<20%), and high (≥20%) risk. RESULTS: The addition of information on various lipid-related markers to total cholesterol, HDL-C, and other conventional risk factors yielded improvement in the model's discrimination: C-index change, 0.0006 (95% CI, 0.0002-0.0009) for the combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I; 0.0016 (95% CI, 0.0009-0.0023) for lipoprotein(a); and 0.0018 (95% CI, 0.0010-0.0026) for lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass. Net reclassification improvements were less than 1% with the addition of each of these markers to risk scores containing conventional risk factors. We estimated that for 100,000 adults aged 40 years or older, 15,436 would be initially classified at intermediate risk using conventional risk factors alone. Additional testing with a combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I would reclassify 1.1%; lipoprotein(a), 4.1%; and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass, 2.7% of people to a 20% or higher predicted CVD risk category and, therefore, in need of statin treatment under Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. CONCLUSION: In a study of individuals without known CVD, the addition of information on the combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I, lipoprotein(a), or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass to risk scores containing total cholesterol and HDL-C led to slight improvement in CVD prediction.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 06/2012; 307(23):2499-506.
  • Article: Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: The value of assessing various emerging lipid-related markers for prediction of first cardiovascular events is debated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding information on apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein(a), or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 to total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual records were available for 165,544 participants without baseline CVD in 37 prospective cohorts (calendar years of recruitment: 1968-2007) with up to 15,126 incident fatal or nonfatal CVD outcomes (10,132 CHD and 4994 stroke outcomes) during a median follow-up of 10.4 years (interquartile range, 7.6-14 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discrimination of CVD outcomes and reclassification of participants across predicted 10-year risk categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10%-<20%), and high (≥20%) risk. RESULTS: The addition of information on various lipid-related markers to total cholesterol, HDL-C, and other conventional risk factors yielded improvement in the model's discrimination: C-index change, 0.0006 (95% CI, 0.0002-0.0009) for the combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I; 0.0016 (95% CI, 0.0009-0.0023) for lipoprotein(a); and 0.0018 (95% CI, 0.0010-0.0026) for lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass. Net reclassification improvements were less than 1% with the addition of each of these markers to risk scores containing conventional risk factors. We estimated that for 100,000 adults aged 40 years or older, 15,436 would be initially classified at intermediate risk using conventional risk factors alone. Additional testing with a combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I would reclassify 1.1%; lipoprotein(a), 4.1%; and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass, 2.7% of people to a 20% or higher predicted CVD risk category and, therefore, in need of statin treatment under Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. CONCLUSION: In a study of individuals without known CVD, the addition of information on the combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I, lipoprotein(a), or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass to risk scores containing total cholesterol and HDL-C led to slight improvement in CVD prediction.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 06/2012; 307(23):2499-506.

Keywords

aged
 
among
 
associated
 
cancer
 
care
 
center
 
ci
 
clinical
 
context
 
control
 
death
 
design
 
diseas
 
from
 
group
 
health
 
hiv
 
hospital
 
main
 
measur
 
medical
 
month
 
mortaliti
 
objectiv
 
outcom
 
p
 
participant
 
patient
 
person
 
physician
 
placebo
 
prevention
 
randomized
 
risk
 
rr
 
setting
 
stroke
 
studi
 
than
 
therapi
 
treatment
 
trial
 
united
 
use
 
vs
 
were
 
who
 
women
 
year
 

Related Journals