Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance Impact Factor & Information

Publisher: American Psychological Association, American Psychological Association

Journal description

The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, and related cognitive processes. All sensory modalities and motor systems are within its purview. The focus of the journal is on empirical studies that increase theoretical understanding of human perception and performance, but machine and animal studies that reflect on human capabilities may also be published. Occasional nonempirical reports, called Observations, may also be included. These are theoretical notes, commentary, or criticism on topics pertinent to the Journal's concerns.

Current impact factor: 3.11

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2015
2013 / 2014 Impact Factor 3.105
2012 Impact Factor 2.404
2011 Impact Factor 3.061
2010 Impact Factor 2.785
2009 Impact Factor 3.065
2008 Impact Factor 2.947
2007 Impact Factor 2.58
2006 Impact Factor 2.261
2005 Impact Factor 2.883
2004 Impact Factor 2.529
2003 Impact Factor 2.906
2002 Impact Factor 2.335
2001 Impact Factor 2.498
2000 Impact Factor 2.247
1999 Impact Factor 2.332
1998 Impact Factor 2.406

Impact factor over time

Impact factor
Year

Additional details

5-year impact 3.26
Cited half-life 0.00
Immediacy index 0.52
Eigenfactor 0.02
Article influence 1.40
Website Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance website
Other titles Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, Human perception and performance
ISSN 0096-1523
OCLC 2441505
Material type Periodical, Internet resource
Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

American Psychological Association

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • Authors' pre-print on a web-site
    • Authors' pre-print must be labeled with date and accompanied with statement that paper has not (yet) been published
    • Copy of authors final peer-reviewed manuscript as accepted for publication
    • Authors' post-print on author's web-site, employers server or institutional repository, after acceptance
    • Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged
    • Must link to APA journal home page or article DOI
    • Article must include the following statement: 'This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.'
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • APA will submit NIH author articles to PubMed Central, after author completion of form
  • Classification
    ‚Äč green

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A recently reported phenomenon, termed attribute amnesia, challenged the commonly held belief that attention plays the determining role in controlling how information is remembered, by showing that participants fail to remember a specific attended attribute (e.g., the target-defining color), even when they had just used that attribute to perform a task (Chen & Wyble, 2015a). The main purpose of the present study sought to better understand the mechanism underlying this phenomenon. The results revealed that attribute amnesia was nearly eliminated once participants were forced to store and hold attended information for a brief time, suggesting that this amnesia effect most likely reflects a lack of memory consolidation for an attended attribute that had been processed to some certain level. In addition, we demonstrate that the effect is not particular to the use of location report, or the repetition of targets. One further finding is that amnesia was markedly absent for location memory, indicating an important difference between memories for locations and attributes such as color or identity.
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 07/2015;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Norris and colleagues (Kinoshita & Norris, 2009; Norris & Kinoshita, 2008; Norris, Kinoshita, & van Casteren, 2010) have suggested that priming effects in the masked prime same-different task are based solely on prelexical orthographic codes. This suggestion was evaluated by examining phonological priming in that task using Japanese-English bilinguals. Targets and reference words were English words with the primes written in Katakana script, a syllabic script that is orthographically quite different from the Roman letter script used in writing English. Phonological priming was observed both when the primes were Japanese cognate translation equivalents of the English target/reference words (Experiment 1) and when the primes were phonologically similar Katakana nonwords (Experiment 2), with the former effects being substantially larger than the noncognate translation priming effects reported by Lupker, Perea, and Nakayama (2015). These results indicate that the same-different task is influenced by phonological information. One implication is that, due to the fact that phonology and orthography are inevitably confounded in Roman letter languages, previously reported priming effects in those languages may have been at least partly due to phonological, rather than orthographic, similarity. The potential extent of this problem, the nature of the matching process in the same-different task, and the implications for using this task as a means of investigating the orthographic code in reading are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 06/2015; in press. DOI:10.1037/xhp0000087