Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance Impact Factor & Information

Publisher: American Psychological Association, American Psychological Association

Journal description

The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, and related cognitive processes. All sensory modalities and motor systems are within its purview. The focus of the journal is on empirical studies that increase theoretical understanding of human perception and performance, but machine and animal studies that reflect on human capabilities may also be published. Occasional nonempirical reports, called Observations, may also be included. These are theoretical notes, commentary, or criticism on topics pertinent to the Journal's concerns.

Current impact factor: 3.11

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2015
2013 / 2014 Impact Factor 3.105
2012 Impact Factor 2.404
2011 Impact Factor 3.061
2010 Impact Factor 2.785
2009 Impact Factor 3.065
2008 Impact Factor 2.947
2007 Impact Factor 2.58
2006 Impact Factor 2.261
2005 Impact Factor 2.883
2004 Impact Factor 2.529
2003 Impact Factor 2.906
2002 Impact Factor 2.335
2001 Impact Factor 2.498
2000 Impact Factor 2.247
1999 Impact Factor 2.332
1998 Impact Factor 2.406

Impact factor over time

Impact factor
Year

Additional details

5-year impact 3.26
Cited half-life 0.00
Immediacy index 0.52
Eigenfactor 0.02
Article influence 1.40
Website Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance website
Other titles Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, Human perception and performance
ISSN 0096-1523
OCLC 2441505
Material type Periodical, Internet resource
Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

American Psychological Association

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • Pre-print on a web-site
    • Pre-print must be labeled with date and accompanied with statement that paper has not (yet) been published
    • Copy of authors final peer-reviewed manuscript as accepted for publication
    • Post-print on author's web-site or employers server only, after acceptance
    • Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged
    • Must link to APA journal home page or article DOI
    • Article must include the following statement: 'This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.'
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • APA will submit NIH author articles to PubMed Central, after author completion of form
  • Classification
    ‚Äč green

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Norris and colleagues (Kinoshita & Norris, 2009; Norris & Kinoshita, 2008; Norris, Kinoshita, & van Casteren, 2010) have suggested that priming effects in the masked prime same-different task are based solely on prelexical orthographic codes. This suggestion was evaluated by examining phonological priming in that task using Japanese-English bilinguals. Targets and reference words were English words with the primes written in Katakana script, a syllabic script that is orthographically quite different from the Roman letter script used in writing English. Phonological priming was observed both when the primes were Japanese cognate translation equivalents of the English target/reference words (Experiment 1) and when the primes were phonologically similar Katakana nonwords (Experiment 2), with the former effects being substantially larger than the noncognate translation priming effects reported by Lupker, Perea, and Nakayama (2015). These results indicate that the same-different task is influenced by phonological information. One implication is that, due to the fact that phonology and orthography are inevitably confounded in Roman letter languages, previously reported priming effects in those languages may have been at least partly due to phonological, rather than orthographic, similarity. The potential extent of this problem, the nature of the matching process in the same-different task, and the implications for using this task as a means of investigating the orthographic code in reading are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 06/2015; in press. DOI:10.1037/xhp0000087
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Representing the locations of tactile stimulation can involve somatotopic reference frames in which locations are defined relative to a position on the skin surface, and also external reference frames that take into account stimulus position in external space. Locations in somatotopic and external reference frames can conflict in terms of left/right assignment when the hands are crossed or positioned outside of their typical hemispace. To investigate the spatial codes of the representation of both tactile stimuli and responses to touch, a Simon effect task, often used in the visual modality to examine issues of spatial reference frames, was deployed in the tactile modality. Participants performed the task with stimuli delivered to the hands with arms in crossed or uncrossed postures and responses were produced with foot pedals. Across all 4 experiments, participants were faster on somatotopically congruent trials (e.g., left hand stimulus, left foot response) than on somatotopically incongruent trials (left hand stimulus, right foot response), regardless of arm or leg position. However, some evidence of an externally based Simon effect also appeared in 1 experiment in which arm (stimulus) and leg (response) position were both manipulated. Overall, the results demonstrate that tactile stimulus and response codes are primarily generated based on their somatotopic identity. However, stimulus and response coding based on an external reference frame can become more salient when both hands and feet can be crossed, creating a situation in which somatotopic and external representations can differ for both stimulus and response codes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 01/2015; DOI:10.1037/a0037975
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Behavior is typically organized with respect to a goal to be achieved rather than the anatomical components used in doing so. Similarly, perception is typically organized with respect to a property to be perceived rather than the anatomical components used in doing so. Such task specificity and anatomical independence is manifest in perception of properties of a wielded object. In 6 experiments, we investigated whether these properties might also be manifest in perception of properties by means of a wielded object. In particular, we investigated perception of whether a surface could be stood on when the object used to explore that surface is wielded by the preferred and nonpreferred hands (Experiment 1), by 1 or both hands (Experiment 2), by different 2-handed grips (Experiment 3), and by entirely different limbs (i.e., the hand and the foot, Experiments 4-6). In general, the results show that perception reflected the action capabilities of the perceiver but was largely unaffected by the (configurations of) anatomical components used to wield the object. The results highlight the haptic system as a smart perceptual device and as a multifractal biotensegrity structure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 11/2014; DOI:10.1037/xhp0000014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Continuous tasks such as baggage screening often involve selective gating of sensory information when "targets" are detected. Previous research has shown that temporal selection of behaviorally relevant information triggers changes in perception, learning, and memory. However, it is unclear whether temporal selection has broad effects on concurrent tasks. To address this question, we asked participants to view a stream of faces and encoded faces of a particular gender for a later memory test. At the same time, they listened to a sequence of tones, pressing a button for specific pitched tones. We manipulated the timing of temporal selection such that target faces and target tones could be unrelated, perfectly correlated, or anticorrelated. Temporal selection was successful when the temporally coinciding stimuli were congruent (e.g., both were targets), but not when they were incongruent (i.e., only 1 was a target). This pattern suggests that attentional selection for separate tasks is yoked in time-when the attentional gate opens for 1 task it also opens for the other. Temporal yoking is a unique form of dual-task interaction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 11/2014; DOI:10.1037/a0038286
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The question of what makes a good melody has interested composers, music theorists, and psychologists alike. Many of the observed principles of good "melodic continuation" involve melodic contour-the pattern of rising and falling pitch within a sequence. Previous work has shown that contour perception can extend beyond pitch to other auditory dimensions, such as brightness and loudness. Here, we show that the generalization of contour perception to nontraditional dimensions also extends to melodic expectations. In the first experiment, subjective ratings for 3-tone sequences that vary in brightness or loudness conformed to the same general contour-based expectations as pitch sequences. In the second experiment, we modified the sequence of melody presentation such that melodies with the same beginning were blocked together. This change produced substantively different results, but the patterns of ratings remained similar across the 3 auditory dimensions. Taken together, these results suggest that (a) certain well-known principles of melodic expectation (such as the expectation for a reversal following a skip) are dependent on long-term context, and (b) these expectations are not unique to the dimension of pitch and may instead reflect more general principles of perceptual organization. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 11/2014; DOI:10.1037/a0038291