Radiologic technology Journal Impact Factor & Information
Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the ASRT. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 100,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radiologic Technology features continuing education article and a variety of columns and departments of interest to members of the profession.
Current impact factor: 0.00
Impact Factor Rankings
|Website||Radiologic Technology website|
|Other titles||Radiologic technology|
|Material type||Periodical, Internet resource|
|Document type||Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource|
Publications in this journal
Article: Renal disorders.[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The renal system and its many functions are vital to an individual's overall health. This article discusses the important functions the kidneys carry out day to day, as well as the many different types of diseases and anomalies that affect the renal system. Some of the risk factors that cause renal disease can be minimized with physician monitoring; however, when disease is present the radiologic technologist plays a vital role in diagnosis and, ultimately, the patient's recovery.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(5):433-46; quiz 447-9.
Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(4):355-6.
Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(3):270-2.
Article: How to review literature.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(4):306-8.
Article: Streaking in a darkroom.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(6):572.
Article: RAs increase productivity.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(4):365-70.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Currently used positioning landmarks for the lateral scapula and Y projections often yield inconsistent results and lead to repeats. To determine whether new positioning landmarks can help radiographers position the lateral scapula and Y projections more accurately. Following laboratory experimentation on dry bone specimens, a small pilot study was conducted in the clinical setting to test the new landmarks. Laboratory and clinical testing of the use of the acromial tip and superior angle of the scapula suggest that these landmarks are easier to use and improve accuracy of positioning.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(5):397-404.
Article: A thing in a thong.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(3):260.
Article: Improving hospital-based programs.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(3):263-9.
Article: Perils of drug mules.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(5):472.
Article: Take it all off.Radiologic technology 01/2008; 79(4):353-4.
Article: Separation anxietyRadiologic technology 12/2007; 196(2633):24. DOI:10.1016/S0262-4079(07)63079-6
Article: An aid for pediatric chest exams.Radiologic technology 01/2007; 79(2):193-4.
Radiologic technology 01/2007; 78(6):534-6.
Article: When to assess competency.Radiologic technology 01/2007; 78(6):527.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: (18)FDG is used widely to enhance PET and PET-CT images. However, this radiotracer tends to be taken up by brown fat, which can lead to false-positive diagnoses. Purpose To determine which patients, areas of the body and circumstances are more likely to be associated with false-positive diagnoses due to (18)FDG uptake in brown fat. A review of the literature was conducted on factors that contribute to false-positive diagnoses caused by (18)FDG uptake in brown fat. Brown fat commonly is found in women and children and can be located in the supraclavicular, mediastinal, paravertebral and perirenal areas of the body. Research has shown that these areas can be sources of a false-positive diagnosis because of (18)FDG uptake. Studies also have indicated that cold climate affects the uptake of (18)FDG, contributing to false-positive results on PET-CT examinations. This literature review should stimulate continued research into and awareness of the potential for false-positive PET findings in women and children during the winter months and in cold climates. This information is especially applicable to young female patients undergoing PET or PET-CT.Radiologic technology 01/2007; 78(5):361-6.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.