The Science of Nature Journal Impact Factor & Information

Publisher: Kaiser Wilhelm-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften; Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, Springer Verlag

Journal description

In 1913 Arnold Berliner the founder of Naturwissenschaften formulated the following goal for the journal: " it should inform all those working in scientific fields (either as researchers or teachers) about what interests them outside their own fields." Authors such as Albert Einstein Werner Heisenberg Max von der Laue Karl von Frisch Konrad Lorenz Manfred Eigen etc. have in the past worked to bring this about. In the future too top researchers worldwide will continue to report on the status of their subject areas in 'Review articles' in 'Short original articles' they will introduce new results and in 'Book reviews' they will give critical evaluations of important new literature.

Current impact factor: 2.10

Impact Factor Rankings

2015 Impact Factor Available summer 2016
2014 Impact Factor 2.098
2013 Impact Factor 1.971
2012 Impact Factor 2.144
2011 Impact Factor 2.278
2010 Impact Factor 2.25
2009 Impact Factor 2.316
2008 Impact Factor 2.126
2007 Impact Factor 1.955
2006 Impact Factor 2.021
2005 Impact Factor 1.953
2004 Impact Factor 2.05
2003 Impact Factor 1.883
2002 Impact Factor 1.693
2001 Impact Factor 1.624
2000 Impact Factor 1.261
1999 Impact Factor 1.279
1998 Impact Factor 0.956
1997 Impact Factor 1.171
1996 Impact Factor 1.076
1995 Impact Factor 0.984
1994 Impact Factor 1.163
1993 Impact Factor 1.047
1992 Impact Factor 0.834

Impact factor over time

Impact factor

Additional details

5-year impact 2.08
Cited half-life >10.0
Immediacy index 0.36
Eigenfactor 0.01
Article influence 0.73
Website Naturwissenschaften website
Other titles Die Naturwissenschaften
ISSN 0028-1042
OCLC 1759509
Material type Periodical, Internet resource
Document type Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

Springer Verlag

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • Author's pre-print on pre-print servers such as
    • Author's post-print on author's personal website immediately
    • Author's post-print on any open access repository after 12 months after publication
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • Published source must be acknowledged
    • Must link to publisher version
    • Set phrase to accompany link to published version (see policy)
    • Articles in some journals can be made Open Access on payment of additional charge
  • Classification
    ​ green

Publications in this journal

  • Lina Bai · Ting Xie · Qingqing Hu · Changyan Deng · Rong Zheng · Wanping Chen
    The Science of Nature 10/2015; 102(9-10). DOI:10.1007/s00114-015-1314-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fishes have evolved to exploit multiple ecological niches. Extant fishes in both marine (e.g., rabbitfishes, surgeonfishes) and freshwater systems (e.g., haplochromine cichlids, characiforms) have evolved specialized, scoop-like, multidenticulate teeth for benthic scraping, feeding primarily on algae. Here, I report evidence of the oldest example of specialized multidenticulate dentition in a ray-finned fish, †Hemicalypterus weiri, from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of southeastern Utah (∼210-205 Ma), USA. †H. weiri is a lower actinopterygian species that is phylogenetically remote from modern fishes, and has evolved specialized teeth that converge with those of several living teleost fishes (e.g., characiforms, cichlids, acanthurids, siganids), with a likely function of these teeth being to scrape algae off a rock substrate. This finding contradicts previously held notions that fishes with multicuspid, scoop-like dentition were restricted to teleosts, and indicates that ray-finned fishes were diversifying into different trophic niches and exploring different modes of feeding earlier in their history than previously thought, fundamentally altering our perceptions of the ecological roles of fishes during the Mesozoic.
    The Science of Nature 04/2015; 102(3-4):1262. DOI:10.1007/s00114-015-1262-y
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although polygamy is common in insects, its extent varies enormously among natural populations. Mating systems influence the evolution of reproductive traits and the difference in extent of polygamy between males and females may be a key factor in determining traits which come under the influence of sexual selection. Fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster are promiscuous as both males and females mate with multiple partners. Mating has severe consequences on the physiology and behaviour of flies, and it affects their activity/rest rhythm in a sex-specific manner. In this study, we attempted to discern the effects of mating with multiple partners as opposed to a single partner, or of remaining unmated, on the activity/rest rhythm of flies under cyclic semi-natural (SN) and constant dark (DD) conditions. The results revealed that while evening activity of mated flies was significantly reduced compared to virgins, polygamous males showed a more severe reduction compared to monogamous males. In contrast, though mated females showed reduction in evening activity compared to virgins, activity levels were not different between polygamous and monogamous females. Although there was no detectable effect of mating on clock period, power of the activity/rest rhythm was significantly reduced in mated females with no difference seen between polygamous and monogamous individuals. These results suggest that courtship motivation, represented by evening activity, is successively reduced in males due to mating with one or more partners, while in females, it does not depend on the number of mating partners. Based on these results we conclude that polygamy affects the activity/rest rhythm of fruit flies D. melanogaster in a sex-dependent manner.
    The Science of Nature 02/2015; 102(1-2):1252. DOI:10.1007/s00114-014-1252-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In spite that carotenoid-based sexual ornaments are one of the most popular research topics in sexual selection of animals, the antioxidant and immunostimulatory role of carotenoids, presumably signaled by these colorful ornaments, is still controversial. It has been suggested that the function of carotenoids might not be as an antioxidant per se, but that colorful carotenoids may indirectly reflect the levels of nonpigmentary antioxidants, such as melatonin or vitamin E. We experimentally fed male Iberian green lizards (Lacerta schreiberi) additional carotenoids or vitamin E alone, or a combination of carotenoids and vitamin E dissolved in soybean oil, whereas a control group only received soybean oil. We examined the effects of the dietary supplementations on phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-induced skin-swelling immune response and body condition. Lizards that were supplemented with vitamin E alone or a combination of vitamin E and carotenoids had greater immune responses than control lizards, but animals supplemented with carotenoids alone had lower immune responses than lizards supplemented with vitamin E and did not differ from control lizards. These results support the hypothesis that carotenoids in green lizards are not effective as immunostimulants, but that they may be visually signaling the immunostimulatory effects of non-pigmentary vitamin E. In contrast, lizards supplemented with carotenoids alone have higher body condition gains than lizards in the other experimental groups, suggesting that carotenoids may be still important to improve condition.
    The Science of Nature 10/2014; 101(12). DOI:10.1007/s00114-014-1250-7