Environment and Behavior (ENVIRON BEHAV )

Publisher: SAGE Publications


Environment and Behavior reports rigorous experimental and theoretical work on the study, design and control of the physical environment and its interaction with human behavioural systems.

Impact factor 1.27

  • 5-year impact
  • Cited half-life
  • Immediacy index
  • Eigenfactor
  • Article influence
  • Website
    Environment and Behavior website
  • Other titles
    Environment and behavior, EB. Environment and behavior, Environment & behavior
  • ISSN
  • OCLC
  • Material type
    Periodical, Internet resource
  • Document type
    Journal / Magazine / Newspaper, Internet Resource

Publisher details

SAGE Publications

  • Pre-print
    • Author can archive a pre-print version
  • Post-print
    • Author can archive a post-print version
  • Conditions
    • Authors retain copyright
    • Pre-print on any website
    • Author's post-print on author's personal website, departmental website, institutional website or institutional repository
    • On other repositories including PubMed Central after 12 months embargo
    • Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged
    • Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used
    • Post-print version with changes from referees comments can be used
    • "as published" final version with layout and copy-editing changes cannot be archived but can be used on secure institutional intranet
  • Classification
    ​ green

Publications in this journal

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sedentary lifestyle is blamed as a leading cause for the continuous rise in death rates due to non-communicable diseases (WHO, 2010) such as obesity, type II diabetes, hypertension and heart disease. The promotion of a more active lifestyle has recently tended to focus on small measures taken in daily life, such as walking, bicycling and climbing stairs. Urban environments are increasingly in multiple levels, potentially offering more opportunities for stair climbing in particular as part of daily routines. Efforts at promoting stair climbing have focused on motivational campaigns with some success as discussed below. Limited attention has been paid to the location of pedestrian facilities or their design as factors in increased stair climbing. Substantial variability in stair climbing rates across facilities, environments, cities and cultures suggests that the location of stair, escalator and elevator facilities offer a largely untapped opportunity to increase the active transport option.
    Environment and Behavior 12/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: http://eab.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/24/0013916514551048
    Environment and Behavior 09/2014;
  • Environment and Behavior 07/2014; 46: 768.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Strategies to promote environmentally friendly behavior among consumers require an understanding of how such behaviors are interrelated. We examined 29 different environmentally significant behaviors, using data from surveys in Germany (n = 967) and in Norway (n = 880). A priori models derived from previous research assuming either environmental behavior as a single factor or as organized by behavioral sectors, degrees of constraint, or frequencies of occurrence did not fit the data. In contrast, a model developed via a bottom-up approach with the German data was supported by the independent, Norwegian sample. This model can integrate several theoretical perspectives and suggests three distinct behavioral fields, with little or no correlation: home-based actions, car use, and air travel for vacation. The factor home-based actions encompasses several behaviors and correlates with the New Ecological Paradigm scale but also with a measure of impression management. Implications for understanding and influencing environmentally significant behaviors are discussed. Published online prior to print http://eab.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/02/26/0013916514525038.abstract
    Environment and Behavior 02/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Place and community attachment, community satisfaction, and environmental attitudes have all been independently linked to environmental behaviors. However, few efforts have attempted to determine the relationship between these factors, and together, how they relate to pro-environmental behaviors. Moreover, few studies have analyzed these concepts and relationships in the context of rural and low amenity settings. This study integrates these factors in a conceptual framework and examines them in the context of rural, low amenity communities. Based on the analysis of data from a survey of residents in six small, rural communities in Kansas and Iowa (N = 1,088), we find that environmental attitudes and place attachment are the strongest predictors of self-reported pro-environmental behaviors, while community satisfaction—including satisfaction with services and satisfaction with community leadership—is not a significant predictor. Recommendations for future research following the theoretical approach used in the study are presented.
    Environment and Behavior 02/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research has not addressed the possibility that people may face conflicting norms of pro-environmental behavior from their multiple in-groups. Across two studies, the authors test competing hypotheses: People may be demotivated by norm conflict, or conversely, norm conflict may motivate people to action. The results of both studies suggest a clearly motivating effect of conflict. Norm conflict was associated with decreased water usage (i.e., increased water conservation) in Study 1, and increased pro-environmental behavior intentions in Study 2. The effects of conflict were partially mediated by perceived effectiveness in Study 2. Although these initial findings indicate that conflict motivates rather than hinders behavioral engagement, future research should investigate whether the nature of the influence of norm conflict depends on factors such as issue importance.
    Environment and Behavior 02/2014; 46(2):139-162.